Against a newly discovered likelihood the Robert Mueller investigation began under false pretenses; and against the backdrop that FBI surveillance and wiretaps were obtained through materially (intentionally) false representations to the FISA court; and against the backdrop the original Flynn plea judge (Contrereas) was also the approving FISA judge; and that judge ‘was summarily recused’ […]
When the Feds request a postponement of sentencing it is so they still have leverage over the person. No deal is final until you are sentenced.
Either that or with the info coming out about Strzok and Piage along with the illegal nature of how they got the evidence they used in his prosecution, they are gunshy.
Not in Federal court. You are not allowed to withdraw a guilty plea without the judges permission and you sign away your right to appeal when you enter your plea. Federal court is completely stacked against the defendant. They even freeze all of your bank accounts to prevent you from getting a good lawyer and you have to fight them just to get some of your own money released for legal fees. They claim they freeze your accounts to keep you from running even after you post a bond.
Magnus, I am your father. You need to ask your mother about a man named Calvin Klein.
He was charged with making a false statement. The only way they knew it was false was his phone calls were unmasked illegally. Fruit of the poison tree.
< Not a lawyer, but that's what's floating around the interwebs.
Political commentators have been at a loss to explain why former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, who surely knew that he might have been under surveillance, would have lied to the FBI about the contents of his conversations with the Russian ambassador last December. | Politics
Comment