Obama to announce sick time is a "right"

[Gasser64]

Those horses are out, so we just give up? Roll over and take the D in the A? No sir. Reign them in is what i say. If everybody bitched, complained, moaned, cried, and voted accordingly, they wouldnt be out of the barn. They might have got out but theyd be forced right back in. So ill do my part. Give not one inch. Call their acts criminal and call for them to be thrown in prison. Like we all know they should. You give up on justice and you wont have any

[YALE]

Those horses are out, so we just give up? Roll over and take the D in the A? No sir. Reign them in is what i say. If everybody bitched, complained, moaned, cried, and voted accordingly, they wouldnt be out of the barn. They might have got out but theyd be forced right back in. So ill do my part. Give not one inch. Call their acts criminal and call for them to be thrown in prison. Like we all know they should. You give up on justice and you wont have any

I didn't say that, either. Your particular brand of deontology seems to be set in stone, so I'll let you have it.

[Forever_frost]

Yes, they are out of the barn but if no one brings it to the attention of those who are unaware that they are executing unconstitutional actions, they will continue to grant themselves power.

[Gasser64]

And we all know how well that goes for you and me

[FastFox]

Extra paid time off

Magnus, if you feel that way, move to France or maybe Etheopia. Get a job there and laugh at all the poor mis treated Americans. Remember, this is not communist China, and you can leave.

[CexMashean]

Magnus, if you feel that way, move to France or maybe Etheopia. Get a job there and laugh at all the poor mis treated Americans. Remember, this is not communist China, and you can leave.

You sound extremely ignorant about the topic. Please, don't reproduce.

[FastFox]

Extra days off

You sound extremely ignorant about the topic. Please, don't reproduce.

You are exactly what is wrong in America today, and I bet you HAVE reproduced a lot, if you know where they are. Like, "Who yo Daddy ?'

[CexMashean]

JFC, you're retarded.

[Gasser64]

I didn't say that, either. Your particular brand of deontology seems to be set in stone, so I'll let you have it.

In trying to understand your points better, I'd like to hear more about your particular brand of deontology. Mine seems to be rooted in duty, rules, and restraint. No exceptions. The second you start making exceptions because of <insert sob story here> then you lose it all. Its all going down the toilet.

[YALE]

In trying to understand your points better, I'd like to hear more about your particular brand of deontology. Mine seems to be rooted in duty, rules, and restraint. No exceptions. The second you start making exceptions because of <insert sob story here> then you lose it all. Its all going down the toilet.

I don't have one, with exceptions. I'm primarily a consequentialist.

[racrguy]

I don't have one, with exceptions. I'm primarily a consequentialist.

And you've just lost it all, you've made an exception.

[Sean88gt]

Isn't the Supreme Court the same court that said that slavery was legal along with the Jim Crow laws?

You're judging prior decisions based on your experience in light of today's world view instead of encapsulating those decisions at the time they were made, Justice 172.

Aren't they also the same court that in the 1820's ruled that they have the power to decide everything and that the judges have lifetime appointments with out congress passing a law saying those things?

Generally from 1801-1835. But it was also written out in the constitution as prescribed in the federal papers. I'd suggest reading both, you'll have to anyway when you go to Yale. The entire point of lifetime appointments was to bolster a third branch without the threat of executive punishments via replacements.

Isn't the Supreme Court the same court that upheld a 2 year federal prison conviction of a man for growing wheat on his land for his own consumption and that ruling has been the foundation for every Federal power grab since that time?

Should I continue?

You should provide context. Here is where your 172 LSAT score looks like a pile of horseshit sprinkled with the finest bullshit. You're presenting vague strawman arguments without putting them in proper context or without fully explaining any relevancy.

[racrguy]

Oh snap son!

[Baron Von Crowder]

LawBOOSH

[svauto-erotic855]

You're judging prior decisions based on your experience in light of today's world view instead of encapsulating those decisions at the time they were made, Justice 172.


Generally from 1801-1835. But it was also written out in the constitution as prescribed in the federal papers. I'd suggest reading both, you'll have to anyway when you go to Yale. The entire point of lifetime appointments was to bolster a third branch without the threat of executive punishments via replacements.


You should provide context. Here is where your 172 LSAT score looks like a pile of horseshit sprinkled with the finest bullshit. You're presenting vague strawman arguments without putting them in proper context or without fully explaining any relevancy.

Being in line with their times doesn't make them a just decision but I do understand them. I also understand the reasons for why they ruled the way that they did but that is a topic for another thread.

I have read the Federalist Papers & Constitution and have a good laymen's understanding of the intentions of the framers. My comments were made just to needle people who believe that the courts are infallible.

FYI; I turned down a full ride and withdrew from a prominent school in the north east after half a semester in my late teens after experiencing first hand the despicable nature of many of the people in that part of the country. You could not pay me to go to Yale or any other school in that part of the country thus my decision to enroll in a TX university. I will get back with ya'll about my level of success in a few years.

PS Why does me getting a middle of the road A on a test get your panties into such a tightwad?