Originally posted by Chili
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Blow Up the Tax Code and Start Over
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by BradMBut, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.Originally posted by LeahIn other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.
-
Originally posted by bcoop View PostPossible, yes, but if I recall correctly my effective tax rate was in the same range when I was single, not making shit, and qualified for EITC.Last edited by slow99; 06-18-2015, 07:09 PM.Originally posted by davbrucasI want to like Slow99 since people I know say he's a good guy, but just about everything he posts is condescending and passive aggressive.
Most people I talk to have nothing but good things to say about you, but you sure come across as a condescending prick. Do you have an inferiority complex you've attempted to overcome through overachievement? Or were you fondled as a child?
You and slow99 should date. You both have passive aggressiveness down pat.
Comment
-
Well this thread made me curious so i checked ... 2014 was 12.4% bitches!
Last full year in San Francisco was 16.2% Federal and 6.5% state.Last edited by slow99; 06-18-2015, 08:41 PM.Originally posted by davbrucasI want to like Slow99 since people I know say he's a good guy, but just about everything he posts is condescending and passive aggressive.
Most people I talk to have nothing but good things to say about you, but you sure come across as a condescending prick. Do you have an inferiority complex you've attempted to overcome through overachievement? Or were you fondled as a child?
You and slow99 should date. You both have passive aggressiveness down pat.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 46Tbird View PostThen under Paul's proposal, it would be 14.5%.
It will piss off a lot of poor and middle class people when they realize what a huge drop in taxes that rich people and corporations will get. But you also have to remember that those are the very entities that create jobs. There would be more money to get people into the workforce and upwardly mobile, as opposed to shifting it over to the government black hole of corruption and waste.
I am 100% willing to give it a shot. It is not feasible - or fair - to have the tax system remain the convoluted money redistribution scheme it is today.
I have never had the government mail me a job in an envelope. I have also never been hired for a job by a bum living under a bridge. So I am starting to think maybe it is the liberals who are wrong.Originally posted by racrguyWhat's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?Originally posted by racrguyVoting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bcoop View PostBP - I'm curious as to how your effective tax rate is under 10% being DINKs. I've got a house, make retirement contributions, donations, and have children, and my effective tax rate is typically 12-15%.Originally posted by racrguyWhat's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?Originally posted by racrguyVoting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
Comment
-
The $2 trillion cut number = the total tax receipts over 10 years would be more than $2 trillion less than the current system.Originally posted by davbrucasI want to like Slow99 since people I know say he's a good guy, but just about everything he posts is condescending and passive aggressive.
Most people I talk to have nothing but good things to say about you, but you sure come across as a condescending prick. Do you have an inferiority complex you've attempted to overcome through overachievement? Or were you fondled as a child?
You and slow99 should date. You both have passive aggressiveness down pat.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bcoop View PostBP - I'm curious as to how your effective tax rate is under 10% being DINKs. I've got a house, make retirement contributions, donations, and have children, and my effective tax rate is typically 12-15%.
Comment
-
Originally posted by slow99 View PostThe $2 trillion cut number = the total tax receipts over 10 years would be more than $2 trillion less than the current system.Originally posted by racrguyWhat's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?Originally posted by racrguyVoting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
Comment
Comment