First scientific proof of God found

[Maddhattter]

Admitting that I was unaware that the site was satire is back pedaling?

How so?

[Baron Von Crowder]

I didn't try to disprove anything. Something must first be proven to be disproved. So, please, keep parading your ignorance. It only get's funnier.

[Wish4svts]

So madhatter didn't know the school was fake... Shouldnt we be focused on who posted this retarded article in the first place?

[SamTex]

Damn, look at all the madhaters.

[CexMashean]

So madhatter didn't know the school was fake... Shouldnt we be focused on who posted this retarded article in the first place?

No, because instead of saying the article was fake, he was so excited to get to argue and "prove" someone wrong.

AKA, the typical attitude of an atheist to prove they're right, when he argued that wasn't the typical attitude of an atheist to argue of how they're right . . . . .

[Maddhattter]

he was so excited to get to argue and "prove" someone wrong.

I made no attempt at proving anyone wrong. I simply stated that they've done nothing to demonstrate they were correct.

I even stated that if they got their research though the peer-review process, that's when there would be something to talk about. That requires the assumption that they could have been correct.

When I posted my original response, I was unaware that WIT was a hoax/satire site. In fact, when it was pointed out that WIT was one, I stated that I didn't look into WIT at all and why I didn't.

I admit that I was ignorant of WIT's nature. At least I take the time to learn when other people demonstrate my ignorance.

[SamTex]

No, because instead of saying the article was fake, he was so excited to get to argue and "prove" someone wrong.

AKA, the typical attitude of an atheist to prove they're right, when he argued that wasn't the typical attitude of an atheist to argue of how they're right . . . . .

You're not even the one who called him out on it.

Throw stones much?

[CexMashean]

Throw stones much?

Yes.

[jluv]

The story is rather hilarious. Decoding DNA to translate into bible verses? LMAO!!!

[exlude]

No, because instead of saying the article was fake, he was so excited to get to argue and "prove" someone wrong.

AKA, the typical attitude of an atheist to prove they're right, when he argued that wasn't the typical attitude of an atheist to argue of how they're right . . . . .

Typical atheist? You're setting yourself up for failure there alone. Why do you have an issue with intellectual debate even over a bogus article being posted? Could be telling....