Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rotating Valve Engine.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rotating Valve Engine.

    I saw this in class and thought it was cool enough to share on here. Im sure some of you have seen this before, but i bet a few haven't so enjoy..



    The Coates Spherical Rotary Valve Engine is the most advanced in the world, with the most positive valving system ever built. The breathing capabilities of the system are almost double that of a poppet valve. For instance: a static test of a five-litre poppet valve engine on an airflow machine produced a reading of 133 cubic feet per minute (CFM) with valve fully opened. The five-litre Coates Spherical Rotary Valve Engine on the same machine, however, produced a reading of 319 CFMs fully opened; a colossal advantage in airflow comparison. A five-litre poppet vavle engine tested on a dynomometer under the same loads and conditions at 5500 produced 480 BHP and 454 foot pounds of torque. The maximum RPMs on the poppet valve engine were 5700 RPMs; the Spherical Rotary Valve Engine in comparison reached 14,850 RPM's, The Coates Spherical Rotary Valve comprises two spherical rotary valves assembled on two separate shafts - one for inlet and one for exhaust. They rotate on ceramic carbon bearing with no oil lubrication, the spheres do not make contact with any part of the housing. The seals are a floating type and are also made of a ceramic material. They have two piston rings and are floating in a small cylinder-type chamber, they are activated by the compression and the combustion strokes of the engine which allows 100 percent sealing effectiveness, when compressed.

    Because the valves rotate away from the combustion chamber and are vented and charged on the opposite side of each sphere, this creates a lower combustion chamber temperature, allowing for higher compression ratios to be used thus creating an extremely efficient engine. Some of the Coates Spherical Rotary Combustion Engines are at 12 to 1, 13 to 1, 14 to 1 and 15 to 1 compression ratios depending on the application.













    Here is another design i thought was interesting.




    320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

    DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

  • #2
    heres a link to a giant picture that i dont have time to re-size.


    320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

    DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

    Comment


    • #3
      I had a thread about the Coates stuff back on the other board about 8 years ago (holy shit... 8 years.)




      Same pics. Looks like their progress is slow... if there's any at all.



      05-10-2003, 01:57 AM
      In testing, they took a STOCK 5.0 L engine from a Lincoln. The stock head flowed 180 cfm on the intake port at static. The rotary valve for the engine in comparison flowed 319-cfm at the same test pressure.
      Equipped with the conventional head, the engine dynoed at 260 hp and 249 ft/lbs. When equipped with the CSRV head at the same 5,500 rpm test protocol, it made 475 hp and 454 ft/lbs, with no changes to the block or rotating assembly:

      With a conventional poppet valve, it can take 34 degrees of crankshaft rotation or more to reach a fully open position, wasting energy and limiting volumetric efficiency. With the CSRV, a comparable port area is exposed in only 2 degrees of crank rotation. The CSRV allows for superior surface flow coefficients from its spherical shape. With the standard 4inch Ford bore, the factory poppet valve covers only 15.8 percent of the total bore area, while the rotary valve is measured at 20.5 percent.
      The spherical rotary valve system is made up of spheres rotating on a shaft sandwiched between a split head. These spheres are either chain or belt driven via the crankshaft, much like an overhead camshaft. Each sphere rotates against a matching seal between it and the piston, one for intake and one for exhaust. The spheres have cavities and ports machined into them for the induction of fuel and air on the intake stroke, and the evacuation of fired gases on the exhaust stroke. This design performs exactly the same function as poppet valves, but the design eliminates the poppet valves, valve springs, guides, camshaft, pushrods, rocker arms and other smaller parts. The Coates engine operates with over 100 fewer parts than convention engines
      The Coates Spherical Rotary Valve comprises two spherical rotary valves assembled on two separate shafts - one for inlet and one for exhaust. They rotate on ceramic carbon bearing with no oil lubrication, the spheres do not make contact with any part of the housing. The seals are a floating type and are also made of a ceramic material. They have two piston rings and are floating in a small cylinder-type chamber, they are activated by the compression and the combustion strokes of the engine which allows 100 percent sealing effectiveness, when compressed.
      Here's the kicker though. Kits start at $15,000 for most engines. Coates also said that so far, Detroit has shown the least interest, so if we ever see this technology in a production car, it will more than likely be a foreign manufacturer.

