Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Acura NSX
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by JC316 View PostI like it, but it doesn't look like the performance is going to justify the price. When you think about the other cars out there that can be had for cheaper. Viper, Z06, C6 ZR1, GT500, CTS-V, etc. I would take any one of those over that.
Comment
-
Actually the original Nsx performance was on par with it's benchmarks and priced more affordable as well. Granted there was alot less performance cars back then, the new Nsx still fits 'target' goal of r8 and 458. It may be a dollar too much and a few years too late though.Can't beat them, Join their NEW message board !!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bputacoma View PostActually the original Nsx performance was on par with it's benchmarks and priced more affordable as well. Granted there was alot less performance cars back then, the new Nsx still fits 'target' goal of r8 and 458. It may be a dollar too much and a few years too late though.
Comment
-
Depending on how many of these they produce, I'm thinking you'll be able to pick a new one up for a five figure discount within a few years. Then, it might be interesting. The new Ford GT, the upcoming "Zora", etc. are going to pound this car into the ground, but I'm sure it'll be a technological marvel.Ford
GM
Toyota
VAG
Comment
-
Acura's have been overpriced and underpowered for about as long as they've sold cars. They're not bad cars..hell they are actually very nice.....but they cost more than most cars in their class (Cadillac, Lexus, BMW, Infiniti, etc)...have less power and torque, generally are very dressed up Honda's and are front wheel drive. I'll take a Caddy, Lexus, Infiniti, BMW, Corvette, Viper, Porsche..or just about any other exotic for that kinda money.
Comment
-
Originally posted by UserX View PostToo little, too late. Honda needs to wake up and start making some true enthusiast cars again."Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." - Thomas Jefferson, 1776
Comment
-
Originally posted by Magnus View PostYes."Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." - Thomas Jefferson, 1776
Comment
Comment