Suit over national day or prayer dimissed...

[SMEGMA STENCH]

Yeah actually you got that wrong. Now don't try to backpedal and get out of it... haha

Oh crap... didn't end that sentence with a period. Here we go again...

No, despite your desperate attempts to analyze something deeper, it's simply funny when a moron fucks up something simple when trying to insult someone's intelligence.

As the meme once went, "your stupied".

There's no need to attempt to analyze something deeper, when its always jumped right off the page at me. Its not that deep. Its actually pretty obvious to people that read your posts, and if you'd actually read their replies instead of just trying to find the best way to defend yourself and try to be the spelling police again, you'd realize this. Everyone here knows you're notorious for this. I can't believe you'd actually think that people don't notice.

I do find it odd you completely jumped my original point of your hypocrisy in favor of the backpedal.

Please outline for me, any hypocrisy that wasn't discussed in full in this thread.

[Forever_frost]

Not true.

Namely in plants, bacteria, and insects. Nothing in mammals that we have found yet, which tends to be the crutch that creationists hold on to. Unfortunately, we have not been studying it long enough to see macro evolution in mammals. But if you look at organisms with the much faster reproduction rates, we absolutely, 100% see it in nature.

Not only that, but the only logical result of microevolution is macroevolution.

But I'm just a third grader who hasn't learned the alphabet, I don't have a BS in Biology or anything.

So what you are saying, is you have faith based on what you have read in a book. You have no personal experience with evolution but you trust those who say they do. Right? And I have a BS in Criminal justice and will graduate with a masters in psychology but I'm not Sherlock Holmes now am I?

[exlude]

Maybe you should stick to CJ then? And no, I've actually had hands on with polyploidyism as well as transcription error rates. Outside of an Intro to Bio class, CJ nor Psych cover a whole lot of Evo last I checked.

Tweedle, you are alone here. Just look at how many people see you as an idiot...

You're JustinSN95 aren't you? I remember an equally moronic rhetoric when I asked you to prove something with more than a Geocities reference.

[Forever_frost]

Exlude, I'm pointing out that a bachelors degree does not make you an expert any more than a bachelors degree in criminal justice makes me an attorney. You seem to get upset that I'm pointing out your belief in the theory of evolution requires just as much faith, if not more, than my belief in God.

[SMEGMA STENCH]

Maybe you should stick to CJ then? And no, I've actually had hands on with polyploidyism as well as transcription error rates. Outside of an Intro to Bio class, CJ nor Psych cover a whole lot of Evo last I checked.

Tweedle, you are alone here. Just look at how many people see you as an idiot...

You're JustinSN95 aren't you? I remember an equally moronic rhetoric when I asked you to prove something with more than a Geocities reference.

I guess you can add the fact that you're a blind man to the list. Do you just skip over the other posts that hold the opposite point of view? I know damn well how many people see me as an idiot. The fact that you point this out only lends more credence to my theory of your undeserved superiority complex. Just don't think you're fooling anyone. Cause you're not. And WTF is geocites? Although I'm pretty sure even multiple PHD's wouldn't add up to enough "proof" for someone who's as "smart" as you LOL. You're not nearly as smart as you think you are dude, and its laughably obvious to the rest of us.

[exlude]

Exlude, I'm pointing out that a bachelors degree does not make you an expert any more than a bachelors degree in criminal justice makes me an attorney. You seem to get upset that I'm pointing out your belief in the theory of evolution requires just as much faith, if not more, than my belief in God.

Well you surely know more about criminal law than I do, which is my point. I'm no expert on evolution, but I'm far more educated and experienced with it than 99% of this board. In case you missed my discussion with Denny, I agree that there is faith in science. But we have witnessed evolution. Enough to make it law? Not at all, but your posts were overly simplified. And equating the people who recognize the evidence for evolution to "third graders who don't know the alphabet"? Cmon...

[exlude]

I guess you can add the fact that you're a blind man to the list. Do you just skip over the other posts that hold the opposite point of view? I know damn well how many people see me as an idiot. The fact that you point this out only lends more credence to my theory of your undeserved superiority complex. Just don't think you're fooling anyone. Cause you're not. And WTF is geocites? Although I'm pretty sure even multiple PHD's wouldn't add up to enough "proof" for someone who's as "smart" as you LOL. You're not nearly as smart as you think you are dude, and its laughably obvious to the rest of us.

Don't mistake my expressed superiority over you as a superiority complex. I'm damn sure I'm smarter than you which is all that matters between the two of us. I may be known as a jackass, arrogant, or an asshole, but not as stupid amongst "us".

