I could be wrong, but it looks like the guy had something in his waistband when the were struggling. I believe that is what is laying on the ground besides his two shoes. At 1:41 you can see the individual kick it.
tough to tell what it is.
I could be wrong, but it looks like the guy wrestled the officer's taser way from him. I believe that is what is laying on the ground besides his two shoes. Although the individual appears to have tossed it and then kicked it way I believe that is why he shot him.
But wait, a TASER is supposed to be non-lethal. Not only that, but they're single shot and then you have to change the cartridge.
I could be wrong, but it looks like the guy had something in his waistband when the were struggling. I believe that is what is laying on the ground besides his two shoes. At 1:41 you can see the individual kick it.
tough to tell what it is.
As usual, you're wrong.
"When Saenz pushes off the guard, Flores draws his Glock semi-automatic handgun from his right holster. The guard moves away and Flores fires a single gunshot.
Flores then holsters his gun, pulls his yellow Taser and gets atop of Saenz, who is face down, bleeding from a shoulder and continues to kick for a few seconds until he stops moving as blood spreads on the ground."
Video Shows El Paso Officer Fatally Shooting Prisoner
EDIT: Looks like you rethought your original post and edited it.
The guy was high on bath salts. He supposedly had been tasered 5 times earlier in the day with no effect. They also claim he had been able to move his cuffed hands under his feet, bringing them to the front of his body. Again, earlier in the day. While that may or may not have played in to the actions of the officer that shot him, because they aren't saying whether this particular officer was aware of any of that.
I still say two grown men who can't subdue a handcuffed suspect, and have to resort to shooting him, are fucking PUSSIES, and do not need to be police officers.
Originally posted by BradM
But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
But wait, a TASER is supposed to be non-lethal. Not only that, but they're single shot and then you have to change the cartridge.
Watched it again. Not sure what it is since you can see the officer in the dark uniform actually pull his taser out after he shoots him. I edited my post, not sure what it is.
"When Saenz pushes off the guard, Flores draws his Glock semi-automatic handgun from his right holster. The guard moves away and Flores fires a single gunshot.
Flores then holsters his gun, pulls his yellow Taser and gets atop of Saenz, who is face down, bleeding from a shoulder and continues to kick for a few seconds until he stops moving as blood spreads on the ground."
Ok genius, watch the video you can see the individual toss something and then he kicks it away from him at 1:41. How am I wrong? You do see that third item laying on the ground?
Not justifying the shooting, just trying to see why the officer even pulled his gun and shot him.
Ok genius, watch the video you can see the individual toss something and then he kicks it away from him at 1:41. How am I wrong? You do see that third item laying on the ground?
Read the rest of my post, Einstein.
Originally posted by BradM
But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
The huffington post article and video are 100x better than the original linked article. The officer does fire at the exact moment his arm gets hit by the officer in tan. I don't think it's a coincidence he fires at that exact moment. Looks to me like an accident. It doesn't justify the shooting in any way just looks like poor handling of a firearm and some major officer training issues combined with an idiot on bath salts.
Comment