Police shooting caught on camera

[Trick Pony]

Don't be mad, bro.

I get a dog is treated more or less equally, but they are also trained to do things humans cannot or will not do, whether it's catching someone or subduing them. That option was not used when it easily could have been. Cops lives are at risk all the time. If a K9 is indeed equal it too should be put in life threatening situations and do what it was trained to do. If the dog cannot subdue then yes, fire at will. Like I said, if the dog wasn't at the ready then kill him with everything available.

The point is, the dude was holding a deadly weapon. You don't send an officer in to take him down barehanded in that situation and you wouldn't send the dog in either. You keep referring to other options - they used the tazer and it didn't work. Once the officers have their guns out and pointed at the guy it's a deadly force situation and he forced their hand with his actions.
If I've got a gun on someone who is threatening me with an object like that and they make a move to get within striking distance and act like they are taking a swing, that person is getting shot. Plain and simple.

[DON SVO]

Don't be mad, bro.

I get a dog is treated more or less equally, but they are also trained to do things humans cannot or will not do, whether it's catching someone or subduing them. That option was not used when it easily could have been. Cops lives are at risk all the time. If a K9 is indeed equal it too should be put in life threatening situations and do what it was trained to do. If the dog cannot subdue then yes, fire at will. Like I said, if the dog wasn't at the ready then kill him with everything available.

If the K9 is equal it wouldn't be used, since the human officers tried tasing him and he wasn't affected and still posessed the very weapon he destroyed the restaurant with. Why send in a K9 to a high-percentage casualty situation? Basically, what good does it do to basically roll the dice on the guy killing the dog, all in the name of NOT killing a violent perp? That makes no sense. If the perp lived after killing the dog, he would be jailed for eternity due to killing a LEO.

I want an officer to comment on this, I think it's correct:

You don't send the K9 in if there's reasonable belief that the perp possesses and/or may use a deadly weapon. You see K9s chasing guys down and what-not, but I've never seen a K9 sent after a confrontational perp with a weapon.

[SS Junk]

I want an officer to comment on this, I think it's correct.

It's not. Again, dogs are trained and used to do what humans can not do.

[G..]

It's not. Again, dogs are trained and used to do what humans can not do.

It is correct. Your ignorance is running rampid. Its either the tazer or dog. In a hostile situation with a weapon, with him swiping away the tazer, the dog is not an option. Period. I can arrange for you to meet with any one of our 5 K9 Officers if you would care to ask. You are wrong and just looking plain stupid now.

[Osiris]

If the K9 is equal it wouldn't be used, since the human officers tried tasing him and he wasn't affected and still posessed the very weapon he destroyed the restaurant with. Why send in a K9 to a high-percentage casualty situation? Basically, what good does it do to basically roll the dice on the guy killing the dog, all in the name of NOT killing a violent perp? That makes no sense. If the perp lived after killing the dog, he would be jailed for eternity due to killing a LEO.

I want an officer to comment on this, I think it's correct:

You don't send the K9 in if there's reasonable belief that the perp possesses and/or may use a deadly weapon. You see K9s chasing guys down and what-not, but I've never seen a K9 sent after a confrontational perp with a weapon.

You're absolutely right.

[Craizie]

It's not. Again, dogs are trained and used to do what humans can not do.

You're either a complete idiot, or a troll. I haven't figured out which one just yet...

[Osiris]

SS Junk, you have NO idea about police work. Stop second guessing those guys. From what I've read in those articles and video, they were completely justified. Jesus christ.

[SS Junk]

Where's that video again of dude sitting on his porch, police are lined up with guns drawn in thinking perp is armed. They send in the dog, police think shots are fired and they unload. Even killing their own dog...
Seems to be a matter of opinion from people to different police forces.
Cops never use a dog when there's a suspected deadly weapon...




BTW.. I posted this video awhile ago:

Dog loving vaginas everywhere went ape shit crazy saying it was unjustified. Funny how the mind works...
I mean people crying posting up "OMG HE'S WAGGING TALE! HE JUST WANNA PLAY!"

[Super Coupe]

Some cops just go a little over the top. Sure I think it was justified. But 10 rounds? Lol they either can't shoot and missed or those were some weak guns or they just went a little to far. I watched Greenville cops put over 25 rounds in the side of a truck killing a guy that was running from them. Sure I think it was justified. His truck was a deadly weapon. But come on popping off 25 rounds in the middle of town with people everywhere is almost as bad as the guy running from them.

[racrguy]

Some cops just go a little over the top. Sure I think it was justified. But 10 rounds? Lol they either can't shoot and missed or those were some weak guns or they just went a little to far. I watched Greenville cops put over 25 rounds in the side of a truck killing a guy that was running from them. Sure I think it was justified. His truck was a deadly weapon. But come on popping off 25 rounds in the middle of town with people everywhere is almost as bad as the guy running from them.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting multiple times.

Edit: Goddamn, even the FTP crowd is having to take up for the police. What the fuck is going on here!?

[HarrisonTX]

Some cops just go a little over the top. Sure I think it was justified. But 10 rounds? Lol they either can't shoot and missed or those were some weak guns or they just went a little to far. I watched Greenville cops put over 25 rounds in the side of a truck killing a guy that was running from them. Sure I think it was justified. His truck was a deadly weapon. But come on popping off 25 rounds in the middle of town with people everywhere is almost as bad as the guy running from them.

Only 25 rounds? How many shooters? Say there were 7 Shooters? so each cop fired less than 4 rounds? Were there less cops? Were there only five shooters, and each cop fired 5 times? If they all fire simultaneously, its easy for that shit to add up quick.

do you want them to have some sort of shooting plan where only one guy fires? That insane. If there are 10 cops firing at one guy, I wouldnt be shocked if the dude had 70 bullet holes in him.

[CexMashean]

There's a reason for this:

SS Junk
This message is hidden because SS Junk is on your ignore list.

[GhostTX]

Remember the PA shoot? 3.5 minute gun fight. Suspect took seventeen .40 S&W & .223 rounds and they still had to fight to get him handcuffed!

http://concealedcarryholsters.org/fbi-analysis-on-pa-police-shootout/

The cops knew nothing on this guy other than he was going crazy in a restaurant and he just took a Tazer with no ill-effects.

I'm not going to argue round count.

[krazy kris]

[Craizie]

Where's that video again of dude sitting on his porch, police are lined up with guns drawn in thinking perp is armed. They send in the dog, police think shots are fired and they unload. Even killing their own dog...
Seems to be a matter of opinion from people to different police forces.
Cops never use a dog when there's a suspected deadly weapon...




BTW.. I posted this video awhile ago:

Dog loving vaginas everywhere went ape shit crazy saying it was unjustified. Funny how the mind works...
I mean people crying posting up "OMG HE'S WAGGING TALE! HE JUST WANNA PLAY!"

You're a fucking moron.