Tweet
-
-
Both, dude. They're not as comparatively fast as they were for their time, but there's just something cool about 'em I feel in my core. The gas mileage is scary bad, though.ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh -
yea, i remember riding in the neighbor's new one back in 1990 and it felt mean as hell. How did they compare to the GMC Syclone?Comment
-
this truck is sex
Comment
-
it couldnt shake a cyclone pecker after it pissedOriginally posted by 78X View Postfirst class white trashComment
-
They have the "potential" to be quick, but stock they were slow as shit, and have absolutely atrocious gas mileageComment
-
-
Flacos truck is a beast, I think he's in the 8.0's now in the quarter.Doing enough racing for 99% of the board!Comment
-
stock they were turd's, the heads didn't flow anything, they made only a few more horsepower than the small block. The only thing going for them was a bunch of torque from what I remember.Comment
-
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come.
-Victor HugoComment
-
Good starting point. I'd put on some heads, and cam, and call it done.DE OPPRESSO LIBER
Comment
-
Not even in the ballpark. Twice as heavy and half as powerful (not really but you get the point). Syclone was a bad ass. 454SS was just ass.Originally posted by 78X View PostGood judgment comes from bad decisions and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.Comment
-
Yep. 120hp and 500ft lbs of torque at 1300rpm. The stock heads on those trucks are shit.Comment
-
Something about those red interiors I liked.
A_______B________I________D_______EComment
-
Comment