      Comment


      • #4
        Yeah, this is pretty old news but still cool. The RPM levels are insane.
        "Any dog under 50lbs is a cat and cats are pointless." - Ron Swanson

        Comment


        • #5
          Information has changed a little bit, but it's the same.

          I wonder why, something they say is so great has failed to be mass produced or even made an option.

          I know its costly and isn't something id think were cheap at all.

          Getting away from poppet valves and going this route seems to be the better choice of the two.

          What are the draw backs besides cost?

          320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

          DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

          Comment


          • #6
            Not sure about what you all would do, but if I had more money then brains I would buy this. Just because no one else would have it, I can't imagine what this would do with forced Induction or some nitrous. Talk about serious horsepower.

            320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

            DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

            Comment


            • #7
              Go read through some of their press releases over the past year. It seems they're very much alive and well, just not in the passenger car market.



              2/9/11


              COATES INTERNATIONAL, LTD. RECIEVES A POSITIVE RESPONE FROM DUBAI, UNITED ARAB EMERITES

              Wednesday, February 9, 2011 – For Immediate Release

              WALL TOWNSHIP, N.J. – (PR NEWSWIRE) – Coates International, Ltd. (OTCBB: COTE) (the “Company”) is pleased to announce that on February 8th the company received a response from a world business group in Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE), which was a positive response, to use the Coates CSRV industrial electric power engine generators in the oil producing countries to create electric power from the utilization of flare off gas that would otherwise be wasted. The Chairman of this group visited the company on January 14, 2011.
              Project Plans are being delivered, and on March 8th a team of Coates executives expect to travel to Dubai, UAE to work out the details and inspect the site where the power plant will be set up.

              Comment


              • #8
                It looks like their natural gas engine is Cummins G-855 based.








                These def. look like 855 blocks.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Looks like they gave up on small engines and went straight to generator powerplants.

                  I wonder what held the automotive industry from using this technology?

                  320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

                  DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Strychnine View Post
                    It looks like their natural gas engine is Cummins G-855 based.

                    Speaking of natural gas... isn't there some natural gas powered car coming to the US next year? I thought that would be pretty cool cause the US has boatloads of natural gas. Could end up being something that could reduce our dependency on foreign oil.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by StanleyTweedle View Post
                      Speaking of natural gas... isn't there some natural gas powered car coming to the US next year? I thought that would be pretty cool cause the US has boatloads of natural gas. Could end up being something that could reduce our dependency on foreign oil.
                      Honda. Civic GX


                      Previously targeted primarily to government and fleet customers, individual retail consumers in California, New York, Utah and Oklahoma can now purchase the 2011 Civic GX through Honda dealers certified to sell and service the Civic GX

                      Mercedes is doing a CNG version of the E class, but it's a Deutschland only thing right now.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Damn, that is some intense shit! I thought it sounded vaguely familiar!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
                          Looks like they gave up on small engines and went straight to generator powerplants.

                          I wonder what held the automotive industry from using this technology?
                          I'd bet the cost of liscensing, and emissions certification for OTR applications, but Strychnine is your authority there.
                          ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            so let me get this straight, they turned a stock 5 litre engine 5700, changed heads and turned it 14,850........

                            um, piston speed would be 123 ft/sec with a 3" stroke, get the fuck out of here with the bullshit LOLOLOL
                            pinto gt with wood trim

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Grape View Post
                              so let me get this straight, they turned a stock 5 litre engine 5700, changed heads and turned it 14,850........

                              um, piston speed would be 123 ft/sec with a 3" stroke, get the fuck out of here with the bullshit LOLOLOL
                              They didn't say it lasted forever.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X