Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2013 Viper GTS

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Steve View Post
    I guess that makes perfect sense since a 1450rw Supra and a 750hp GTR's are pretty low key and won't attract any attention at all. lmao.
    Compared to a stock Gallardo all my cars are very low key IMO. My Supra doesn't get much attention at all unless its at a car meet.

    the new Viper has my attention. As of now I have other financial priorities will prevent me from getting an expensive hobby car for a few years most likely.

    TTG, big built GTR, Viper, etc.... won't be around me for a good while.

    I'll continue to toy with my Fox body and Supra. If I can afford it I'll buy another V to throw wheels and bolt ons as a daily.
    -1997 Supra- mid 8 second street car
    -1993 Cobra- 700rw
    -2012 CTS-V- 9 second daily driver
    -1991 Coupe- LSA/TT/4L80 in the making
    -2007 GSXR 1000- built turbo bike

    Comment


    • #62
      Dinosaur tech? Didn't the Viper V10 start as a 318 with two extra cylinders? lol
      When the government pays, the government controls.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Junkie View Post

        I'll continue to toy with my Fox body and Supra. If I can afford it I'll buy another V to throw wheels and bolt ons as a daily.
        Lol at bolt ons. Yep bolt on 300shot, bolt on cam, bolt on smaller pulley....
        2012 GT500

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by 46Tbird View Post
          Dinosaur tech? Didn't the Viper V10 start as a 318 with two extra cylinders? lol
          agreed... Matt's just being stubborn.

          Besides, their other cars have "semi-hemis"... if they are too much of a pussy of a company to take the best V8 ever built and bring it up to date and make a REAL bad ass Viper, then be bitches and build a stroker version of their 392 motor thats making already bad ass power... A 520-550 inch "semi-hemi" based on their newer 392 tech would make 600-650 wheel easily, pass smog, probably get better mpg than the truck motor, weigh less, and be over-all bad ass... plus it wouldn't sound like a damn delivery truck. With that long ass hood it'd almost be a front mounted mid engine car, with the motor behind the front wheels...

          Comment


          • #65
            I think this is the first ground up new car that Chrysler has done since the bankruptcy. Very nice. Me likey.

            Comment


            • #66
              ZR1>viper
              2010 F-350 6.4L SRW CC 4X4

              Spartan tunes, 5 inch flo-pro, 4 inch down pipe, cold side piping, AFE stage 2 CAI, EGR delete, Air Dog II

              2012 Mustang 5.0 GT Stock........for now.

              Comment


              • #67
                I don't think a 500+ci motor making 640hp is anything impressive. A coyote architecture 8.4L would theoretically make over 700. The V10 is a turd. Otherwise I dig the looks.

                Sent from my Super Schweet G2
                1988GT DSS pro bullet 306,pp track heat heads, pp downs box intake, TFS stage II cam, S-trim 13lbs, 503/461
                2002 VTX 1800C Chopped and Raked
                2000 F250 4x4 PSD
                2012 Ford Exploder
                www.fquick.com/payne5757
                www.myspace.com/payne5757

                Comment


                • #68
                  I like it, but it kinda reminds me of a stretched out RX8.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by payne5757 View Post
                    i don't think a 500+ci motor making 640hp is anything impressive. A coyote architecture 8.4l would theoretically make over 700. The v10 is a turd.
                    lol.
                    When the government pays, the government controls.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by payne5757 View Post
                      I don't think a 500+ci motor making 640hp is anything impressive. A coyote architecture 8.4L would theoretically make over 700. The V10 is a turd. Otherwise I dig the looks.

                      Sent from my Super Schweet G2
                      Well then we should build one using b18c1 architecture and it would make 910hp at 8.4ltrs. That motor isn't even trying and it makes that kind of power.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        i think it looks sexy as hell. i have always liked the viper

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Junkie View Post
                          Compared to a stock Gallardo all my cars are very low key IMO. My Supra doesn't get much attention at all unless its at a car meet.

                          the new Viper has my attention. As of now I have other financial priorities will prevent me from getting an expensive hobby car for a few years most likely.

                          TTG, big built GTR, Viper, etc.... won't be around me for a good while.

                          I'll continue to toy with my Fox body and Supra. If I can afford it I'll buy another V to throw wheels and bolt ons as a daily.
                          So did you sell the Caddy ??

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by CRASH View Post
                            So did you sell the Caddy ??
                            He did, but he's going to get another one but I believe it will be a wagon this time.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              The weakest link of the Vipers has been the interior.
                              It appears that has been fixed.

                              Originally posted by payne5757 View Post
                              I don't think a 500+ci motor making 640hp is anything impressive. A coyote architecture 8.4L would theoretically make over 700. The V10 is a turd. Otherwise I dig the looks.
                              Not exactly accurate.
                              Thermodynamic efficiency goes down as engine size increases.

                              Originally posted by Steve View Post
                              He did, but he's going to get another one but I believe it will be a wagon this time.
                              Slightly stalker-ish...

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by Rlhay2 View Post

                                Slightly stalker-ish...
                                LOL, nah. I talk to Will on a pretty often basis and he's always very cool about sharing his hobby stuff. He's good people.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X