Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Speed Comparison: GT vs. F1

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by tribaltalon View Post
    jesus christ. made those GT guys look like they were taking a leisurely drive to the grocery store!

    I dont understand tho, how can those guys do that, at those kinds of speeds, but cant win a Nascar race?
    because they aren't comfortable with momentum, they are point and park drivers........ On an oval the most disturbing part is how long you are actually not using either pedal (coasting). Most R/R's overdrive and overstop the crap out of an oval car.
    pinto gt with wood trim

    Comment


    • #17
      on my best day, I'd probably wreck before the first turn!

      Comment


      • #18
        i forget how hard F1's make a dick!
        _____________________________________________

        Comment


        • #19
          God Dam I Luv F1! come on 2012

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by 4bangen View Post
            on my best day, I'd probably wreck before the first turn!
            you probably would not be a able to get it moving
            http://dfwdirtriders.com/ New Website for the off road peeps

            Comment


            • #21
              what the fuck.

              did i just see tom cruise do some laps in an f1 car and loop a helicopter in the same day?

              Comment


              • #22
                I've heard that F1's produce so much down force that at 150mph they would be able to drive upside down and stay that way.

                Any fact behind this?

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by twicepipes View Post
                  I've heard that F1's produce so much down force that at 150mph they would be able to drive upside down and stay that way.

                  Any fact behind this?
                  Theoretically yes you could drive on the ceiling. The only problem is that they would have to design an engine that would work upside down.

                  A lot of acrobatic/stunt planes still use piston engines (better throttle response, etc) these are modified to fly upside down for extended periods by having additional gas/oil tanks and modified sump system to supply fluids while the engine is upside down.

                  F1 cars already have a dry sump systems using external reservoirs. Water, oil, fuel would all need modifications so they don't drain out and don't lose pressure. I think the biggest problem would be that oil would eventually pool in the cylinders - limiting the amount of timing you want to spend upside down, and possibly requiring your oiling system to need a new sump pickup at the top of the crankcase.

                  A pressurized dry-sump lubricated engines would work fine, particularly if they use any sort of direct injection where the fuel is vaporized as opposed to be sprayed - you'd have to use a pressurized fuel cell as well.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Chuck AAron is a bad mofo, he's the only one who's got a certification to low level acrobatics in a helicopter. I'd love to have his job

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by scootro View Post
                      Theoretically yes you could drive on the ceiling. The only problem is that they would have to design an engine that would work upside down.

                      A lot of acrobatic/stunt planes still use piston engines (better throttle response, etc) these are modified to fly upside down for extended periods by having additional gas/oil tanks and modified sump system to supply fluids while the engine is upside down.

                      F1 cars already have a dry sump systems using external reservoirs. Water, oil, fuel would all need modifications so they don't drain out and don't lose pressure. I think the biggest problem would be that oil would eventually pool in the cylinders - limiting the amount of timing you want to spend upside down, and possibly requiring your oiling system to need a new sump pickup at the top of the crankcase.

                      A pressurized dry-sump lubricated engines would work fine, particularly if they use any sort of direct injection where the fuel is vaporized as opposed to be sprayed - you'd have to use a pressurized fuel cell as well.
                      OR.... Radial engine. that would be a VERY interesting looking F1 car. LOL!
                      Originally posted by Taya Kyle, American Gun
                      There comes a time when honest debate, serious diplomatic efforts, and logical arguments have been exhausted and only men and women willing to take up arms against evil will suffice to save the freedom of a nation or continent.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Next year....1.6 turbo engines for F1.......can't wait to hear that fucker SING!

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Justa4Banger View Post
                          Next year....1.6 turbo engines for F1.......can't wait to hear that fucker SING!
                          couple thousand less RPM than this year and it's a six cylinder. I don't think it's gonna sound nearly as good.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Holy shit
                            Originally posted by davbrucas
                            I want to like Slow99 since people I know say he's a good guy, but just about everything he posts is condescending and passive aggressive.

                            Most people I talk to have nothing but good things to say about you, but you sure come across as a condescending prick. Do you have an inferiority complex you've attempted to overcome through overachievement? Or were you fondled as a child?

                            You and slow99 should date. You both have passive aggressiveness down pat.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Money CAN buy happiness.
                              Putting warheads on foreheads since 2004

                              Pro-Touring Build

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by TENGRAM View Post
                                couple thousand less RPM than this year and it's a six cylinder. I don't think it's gonna sound nearly as good.
                                I completely agree. Im sure it won't sound bad but an NA v8 at 18k rpm is about the best sound you could ever ask for
                                www.hppmotorsports.com
                                ᶘ ᵒᴥᵒᶅ

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X