WOW!! Did anyone catch the news tonight?

[dsrtuckteezy]

cops should stick to enforcing the law, not trying to interpret it. hahah

[BradM]

Laws are about interpretations. We have convicted a guy of unlawful restraint who boxed a lady in at a grocery store parking lot. How is this any different BradM?

Sounds like he needed a better lawyer.

[347Mike]

Both of you have the cocky ass untouchable attitude in this thread, acting like you can't be touched, cops aren't going to do anything, blah blah blah. Just like the dsrtuckteezy douche. At least, that's the way I've perceived what I've read, and perception is reality.


I know, jackass. Mis type on my part.

You calling anyone cocky is a pretty bold statement coming from you. I stated my position early in this thread. I don't agree that they blocked the road but hearing people constantly say they will plow through this group is retarded. I guess that makes me cocky? So be it.

Did you even read my first 3-4 and 5 posts? I stated very specifically. What gets annoying is thinking anyone has the right to run someone over. There was a thread in the Picture and Video Forum also where someone was run off the road practically. I voiced my same opinion there. I guess I was cocky in that thread too?

If thinking a cop committing illegal acts ie running through a group of people is justice or legal makes me cocky then so be it. I am not siding with the stunting side or even this group. But I am not ont he side of RUN everyone over attitude.

[BradM]

This is the offense:



§ 42.03. OBSTRUCTING HIGHWAY OR OTHER PASSAGEWAY. (a) A
person commits an offense if, without legal privilege or authority,
he intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly:
(1) obstructs a highway, street, sidewalk, railway,
waterway, elevator, aisle, hallway, entrance, or exit to which the
public or a substantial group of the public has access, or any other
place used for the passage of persons, vehicles, or conveyances,
regardless of the means of creating the obstruction and whether the
obstruction arises from his acts alone or from his acts and the acts
of others; or
(2) disobeys a reasonable request or order to move
issued by a person the actor knows to be or is informed is a peace
officer, a fireman, or a person with authority to control the use of
the premises:
(A) to prevent obstruction of a highway or any of
those areas mentioned in Subdivision (1); or
(B) to maintain public safety by dispersing those
gathered in dangerous proximity to a fire, riot, or other hazard.
(b) For purposes of this section, "obstruct" means to render
impassable or to render passage unreasonably inconvenient or
hazardous.
(c) An offense under this section is a Class B misdemeanor.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974.
Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, § 1.01, eff. Sept. 1,
1994.

[bcoop]

You calling anyone cocky is a pretty bold statement coming from you. I stated my position early in this thread. I don't agree that they blocked the road but hearing people constantly say they will plow through this group is retarded. I guess that makes me cocky? So be it.

Did you even read my first 3-4 and 5 posts? I stated very specifically. What gets annoying thinking anyone has the right to run someone over. There was a thread in the Picture and Video Forum also where someone was run off the road practically. I voiced my same opinion there. I guess I was cocky in that thread too?

if me thinking a cop committing illegal acts ie running through a group of people is justice or legal is cocky then so be it again. I am not siding with the stunting side or even this group. But I am not ont he side of RUN everyone over attitude.

There is a fine line between cocky, and douchebag. I'll go back and re-read. You two lovers with the same avatar are difficult to keep up with when posting from a phone. lol

[Machx2]

Sounds like he needed a better lawyer.

Maybe. If you say someone is free to get out of their car in a highway thats crazy. Where would they go? Walk to the nearest off ramp? They are not free to go as they please. 42.03 is another charge ontop of it in my opinion.

[Skidmark]

There is a fine line between cocky, and douchebag. I'll go back and re-read. You two lovers with the same avatar are difficult to keep up with when posting from a phone. lol

Don't be hating!

[bcoop]

Don't be hating!

haha, yours is broke bitch!

[347Mike]

Don't be hating!

His is bigger (no homo) and actually animated. Noob.

[bcoop]

His is bigger

Yes, it is. Sirry Asians.

[Skidmark]

haha, yours is broke bitch!

Bah, I can't copy yours.

[Steve]

Brent, you should armbar them all. That will teach them a lesson.

[bcoop]

Bah, I can't copy yours.

I'm special.

Brent, you should armbar them all. That will teach them a lesson.

I'll just wait til they both show up at an event, and run them over as they pull in the parking lot.

[Silverback]

For the record, anyone does have the "right" to plow through a group of bikers blocking the road.

That doesn't mean they won't be prosecuted for their actions.

I have the right to run around the streets naked yelling, "my dick is on fire!", but that doesn't mean I won't be arrested for public nudity, and distrubing the peace.

[347Mike]

For the record, anyone does have the "right" to plow through a group of bikers blocking the road.

That doesn't mean they won't be prosecuted for their actions.

I have the right to run around the streets naked yelling, "my dick is on fire!", but that doesn't mean I won't be arrested for public nudity, and distrubing the peace.

I think you are using the word very loosely.

I have the right to protest and scream ridiculous things like Westboro Baptist if I wanted to but the difference is one is illegal and one isn't.

When I think of rights I think of legal boundaries.