And who is this "us"? Your multiple personalities.

[exlude]

And you skipped my question, are you/were you JustinSN95?

[VaderTT]

The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.

– Richard Dawkins

It is not as in the Bible, that God created man in his own image. But, on the contrary, man created God in his own image. – Ludwig Feuerbach

[Forever_frost]

Actually, in the Old Testament, we were under the law and when you broke it, you got hammered. Justice was swift and bloody. Under the New, we have grace. Kind of like going before a judge with an attorney

[SMEGMA STENCH]

Don't mistake my expressed superiority over you as a superiority complex. I'm damn sure I'm smarter than you which is all that matters between the two of us. I may be known as a jackass, arrogant, or an asshole, but not as stupid amongst "us".

And who is this "us"? Your multiple personalities.

You're not smarter than me, I'm afraid. You're not any smarter than most of the people on this board. So be damn sure all you like, it'll never make it true. Unlike you, I feel no need to go around proclaiming my intellect. So to someone like you, I can see where someone not having your self affirming attitude must seem "not smart". In any argument you get into, you never cease trumpeting how smart you are. And I'm not mistaking your wrongfully expressed superiority over me as a complex. I'm taking your wrongfully expressed superiority over most of the people you talk to here, as a complex. Don't feel bad though, as here you'll blend in just fine with all the rest of the would be intellectuals.

The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.

– Richard Dawkins

I never liked Dawkins because he can't grasp that a god is not a human. He puts human characteristics and personifications on something that clearly be.. not human.

[exlude]

You're not smarter than me, I'm afraid. You're not any smarter than most of the people on this board. So be damn sure all you like, it'll never make it true. Unlike you, I feel no need to go around proclaiming my intellect. So to someone like you, I can see where someone not having your self affirming attitude must seem "not smart". In any argument you get into, you never cease trumpeting how smart you are. And I'm not mistaking your wrongfully expressed superiority over me as a complex. I'm taking your wrongfully expressed superiority over most of the people you talk to here, as a complex. Don't feel bad though, as here you'll blend in just fine with all the rest of the would be intellectuals.

And as has been realized over and over, you're too stupid to realize you're stupid. Of course, people don't blame you for this.

They just let you know you're stupid. I'm sure you rationalize this by thinking that everyone who tells you you're stupid is in turn stupid because you're mother would never lie to you!

I must be right about the JustinSN95, as you continue to dodge the question. It would very much answer why you are Paladin light.

[VaderTT]

I never liked Dawkins because he can't grasp that a god is not a human. He puts human characteristics and personifications on something that clearly be.. not human.

No you can't grasp that god is a fictonal character made up by man to take the blame off of our mistakes. I.E. " why did this happen? OOOHHH IDK I guess its just gods way." lol

But I do respect theat you firmly believe in something. I usually don't talk religion or politics though for this reason.


It is not as in the Bible, that God created man in his own image. But, on the contrary, man created God in his own image.

– Ludwig Feuerbach

[SMEGMA STENCH]

And as has been realized over and over, you're too stupid to realize you're stupid. Of course, people don't blame you for this.

They just let you know you're stupid. I'm sure you rationalize this by thinking that everyone who tells you you're stupid is in turn stupid because you're mother would never lie to you!

I must be right about the JustinSN95, as you continue to dodge the question. It would very much answer why you are Paladin light.

And now we come to the end of the debate. When the losing side has to resort to name calling cause he can't come up with an actual argument to facilitate his point. Man for someone who is so "smart" (haha) you really don't show it. As for being justinsn95, I could be one of a great many people who you failed to impress by being a know it all. I guess you'll never really know will you?

I can see your next reply already. Essentially: "You stupid!! You stupid!!" ROFL..greatness. Do yourself a favor and slink away in shame while you still have any form of dignity left.

No you can't grasp that god is a fictonal character made up by man to take the blame off of our mistakes. I.E. " why did this happen? OOOHHH IDK I guess its just gods way." lol

But I do respect theat you firmly believe in something. I usually don't talk religion or politics though for this reason.

Oh. I can't? I see you didn't actually address the point and lash out with a poor defense of your point of view. Cause after all, if this thread has established anything, its that no one really knows for sure. You must be one of the hater atheists that I've come to love.

[The King]

The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.

– Richard Dawkins

It is not as in the Bible, that God created man in his own image. But, on the contrary, man created God in his own image. – Ludwig Feuerbach

Gotta love a Wikipedia search moron. That's why innernet forums are so much fun, we get to see less than mediocrity from such retards on a steady basis.