Originally posted by s1lv3r
View Post
The statistics with regards to drunk driving prove this statement wrong. In the mid 1970s 60% of all traffic fatalities were alcohol related. Over 2/3 (75%) of accidents involving drivers age 16-20 were alcohol related.
In 1984 Ronand Reagan signed into law the MDAA. Drunk driving accidents dropped by 50% with the greatest drop being the 16-20 age group (down to 37% in 2013 as opposed to the prior 75% of accidents being alcohol related).
As is said I am not playing devils advocate for one side or the other as there are points that can be made either way. But to deny the causation with regards to the drinking age, bad decisions and drunken driving accidents (which was the impetus behind the MDAA) can not be supported by fact.
Comment