Might also represent the 2nd amendment, just doing its thing. One of them there guns might just end the guy trying to do the regulating. Best just not to touch the subject.
Actually buying a gun requires an FBI background check and paperwork filled out, and people get denied because things like being a felon. Anyone can fly, there is no background check to get on an airline and very little paperwork to fill out. You simply pay money, wait in line, go through what is actually very minimal security (minimal because the tsa fails often and people get shit through), and get on your plane. You can be a felon, career criminal, rapist, child molester, insane, or a terrorist and still buy a ticket. You cannot pass a firearms background check with that on your record. 9/11 compared to any mass shooting will show you that the death toll is much larger when terrorists are successful flying vs mass shootings. So the activity that poses the greatest risk actually has less security. I will point out that both firearms ownership and interstate travel (article IV) are protected by the constitution, both have been used to kill large numbers, but the left, in it's hypocrisy, isn't trying to ban travel between the states. They are trying to ban only guns, which are actually more specifically protected than travel, which is actually more inferred and upheld by courts.
I don't like Republicans, but I really FUCKING hate Democrats.
Sex with an Asian woman is great, but 30 minutes later you're horny again.
Getting fucking sick of this constant trolling rodney.
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin "A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser Tytler
it's the ones who feel the need to reply that make it tiresome.
ugh!
Sounds like an obummer supporter...all dissenters should shut up right?
You're not man enough to carry a gun. So you don't want anybody else to do so. Got it.
In the meantime, I'm gonna carry my gun. just in case some idiot friggin libtard like yourself who doesn't know any better might need a law abiding citizen to protect him in the event of a mass shooting.
1990 Mustang GT - 8.17 @ 176
1994 Supra TT - 6 speed
2013 Viper Coupe - Just a Dodge
2009 Rubicon - Lifted, geared, bumpered
1991 Syclone - 25K miles
1970 Roadrunner - Thanks Gary
2013 GT500, 2016 Hellcat, 1972 C10
1999 Baja - Water Toy
Actually buying a gun requires an FBI background check and paperwork filled out, and people get denied because things like being a felon. Anyone can fly, there is no background check to get on an airline and very little paperwork to fill out. You simply pay money, wait in line, go through what is actually very minimal security (minimal because the tsa fails often and people get shit through), and get on your plane. You can be a felon, career criminal, rapist, child molester, insane, or a terrorist and still buy a ticket. You cannot pass a firearms background check with that on your record. 9/11 compared to any mass shooting will show you that the death toll is much larger when terrorists are successful flying vs mass shootings. So the activity that poses the greatest risk actually has less security. I will point out that both firearms ownership and interstate travel (article IV) are protected by the constitution, both have been used to kill large numbers, but the left, in it's hypocrisy, isn't trying to ban travel between the states. They are trying to ban only guns, which are actually more specifically protected than travel, which is actually more inferred and upheld by courts.
You need to stop. That's just logic speaking.
Originally posted by Taya Kyle, American Gun
There comes a time when honest debate, serious diplomatic efforts, and logical arguments have been exhausted and only men and women willing to take up arms against evil will suffice to save the freedom of a nation or continent.
Comment