Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2013 GT500 - 9.95 @ 142mph

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • For comparisons sake :

    http://www.RoadTestTV.com A 2012 Camaro ZL1 modified by Redline Motorsports makes a 10.23 @ 138 mph 1/4 mile pass at the Street Car Drags Event held at Palm ...


    Mods including a big stall/auto - "The ZL1′s mods performed by Redline Motorsports include a larger ATI drive pulley and a smaller LPE supercharger pulley to increase boost as well as a ported blower snout. The stock LSA camshaft which has 198/216-degrees of duration and .492/.480-inches of lift was tossed in favor of a custom camshaft ground by Comp Cams which has 231/248 degrees of duration @ 50. The custom cam was mated to 7.400-inch long pushrods and Redline’s double valvesprings with titanium retainers. The stock exhaust manifolds were replaced with American Racing’s long tube headers with 1 7/8-inch primaries. Behind the headers, Redline installed an X-pipe and high-flow cats while keeping the balance of the exhaust stock. The ZL1 was also treated to a cold air intake, larger heat exchanger, a set of Injector Dynamics 98 lb/hr (at 68psi) injectors and NGK TR6 spark plugs. The car still maintains its stock 1.9 L blower, stock block and stock heads. To get the ZL1 out of the hole, it was fitted with a high stall torque converter and Mickey Thompson drag radials."

    From here: Hot News!! New 2012 Camaro ZL1 1/4 mile record set by Redline Motorsports – Road Test TV | RoadTest TV

    Comment


    • Not bad. GM put a baby blower and baby camshaft in that car, so no wonder the power levels are so much lower.

      That Camaro sounded good though.

      320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

      DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

      Comment


      • If the Camaro was about 1k lbs less, I'd probably consider one and just put up with the ugly.

        The Shelby could be lighter too but at least it's under 4k.

        Comment


        • The Shelby could be lighter too but at least it's under 4k.
          And it looks 10x better than the slowmaro!
          "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." - Thomas Jefferson, 1776

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Rick Modena View Post
            OK and the ZL1 has 6.2L (379-384CI) vs. 5.8L (354-361CI), we could be here all day old timer...
            The Cobra has 4 valve heads and a 800rpm higher redline.

            I do wonder what the 6.2 would do with a 2.3 TVS blower? Oh wait, GM already knows. It's 638 SAE rated horsepower at 10.5psi on the ZR1.

            Does anyone think the LS9 couldn't crank out more than 662 SAE rated horsepower at 15psi like the GT500 is running? Me thinks an extra 4.5 psi would generate more than 24 horsepower, quite a bit more. So, that really begs the question on why the GT500 doesn't make more than 662 with it's 7,000rpm redline and 4 valve heads, etc. Does, the extra .4 of displacement make that big of a difference even with a pushrod 16 valve set-up?
            Ford
            GM
            Toyota
            VAG

            Comment


            • Originally posted by quikag View Post
              The Cobra has 4 valve heads and a 800rpm higher redline.

              I do wonder what the 6.2 would do with a 2.3 TVS blower? Oh wait, GM already knows. It's 638 SAE rated horsepower at 10.5psi on the ZR1.

              Does anyone think the LS9 couldn't crank out more than 662 SAE rated horsepower at 15psi like the GT500 is running? Me thinks an extra 4.5 psi would generate more than 24 horsepower, quite a bit more. So, that really begs the question on why the GT500 doesn't make more than 662 with it's 7,000rpm redline and 4 valve heads, etc. Does, the extra .4 of displacement make that big of a difference even with a pushrod 16 valve set-up?
              You sure do like making blatantly ignorant comments.
              Originally posted by PGreenCobra
              I can't get over the fact that you get to go live the rest of your life, knowing that someone made a Halloween costume out of you. LMAO!!
              Originally posted by Trip McNeely
              Originally posted by dsrtuckteezy
              dont downshift!!
              Go do a whooly in front of a Peterbilt.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by DON SVO View Post
                You sure do like making blatantly ignorant comments.
                Please elaborate on my ignorant comments. Please show me where ANYTHING I said is not accurate.

                I look forward to reading your enlightened word, oh great one.
                Ford
                GM
                Toyota
                VAG

                Comment


                • Originally posted by quikag View Post
                  So, that really begs the question on why the GT500 doesn't make more than 662 with it's 7,000rpm redline and 4 valve heads, etc.
                  Neither car was a max effort production. Compromises exist in both.
                  In this case, Ford's compromised bar is just higher than Chevy's.

