Does Ted Cruz not understand Net Neutrality?

[boost addict]

This is a good debate. You IT guys that are a lot smarter than me can argue the fine details of this that would actually be beneficial.

However, you have to admit this is highly suspicious. Why? Why in the last two years of this ideologue's presidency would he push this? He is a slave to his ideology so why push a program as controversial as this? He acts only in those things that serve a political purpose and his ideology. Look at his record...Dodd Frank, obamacare, disarming our arsenals, etc. If it doesn't serve his leftist ideology he doesn't do it. Look at Keystone....no reason not to do it except it conflicts with his left wing ideology and environmental wackos.

We are being shown some of the nuts and bolts in this push for nn. But I promise you there is a bigger machine Obama is really working on. Somewhere in this his ideology is benefitting....not us. The only proof of this I need is all the lies and deception this administration has practiced in over the last 6 years.

My base argument....if this is something we need, Obama is not the guy to push for it. It's a Trojan horse for something else. No doubt.

[boost addict]

Every time Obama pushes for something we should just slow down and remember...

"If you like your Dr. you can keep your Dr."

"If you like your health insurance you can keep your health insurance"

He has zero issue lying about any and everything. And I'm tellin ya he's lying about this one too.

[Broncojohnny]

Every time Obama pushes for something we should just slow down and remember...

"If you like your Dr. you can keep your Dr."

"If you like your health insurance you can keep your health insurance"

He has zero issue lying about any and everything. And I'm tellin ya he's lying about this one too.

Not only this but if these ISP's can do this for financial gain then why aren't they? Why do I have a FIOS connection right now that is neutral if there is so much money to be made by throttling my connection based on content? It all seems like a bunch of bullshit scaremongering. Where is all this abuse at and if it hasn't happened yet (for whatever reason) then why not wait until there is an actual problem to start dolling out new regulatory standards or whatever the fuck these guys want to pass?

Going back to what Boost Addict said, I am just not buying it. Fool me once and all that....

[matts5.0]

A lot of smart people aren't buying it, a lot of smart people are, I think the difference in the two groups is their level of trust in government.

[boost addict]

And oh yea...

"Obamacare isn't a tax"

Then to the Supreme Court...

"Obamacare is a tax"

There's no way we know the truth of what Obama is really pushing.

[CexMashean]

Has everyone forgot about this already, or do they just not understand it?

[Broncojohnny]

I fully understand the Netflix situation. One incident doesn't mean we need government regulation where we didn't have it in the past.

[CexMashean]

But you guys work off of "what ifs". Here's a "it did happen, and here's theit power", but yet this some how isn't enough? This is them, in the practice of doing what net neutrality is trying to prevent. But lets just ignore it?

fucking lollercoaster on you guys.

[YALE]

I fully understand the Netflix situation. One incident doesn't mean we need government regulation where we didn't have it in the past.

We already have the regulation in question. Interference in this market, at this level, requires no new regulations. Why is that hard to understand? You're a smart guy.

[matts5.0]

We already have the regulation in question. Interference in this market, at this level, requires no new regulations. Why is that hard to understand? You're a smart guy.

So if no new regulation is required, whats the issue? We should be good right?

[YALE]

So if no new regulation is required, whats the issue? We should be good right?

Does every problem require a new law to be solved?

[matts5.0]

Does every problem require a new law to be solved?

No. No new laws is the way to go!

[YALE]

No. No new laws is the way to go!

Then if there's a problem, and government can just do their fucking job, and fix it, and not require new laws, and not be granted new powers, again, why be against it?

[matts5.0]

Then if there's a problem, and government can just do their fucking job, and fix it, and not require new laws, and not be granted new powers, again, why be against it?

Bro, it's pretty obvious the only part of it im against is the government part.

[CexMashean]

Bro, it's pretty obvious the only part of it im against is the government part.

But you're all for the corporation part continuing to fuck us? Cool.