First GT350 in the 10's

[Torinoman]

What happens to those numbers if you change it to a Dville tune?

[Baron Von Crowder]

What happens to those numbers if you change it to a Dville tune?

[Mysticcobrakilla]

Lmmfao!

[Nash B.]

[Venix]

That car was never meant to do that. I am sure it will have massive issues if they keep spraying a car with that kind of compression. Plenty of similar 500hp car will have better 1/4 times because the gearing, suspension, and engine were simply not designed for it.

Wait until the new big brother comes out with the TT 5.0. Then we will see some 1/4 times to blow people away.

[Snatch Napkin]

The spray is being removed and they're going with a Whipple.

[barronj]

wuz they makin too much powa?

[yellowstang]

LOL! Just underwhelmed with this particular result. If they took a stock car, did the usual tune exhaust tire and lightened it up thing, maybe a little suspension work, and went 10s all motor, then that would be bad ass.

You know, like the coyote did five years ago.





I'm sure when they get a clutch back in it, and a real tire, it will run some stellar times.

You can't compare the 2, that video says Not Applicable at the top right corner!

[Broncojohnny]

well it's not designed to 1/4 mile racing. will your cobra be??

Oh thanks professor, do you think that maybe that could have been my point all along, that the car is not exactly optimized for a quarter mile run?

[sig239]

16 ss + radials/tune/nitrous + 120 odd extra cid = 10.6 @ 129
16 gt350 + radials/tune/intake/exhaust/e85/nitrous = 10.9 @ 125

fixed

[dville_gt]

fixed

granted i don't know a ton about the new gt350, but with that said:

i believe the 350 has a 5.2 (315ci) vs. the 6.2 lt1 (379ci) or 64ci difference in displacement. what i do know is the lt1 is rated 71hp lower than the gt350.

[SS Junk]

well it's not designed to 1/4 mile racing. will your cobra be??

Boy making two thousand dollar bets with a two hundred fifty dollar car.
TUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD

[sig239]

granted i don't know a ton about the new gt350, but with that said:

i believe the 350 has a 5.2 (315ci) vs. the 6.2 lt1 (379ci) or 64ci difference in displacement. what i do know is the lt1 is rated 71hp lower than the gt350.

My bad i was thinking the ss had a 427cid in it for some reason

[aggie97]

LOL! Just underwhelmed with this particular result. If they took a stock car, did the usual tune exhaust tire and lightened it up thing, maybe a little suspension work, and went 10s all motor, then that would be bad ass.

You know, like the coyote did five years ago.





I'm sure when they get a clutch back in it, and a real tire, it will run some stellar times.

Nice. So many of my fellow mustang road racing buddies are so excited about the GT350/S550 and even the coyote powered S197s until I remind them that my 2000 GT weighs 500-700# less, has MORE rwhp with a used take out coyote and a 302 intake and blows the doors off all the new factory pigs. All I hear at that point is crickets.

Wonder what my car would run in the quarter if I could soften it enough to hook up? 3150#, 460rwhp, faceplatted t56 and driver mod all N/A.

[snacksnack]

Want a 350gt and not for drag racing.