                  Does, the extra .4 of displacement make that big of a difference even with a pushrod 16 valve set-up?
                  According to the laws of thermodynamics, it does. It's not as critical in an FI application, but the effect is still mathematically significant.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by quikag View Post
                    Please elaborate on my ignorant comments. Please show me where ANYTHING I said is not accurate.

                    I look forward to reading your enlightened word, oh great one.
                    LOL I'll just let someone else do it for me

                    Originally posted by Rlhay2 View Post
                    Neither car was a max effort production. Compromises exist in both.
                    In this case, Ford's compromised bar is just higher than Chevy's.



                    According to the laws of thermodynamics, it does. It's not as critical in an FI application, but the effect is still mathematically significant.
                    Originally posted by PGreenCobra
                    I can't get over the fact that you get to go live the rest of your life, knowing that someone made a Halloween costume out of you. LMAO!!
                    Originally posted by Trip McNeely
                    Originally posted by dsrtuckteezy
                    dont downshift!!
                    Go do a whooly in front of a Peterbilt.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Rlhay2 View Post
                      Neither car was a max effort production. Compromises exist in both.
                      In this case, Ford's compromised bar is just higher than Chevy's.



                      According to the laws of thermodynamics, it does. It's not as critical in an FI application, but the effect is still mathematically significant.
                      sup andrew.. whats shakin?
                      2016 250 Mini dozer

                      No matter how fast light travels it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by White_lightning View Post
                        sup andrew.. whats shakin?
                        Not quite. I only took a few years of thermo to get my degree.

                        Andrew considers thermodynamics, "some light reading before bed".

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Rlhay2 View Post
                          Not quite. I only took a few years of thermo to get my degree.

                          Andrew considers thermodynamics, "some light reading before bed".
                          drew:" i was bored last night.. so i read the internet.... all of it... and then spent this morning firing out emails correcting everyone.. this one idiot... steven hawkings or something had his theory of worm holes and space time all wrong..."


                          2016 250 Mini dozer

                          No matter how fast light travels it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it.

                          Comment


                          • How is our old friend Drew doing...
                            Originally posted by Silverback
                            Look all you want, she can't find anyone else who treats her as bad as I do, and I keep her self esteem so low, she wouldn't think twice about going anywhere else.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by quikag View Post
                              The Cobra has 4 valve heads and a 800rpm higher redline.

                              I do wonder what the 6.2 would do with a 2.3 TVS blower? Oh wait, GM already knows. It's 638 SAE rated horsepower at 10.5psi on the ZR1.

                              Does anyone think the LS9 couldn't crank out more than 662 SAE rated horsepower at 15psi like the GT500 is running? Me thinks an extra 4.5 psi would generate more than 24 horsepower, quite a bit more. So, that really begs the question on why the GT500 doesn't make more than 662 with it's 7,000rpm redline and 4 valve heads, etc. Does, the extra .4 of displacement make that big of a difference even with a pushrod 16 valve set-up?
                              How much more power does a 6.0ls make over a 5.7ls? Or a 302 vs 331?

                              The ls9 is a bad bitch, but so is fords new 5.8.

                              If-if-if-if ford used a modified coyote head on thier current 6.2l truck engine and put a blower on it, how much power do you think it would make? I think a lot.

                              Not that this holds any weight, but I was reading an article in a truck magazine, it was the raptor engine (6.2l) vs the silverado (6.2l). Bone stock the ford made more power and torque by a conserible amount and it made the power lower in the rpm range.. So they put the same supercharger kit (centrifugal) on each truck, same boost ect.. And fords made a retarded amount more power them the GM, something like 50+ hp and Torque.. And that's ford SOHC, I wonder what It would do with DOHC VVT?

                              GM 6.2l is a nasty motor, OCII proved that to me in the "FRIDGE" for headers and a tune + w/e else it was moving for a big heavy pick up.

                              320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

                              DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
                                How much more power does a 6.0ls make over a 5.7ls? Or a 302 vs 331?

                                The ls9 is a bad bitch, but so is fords new 5.8.
                                You do know this isn't a new 5.8L, right?
                                Originally posted by PGreenCobra
                                I can't get over the fact that you get to go live the rest of your life, knowing that someone made a Halloween costume out of you. LMAO!!
                                Originally posted by Trip McNeely
                                Originally posted by dsrtuckteezy
                                dont downshift!!
                                Go do a whooly in front of a Peterbilt.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X