Discuss.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Self defense or murder?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Steve View PostThe one who was shot didn't have the gun.Wanna see my care face???
Comment
-
Originally posted by Blakeski View PostI understand that, but when your in a situation where you facing two guys and you see a gun, you are gonna act on instinct and try to get both of them. Just close your eyes and put yourself in that guys shoes. He had all those women around him and didn't want any innocent people getting hurt.
Comment
-
I see the argument for not guilty. But legally, I understand the jury's view - the immediate threat was eliminated after the first shot (or volley of shots). At the point where the citizen chased after the second suspect, he extended himself beyond just defending himself and innocent third parties and got into chase/aprehend mode. After he gave chase, he returned and popped the kid five times. If the kid was so much of a threat, why did the guy chose to disengage, chase suspect number 2, then return? If suspect number 1 was still enough of a threat to require being shot five more times, the guy should've stayed and covered him instead of chasing number 2.
Also, self defense doctrine is "shoot to stop". Once the suspect has gone down, you may not be justified in shooting him additional times.
Why did the citizen need two guns? Was he some kind of wanna-be Dirty Harry? Juries take a hard look at intent. Is it normal for a CHL holder to carry two guns or was this guy looking for a chance to kill somebody?
I don't agree with a life sentence.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Steve View PostUnderstandable about the first shot. But going back 46 seconds later and putting 5 more into a guy with no gun is where it's gets to be a complicated matter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jluv View PostAt the end of the day, he would have never been put in that situation if the punk hadn't have broken the law by participating in armed robbery. It's not like the pharmacist initiated anything or went out and shot an innocent kid.
This guy looks like he is already pained by the idea of killing a person, let alone a teenager. I feel like that is punishment enough to live with that. He really doesn't look like he handles it well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jluv View PostAt the end of the day, he would have never been put in that situation if the punk hadn't have broken the law by participating in armed robbery. It's not like the pharmacist initiated anything or went out and shot an innocent kid.Whos your Daddy?
Comment
Comment