![](http://www.mustangevolution.com/forum/users/35569-albums4667-30041.jpg)
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Random car thread.
Collapse
X
-
The 2016 is 1.2" shorter (nose to tail), 2" shorter wheel base, 1.4" wider, 4.3" taller and weigh 28lbs less.
But thats just numbers. They eyes will see what they want to see.Good judgment comes from bad decisions and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LaserSVT View PostThe 2016 is 1.2" shorter (nose to tail), 2" shorter wheel base, 1.4" wider, 4.3" taller and weigh 28lbs less.
But thats just numbers. They eyes will see what they want to see.Last edited by lowfast; 08-25-2015, 05:57 AM.1965 Ford Falcon Pro-Touring Project
TCI F/R Suspension, 3V-4.6 & TR3560, LT III Wheels
sigpic
Work In Progress
Comment
-
-
Yeah the first gen cars were much smaller and I wasn't arguing that. But they are smaller in most specs when compared to the 71-73s. And yes, the fully equipped GT weighs 3705 but remove the premium package and Shaker system and larger wheels/brakes and that drops it below the base weight of the 71GT. I haven't looked up the 73 Mustangs which I know are heavier/bigger.Good judgment comes from bad decisions and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LaserSVT View PostYeah the first gen cars were much smaller and I wasn't arguing that. But they are smaller in most specs when compared to the 71-73s. And yes, the fully equipped GT weighs 3705 but remove the premium package and Shaker system and larger wheels/brakes and that drops it below the base weight of the 71GT. I haven't looked up the 73 Mustangs which I know are heavier/bigger.1965 Ford Falcon Pro-Touring Project
TCI F/R Suspension, 3V-4.6 & TR3560, LT III Wheels
sigpic
Work In Progress
Comment
-
Originally posted by lowfast View PostI agree the 71-73's are boats and heavy but they still have a sleeker, if that is the right word, look than the newer stangs when parked side by side. The current cars fastback look does help vs the last gen. I feel the new generation Mustang, Camaro, and Challenger could all shrink about 10%-15% in every dimension and they would look more sporting, and if they could drop the same 10% in weight that would be even better.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lowfast View PostI agree the 71-73's are boats and heavy but they still have a sleeker, if that is the right word, look than the newer stangs when parked side by side. The current cars fastback look does help vs the last gen. I feel the new generation Mustang, Camaro, and Challenger could all shrink about 10%-15% in every dimension and they would look more sporting, and if they could drop the same 10% in weight that would be even better.
Comment
Comment