250,000 Muslims being brought to US Soil? Is this true?

[Gasser64]

grasping the meaning of the phrase "mutually exclusive" has nothing to do with religion. at. all.

Well they're not sooo...iI really don't know what else to say. Not all of them anyway, which, again, is the broad generalization that he made. It's just not true.

And here ya go racr, I'll help ya. You just need to be educated, little guy. Maybe you're just misunderstood.

http://i.word.com/idictionary/mutually%20exclusive

[racrguy]

Well they're not sooo...iI really don't know what else to say. Not all of them anyway, which, again, is the broad generalization that he made. It's just not true.

And here ya go racr, I'll help ya. You just need to be educated, little guy. Maybe you're just misunderstood.

http://i.word.com/idictionary/mutually%20exclusive

[Nash B.]

All? No sir, not even a little bit

Then what differentiates Catholicism, Baptism, Methodism, and Lutheranism from each other?

[The King]

Doctrine

[71chevellejohn]

So, are they here yet? I'd hate for them to miss out on the ebolas.

[Maddhattter]

Then what differentiates Catholicism, Baptism, Methodism, and Lutheranism from each other?

These aren't different religions. They're different sects of the same religion.

Though, you are correct, in that if any of the above are correct, the others must necessarily be incorrect. Making them mutually exclusive.

[The King]

Incorrect.

The above listed four can all be correct. They simply use differing doctrines to reach the same end result.

[Maddhattter]

Incorrect.

The above listed four can all be correct. They simply use differing doctrines to reach the same end result.

If they disagree on doctrine, then they cannot all be correct. Thus, keeping them mutually exclusive.

[The King]

Incorrect

Doctrine = system of teaching

Differing systems of teaching that reach the same conclusion are all inclusive, rather than exclusive.

[Maddhattter]

Incorrect

Doctrine = system of teaching

Still trying to redefine words, I see....

Differing systems of teaching that reach the same conclusion are all inclusive, rather than exclusive.

The devil, as they say, is in the details. Unless they agree on everything, which they don't, then they are mutually exclusive. In the end, not all of them can be true.

[The King]

Still trying to redefine words, I see....



The devil, as they say, is in the details. Unless they agree on everything, which they don't, then they are mutually exclusive. In the end, not all of them can be true.

Incorrect, defined by Google search...something you and others would identify with.

In the end, all of them can arrive at the Truth, which in the case of Christianity is Biblical Truth.

[Maddhattter]

Incorrect, defined by Google search...something you and others would identify with.

Nope. Even google disagrees with you... Google defines it as "a belief or set of beliefs held and taught by a church, political party, or other group". Same as the link I posted above.

In the end, all of them can arrive at the Truth, which in the case of Christianity is Biblical Truth.

And now we're just making more unsupported assertions. That didn't take long.

[The King]

That is but one of the definitions offered up by a Google search. The fact that you chose a particular one to reference in no way diminishes the validity of other recognized definitions. Sorry, you're just not that qualified to do so.

Whether you agree with my assertion also in no way diminishes the validity of same. Again, sorry but you're just not that qualified to do so.

[Maddhattter]

That is but one of the definitions offered up by a Google search. The fact that you chose a particular one to reference in no way diminishes the validity of other recognized definitions. Sorry, you're just not that qualified to do so.

Nothing I did diminishes the validity of other definitions. I used one from an actual authoritative source.

Whether you agree with my assertion also in no way diminishes the validity of same. Again, sorry but you're just not that qualified to do so.

I agree. The fact that your claim has no validity has nothing to do with me and my qualifications and more to do with the fact that something is not valid until it's been demonstrated, which you've not done.

[The King]

As did I, and you, yourself, have demonstrated nothing other than to support my claim.