Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Acura NSX

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by BlackGT View Post
    Such as?
    The ones with an H and an A.
    sigpic

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by BlackGT View Post
      Such as?
      CRX Si, NSX, Si hatches, Integra GS-R, S2000, Integra Type-R. Honda used to make some cool, fun cars. Not in a long time though.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by BlackGT View Post
        They made enthusiast cars in the past?
        Yeah, if you are enthused about commuting
        2012 GT500

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by BlackGT View Post
          Such as?
          The Del Sol. /thread
          Good judgment comes from bad decisions and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by UserX View Post
            CRX Si, NSX, Si hatches, Integra GS-R, S2000, Integra Type-R. Honda used to make some cool, fun cars. Not in a long time though.
            You forgot the prelude. Got an 01 from auction and it was a fun little bastard. Power was OK, but the handling was awesome.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by ram57ta View Post
              Acura's have been overpriced and underpowered for about as long as they've sold cars. They're not bad cars..hell they are actually very nice.....but they cost more than most cars in their class (Cadillac, Lexus, BMW, Infiniti, etc)...have less power and torque, generally are very dressed up Honda's and are front wheel drive. I'll take a Caddy, Lexus, Infiniti, BMW, Corvette, Viper, Porsche..or just about any other exotic for that kinda money.
              When we were looking for cars for my wife to replace her Mini, she wanted something bigger. She was dead set on an Infiniti G37 or Q50, until she drove an Acura TL. She went with the TL. It was cheaper, more comfortable, and had plenty of power for her. They don't cost more than most cars in their class; they are priced comparably, but they do tend to have less power. People laugh at the VTEC technology because ricers hype it up so much, but it really does pull hard all the way to redline.

              Comment


              • #22
                the old nsx was fun, not fast. one of the better driving cars out there.

                for 150K the new GT over this (simply bc im not a fan of honda) but this car more represents the direction of automotive engineering with multiple electric hybrid systems.

                i haven't seen official specs but i'd imagine this is a smaller combustion engine. ~2.0-2.5 liter v6 with a larger turbos, lag reduced with race bred kinect and thermal energy recover electic motors.
                www.hppmotorsports.com
                ᶘ ᵒᴥᵒᶅ

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by momo View Post
                  the old nsx was fun, not fast. one of the better driving cars out there.

                  for 150K the new GT over this (simply bc im not a fan of honda) but this car more represents the direction of automotive engineering with multiple electric hybrid systems.

                  i haven't seen official specs but i'd imagine this is a smaller combustion engine. ~2.0-2.5 liter v6 with a larger turbos, lag reduced with race bred kinect and thermal energy recover electic motors.
                  I haven't read anything about the displacement, except that it is a longitudinally-mounted, twin-turbo, 75° V6, but I would wager that they use something larger than a 2.5 liter. Probably something closer to the tried-and-true 3.7 that they use in most of their vehicles.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Cobraman View Post
                    Yeah, if you are enthused about commuting
                    this is hilarious!

                    god bless.
                    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men -Frederick Douglass

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I was hoping for a 350hp N/A V6
                      Interested in being a VIP member and donating to the site? Click here http://dfwmustangs.net/forums/payments.php

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Mach1 View Post
                        I was hoping for a 350hp N/A V6
                        When they announced it in 2012, it was supposed to be a 400ish HP NA V6, but they realized they weren't going to be able to compete with today's supercars with that number.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          wrong thread
                          Last edited by chronical; 01-18-2015, 11:28 AM.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X