Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trump going to turn EPA on it's ear

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Trump going to turn EPA on it's ear

    Donald Trump has selected one of the best-known climate skeptics to lead his U.S. EPA transition team, according to two sources close to the campaign.

    Myron Ebell, director of the Center for Energy and Environment at the conservative Competitive Enterprise Institute, is spearheading Trump’s transition plans for EPA, the sources said.



    Ebell is a well-known and polarizing figure in the energy and environment realm. His participation in the EPA transition signals that the Trump team is looking to drastically reshape the climate policies the agency has pursued under the Obama administration. Ebell’s role is likely to infuriate environmentalists and Democrats but buoy critics of Obama’s climate rules.

    Ebell, who was dubbed an “elegant nerd” and a “policy wonk” by Vanity Fair, is known for his prolific writings that question what he calls climate change “alarmism.” He appears frequently in the media and before Congress. He’s also chairman of the Cooler Heads Coalition, a group of nonprofits that “question global warming alarmism and oppose energy-rationing policies.”

    Ebell appears to relish criticism from the left.

    In a biography submitted when he testified before Congress, he listed among his recognitions that he had been featured in a Greenpeace “Field Guide to Climate Criminals,” dubbed a “misleader” on global warming by Rolling Stone and was the subject of a motion to censure in the British House of Commons after Ebell criticized the United Kingdom’s chief scientific adviser for his views on global warming.

    More recently, Ebell has called the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan for greenhouse gases illegal and said that Obama joining the Paris climate treaty “is clearly an unconstitutional usurpation of the Senate’s authority.”
    "Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul Harvey

  • #2
    Fucking good.

    Let's get these people worrying about America's interests instead of classifying Joe Bob's fish pond as a fucking wetland nature preserve.

    Comment


    • #3
      The head of the Environmental Protection Agency is telling staff to quickly finish up the last round of regulations before President-elect Trump enters the Oval Office next year.
      "As I've mentioned to you before, we're running — not walking — through the finish line of Obama's presidency," EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy said in a staff memo obtained by the Washington Examiner after Trump was declared the winner of Tuesday's election.

      Comment


      • #4
        The EPA has done a LOT of good for the environment. I don't even question it, modern cars are so much more environmentally friendly. Same for more efficient houses, etc. But over the past decade, the policies - and worse, the tactics - have become too much.

        I'm not a climate change denier, but I don't believe every fucking apocalyptic Vox article about it either. Earth's atmosphere is incredibly complex. Year after year the models tell you one thing and real world results tell you something different than was predicted (sometimes "worse" and sometimes "better"). Sometimes a change in climate will decimate a species while others respond well to it - and that has been happening for billions of years.

        I'm not too keen on the world's leading climate skeptic being considered for running the EPA. I think there are less polarizing figures for the job that will quietly back off regulations while maintaining a realistic scientific perspective too.
        When the government pays, the government controls.

        Comment


        • #5
          I think it's good to get a dissenting voice in there. The EPA lives in an echo chamber, issolated from the real world. They contrive standards and regulations to justify their own existence at this point.

          Instead of haggling over minute diesel particulate emissions and minor mpg improvements here, they should focus on helping developing nations develop cleaner cars and energy similar to what developed nations have. Our cars are so clean there is almost no point in making them cleaner if their end goal is a cleaner environment as a whole.

          The time, energy, and money is better spent elsewhere.
          1971 Ford Torino - Time to go bigger and better.

          2011 F150 Limited - Stock with a 6.2

          Comment

          Working...
          X