Let's plant a tree for him
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Baltimore
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by bluecollar View PostI'll disagree. It is quite relevant.
18 charges, with 2 in March of this year. This type of attitude and behavior clearly explains why he didn't just take his ticket and walk. It also explains the police's lack of compassion as he is a known criminal and repeat offender.
Should he have died for pissing in public? No. He probably should have been shot during one of the multiple other altercations in which he was involved. Did it give the police the right to fuck him up? No. Should they be held accountable? Absofuckinglutely.
Please understand that this in no way condones the actions of the police. But to say that his record is irrelevant seems a bit of a stretch. Malicious destruction of property, second degree assault, burglary, tons of possession charges. You cannot tell me that someone with those [recent] charges is going to cooperate, take a citation, and go on with life like you or I would. It speaks to his character. Plain and simple."Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul Harvey
Comment
-
Originally posted by Craizie View PostI don't. Fuck them.
Originally posted by racrguy View PostIf I lived in Baltimore I'd be carrying, laws be damned.
Originally posted by Rick Modena View PostHow about instead of putting the cops that severed a guys spine and killing him on payed leave/desk duty and getting to the bottom of which cops were responsible for his death and taking the appropriate action. This would help prevent this kind of situation from happening.
IIRC the guy was pissing in public, that is a ticket, but instead they go all MMA on him and the guy dies, yeah, lets forget about that little tidbit of information...WH
Comment
-
Originally posted by bluecollar View PostI'll disagree. It is quite relevant.
18 charges, with 2 in March of this year. This type of attitude and behavior clearly explains why he didn't just take his ticket and walk. It also explains the police's lack of compassion as he is a known criminal and repeat offender.
Should he have died for pissing in public? No. He probably should have been shot during one of the multiple other altercations in which he was involved. Did it give the police the right to fuck him up? No. Should they be held accountable? Absofuckinglutely.
Please understand that this in no way condones the actions of the police. But to say that his record is irrelevant seems a bit of a stretch. Malicious destruction of property, second degree assault, burglary, tons of possession charges. You cannot tell me that someone with those [recent] charges is going to cooperate, take a citation, and go on with life like you or I would. It speaks to his character. Plain and simple.
Comment
-
Originally posted by racrguy View PostAbsolutely no doubt he was a piece of shit. The reason it's irrelevant is because a person's past and current actions don't warrant a certain level of force. Running from the police when he wasn't reasonably suspected of a crime warrants the chase that ensued?Magnus, I am your father. You need to ask your mother about a man named Calvin Klein.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 71chevellejohn View PostMarch 20, 2015: Possession of a Controlled Dangerous Substance
March 13, 2015: Malicious destruction of property, second-degree assault
January 20, 2015: Fourth-degree burglary, trespassing
January 14, 2015: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance, possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to distribute
December 31, 2014: Possession of narcotics with intent to distribute
December 14, 2014: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance
August 31, 2014: Illegal gambling, trespassing
January 25, 2014: Possession of marijuana
September 28, 2013: Distribution of narcotics, unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance, second-degree assault, second-degree escape
April 13, 2012: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to distribute, unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance, violation of probation
July 16, 2008: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance, possession with intent to distribute
March 28, 2008: Unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance
March 14, 2008: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to manufacture and distribute
February 11, 2008: Unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance, possession of a controlled dangerous substance
August 29, 2007: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to distribute, violation of probation
August 28, 2007: Possession of marijuana
August 23, 2007: False statement to a peace officer, unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance
July 16, 2007: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to distribute, unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance (2 counts)Originally posted by racrguy View PostAbsolutely no doubt he was a piece of shit. The reason it's irrelevant is because a person's past and current actions don't warrant a certain level of force. Running from the police when he wasn't reasonably suspected of a crime warrants the chase that ensued?
Dude decided over and over to break the law, and run from the cops/fight back. He made a choice, and he got to face the consequences of that decision."If I asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." - Henry Ford
Comment
-
Why is this never discussed in the msm?In 2013, of America’s 6,261 black homicide victims, more than 6,000 of them — 97 percent — were killed by people other than police. About three percent of black homicide victims were killed by police. And of that three percent, nearly every one was armed and dangerous. To label that an epidemic of police racism is a libel.
In addition, more than 9 in 10 blacks murdered were murdered by another black person. Now that is an epidemic — an epidemic of black murderers. (In response, it is pointed out that about 83 percent of whites are murdered by whites. But there is no equivalency here. Blacks murder at eight times the rate of whites — 34.4 per 100,000 versus 4.5 per 100,000.)
Comment
-
Originally posted by svo855 View PostThe first part of Proverbs 28:1 comes to mind in this case.
Originally posted by Baron Von Crowder View PostQuit trolling. I know you hate police, but I hate stupid people that cant keep from breaking the law repeatedly. Did he deserve to die? Probably not. It goes back to the "play stupid games, win stupid prizes"
Dude decided over and over to break the law, and run from the cops/fight back. He made a choice, and he got to face the consequences of that decision.
Comment
-
Originally posted by racrguy View PostIt's a good thing we don't base our laws on mythology.Magnus, I am your father. You need to ask your mother about a man named Calvin Klein.
Comment
-
Originally posted by racrguy View PostIt's a good thing we don't base our laws on mythology.
All I'm saying is the police can't use a person's past as a justification for mistreatment. Did he deserve it? Probably. Was what he did this time commensurate with the level of force used? I don't think so. No news report I've found has said he did anything outside of run when he saw them, and the only thing they found on him was a switchblade.
Your hatred of cops is fogging your normally solid judgement. You are judge jury and executioner against the cops. Pretty hypocritical, dont you think?"If I asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." - Henry Ford
Comment
Comment