Random POLITICAL picture of the day !

[sc281]

Virtue signal fail

[sc281]

Hahahahaha

[sc281]

[sc281]

[sc281]

[sc281]

[sc281]

[sc281]

Rome, Italy

[SBFORDTECH]

Hahahahaha

I hope that's true.

[Strychnine]

That is their problem that they created when they made that choice to spread their legs. Or, maybe it was doggy style. Who really knows.

Not that I'm telling you what to do or anything, but what you just did was a mistake. By arguing against someone's statement you legitimize it. You're saying there's some part of that statement true enough to warrant a discussion.
What you should have said was, "The male soldier died - he's the primary victim (he's fucking dead). The female left at home is, at best, a secondary victim (she's sad, but still alive)"
Force someone to make intellectually honest arguments before you debate them. If something is categorically false, make that clear and then don't engage it.


*Insert cliche Sun Tzu "know your enemy" pic here*

[Torinoman]

Not that I'm telling you what to do or anything, but what you just did was a mistake. By arguing against someone's statement you legitimize it. You're saying there's some part of that statement true enough to warrant a discussion.
What you should have said was, "The male soldier died - he's the primary victim (he's fucking dead). The female left at home is, at best, a secondary victim (she's sad, but still alive)"
Force someone to make intellectually honest arguments before you debate them. If something is categorically false, make that clear and then don't engage it.


Know your enemy.

Are you telling us Line em Up missed the point again?
Noooo way....

[sc281]

[line-em-up]

Not that I'm telling you what to do or anything, but what you just did was a mistake. By arguing against someone's statement you legitimize it. You're saying there's some part of that statement true enough to warrant a discussion.
What you should have said was, "The male soldier died - he's the primary victim (he's fucking dead). The female left at home is, at best, a secondary victim (she's sad, but still alive)"
Force someone to make intellectually honest arguments before you debate them. If something is categorically false, make that clear and then don't engage it.


*Insert cliche Sun Tzu "know your enemy" pic here*

Thank you for the intelligent input. Honestly, I'm not sure I can think that deeply. You are playing chess while I am playing checkers.

As for the debating topic, I guess it's like what they say about not arguing with an idiot. I considered it an idiotic statement to try to make the woman the victim when it was the soldier who gave their life, so I was trying to spin the blame back to the woman. It seems that all people know how to do nowadays is blame someone else for their problems or play the victim card when things go wrong.

[line-em-up]

Are you telling us Line em Up missed the point again?
Noooo way....

And the point was? again?

[line-em-up]

Now that's funny. I just got through commenting on how people blame others for their mistakes and then I see the next post, which is an example.