Suit over national day or prayer dimissed...

[exlude]

Tweedle, by your own standards you lost this before it even started. You're very first post was calling people stupid. Thus the hypocrisy I mentioned earlier that you've been too inept to catch. This has been no debate, just me reminding you, as one of many, that you are no one to be labeling anyone as such.

Must be embarrassing to have attained, in these few short months, the same stigmas and standards you had on the old board that had you wanting to change your name.

[SMEGMA STENCH]

I don't recall. I don't think I ever said "Exlude, you stoopid!!" early on in the thread like you're saying. So I can't say I know where you're coming up with that. You seem to argue better than most of the people around here so even if I think you're a little misguided and have an undeserved superiority complex, that doesn't mean I think you're stupid.

Now if you're referring to my broad generalizations that I'm so fond of, I guess you didn't read the entire thread. As it was established that there is in fact more than one type of atheist. I was already sort of aware of that, but I wasn't sure that everyone here who was claiming to be an atheist was. I have only heard the difference referred to as "strong atheism" and "weak atheism". It would seem that the kind that are "stupid" are racecardouche and his ilk. Vardette is treading near there with his "magical man in the sky" comments. Although I still have to stand by the literal definition of an atheist, and my assessment that there needs to be a better term (which I'm sure there already is) to describe the other "atheists". Which again, going by the literal definition, there seems to be only one actual atheist here. As the definition does not seem to go into allowing for proof.

And uh, I just didn't want to be one of those whiny people crying about their lost post count. I don't want to be grouped in with those who care about something that insignificant. So I opted not to participate in that. I like to think that I have worth far outside of how many posts I have on some website somewhere on teh internets

[exlude]

Well, there always agnosticism which accepts the possibility of a god but explicitly says there is no way we can know.

I think I fall under the traditional definition of atheist in that I truly do not believe there is a god. I can accept that god is a possibility, however, I don't see that as falling outside the definition of atheism. I don't think that qualifies wholly as agnostic either, because I see it as a possibility to prove gods existence and, more remotely, disprove it eventually.

One thing I am more adamant on, I don't believe the Bible to be a history book. Good moral stories and guidance, some sprinkling of historical events, but mostly folklore.

[VaderTT]

Gotta love a Wikipedia search moron. That's why innernet forums are so much fun, we get to see less than mediocrity from such retards on a steady basis.

You sir are a useless faggot!!!!! I shal not address you anymore!

[The King]

Is that a promise? Did it really only take your moronic ass only five whole days to compose such a grade school level retort?

Just think, if you'd have devoted a couple more days you might could have figured out how to include one of the queer smilies you wuv so much.