Another car mowing down pedestrians in London

[GhostTX]

Though, it seems it's a white man running over Muslims this time:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/18/europe/urgent---london-vehicle-collision/index.html

[Scott Mc]

Why in the fuck is that article going off like it's a WW3 red alert?

[AnthonyS]

Violence will likely lead to more violence until this gets really out of hand. Loonies are losing their marbles all over the world. I'm going to redouble my efforts to learn and prepare more to protect my family.

[sc281]

Tommy Robinson spitting fire:

[sc281]

We will never know his true motives.
This is a lone wolf. The real victims of this will be white people. This will increase whitephobia.
We need to start getting used to these attacks.



All lines used after an Islamic terror attack.

[sc281]

They just come out and say "white man" with Muslims they have clever little descriptors like "Asian" and "Mediterranean"

Why not say Slavic, Celtic, Saxon, Teutonic, or Baltic?


Also, they come right out and say "terror attack". With Muslims they have clever little euphemisms like "van attack", "shooting", "explosion", and "workplace violence"

Why not call it a Van attack or kinetic vehicular action?


And also, they they come right out and say he was there to kill Muslims after he said "I want to kill all
Muslims". With Muslims the use phrases like "his motives are unclear" and "we may never know his true motives" after they say they want to kill infidels and westerners.

Why not say "we are doing a thorough to ascertain his motives, but we may never know his true motive"?

Now the MSM and social media will use this as an indictment of all White people and Christians. With Muslims they say things like "this has nothing to do with Islam" and "#notallmuslims" and "show tolerance" and "it's their culture, and we have to respect it" and "what's most concerning is how this will affect the Muslim community"

Why not say "This has nothing to do with white people and Christians" and "#notallwhites #notallchristians" and "show tolerance" and "we should be concerned about how this will hurt the white community"?


Does this seem ididotic? It fucking should.


This bastard was a white terrorist who did sick shit to people who were innocent. He deserves to rot in prison for a long time or for a very short time until it is time for him to rot in the literal sense.

Just like Muslim terrorists who did and will do sick shit to people.


Violence against innocents isn't the answer. You want to save the world? Stake out a draw muhammad contest or a Charlie hebdo and wait for some goatfuckers to come with evil on their minds and guns in their hands. Or go fight with the Kurdish Peshmerga or YPK against ISIS. Or wait for a declared war and enlist.

Then have the fuck at it.


With all that being said, this is a further failure of govt.

When the govt brings into the country a group of people whose state goal on the whole is to conquer the west, wage jihad, and enslave the kaffir. When the terrorists are radicalized out of the mosques, When these mosques are not investigated and and shut down after terrorist attacks, When the govt actively supports, promotes, and subborns their actions, and when this cycle of terror keeps repeating - you can't help but imagine someone might break and try to wage little jihad of his own.

And the only place there is to lash out at are the breeding grounds of Islamic extremism - mosques. Mosques that, among the potential terrorists, also receive hundreds of innocent people. This is how innocent lives are lost.


By investigating and rounding up the terrorists and their hate preachers who espouse the ideology, govt does a twice good thing. Protecting the non Muslims from the terrorists and at the same time protecting the innocent Muslims from the backlash of their terrorist sects.

If only.

[sc281]

The real threat is the backlash against innocent Muslims white people. They are the real victims.

https://mobile.twitter.com/jackposobiec/status/876784426876887041

[sc281]

The double standard: