Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pennsylvania AG Shuts Down Political Corruption Probe After Catching Only Black Democ

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pennsylvania AG Shuts Down Political Corruption Probe After Catching Only Black Democ



    Pennsylvania AG Shuts Down Political Corruption Probe After Catching Only Black Democrats

    Appalachian Area News Network, 3/17/14

    The attorney general of Pennsylvania shut down an investigation of corrupt elected officials because everyone they caught – on tape – taking cash and gifts … was a black Democrat.

    According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, the sting operation began with a deal: A black lobbyist (who had been accused of fraud and participated in the sting to gain favorable treatment from the authorities) offered elected officials – black and white, Democrat and Republican – cash and gifts in exchange for votes.

    Over a three-year period, the lobbyist found a handful of politicians willing to take the deal.

    “Sources with knowledge of the sting said the investigation made financial pitches to both Republicans and Democrats, but only Democrats accepted the payments,” said the Inquirer.

    Furthermore, all the offending Democrats were black, members of the Philadelphia delegation to the state legislature.

    “Four state lawmakers took money,” the newspaper reported. “State Rep. Ronald G. Waters accepted multiple payments totaling $7,650; State Rep. Vanessa Brown took $4,000; State Rep. Michelle Brownlee received $3,500; and State Rep. Louise Bishop took $1,500, said people with knowledge of the investigation.”

    So far, none of the politicians have been charged with wrongdoing.

    Discover the detailed account of rampant racial crime in America and how it’s covered up in Colin Flaherty’s “White Girl Bleed A Lot: The Return of Racial Violence to America and How the Media Ignore It.”

    State Attorney General Kathleen Kane told the Inquirer she stopped the investigation because it was “poorly conceived, badly managed and tainted by racism.” She even argued that the sting had specifically targeted African-Americans.

    Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams, however, himself a black Democrat, refuted the accusation.

    “The notion that they would target anyone based on race is ridiculous,” Williams said in a statement. “I am confident they are not racist, and it is regrettable that the attorney general would casually throw around such an explosive accusation.”

    In one exchange, the lobbyist – wired for sound – went to State. Rep. Vanessa Brown’s office and “handed her an envelope with $2,000, according to people who have reviewed a transcript of a tape [the lobbyist] made on that day. As Brown accepted the money, they said, she put it in her purse and said: ‘Yo, good looking and Ooowee. … Thank you twice.” After he gave Brown the money, (the lobbyist) urged her to vote against a bill that would require voters to show identification at the polls, the sources said.”

    Black leaders claim voter ID laws are thinly veiled Republican attempts to suppress black voters because many black people, who vote Democrat in overwhelming numbers, don’t have valid, government-issued IDs.

    In another recorded meeting in April 2011, to mark State Rep. Waters’ 61st birthday, the lobbyist gave him $1,000, and the transaction was recorded on tape, according to people who read a transcript of the conversation.

    As the lobbyist handed Waters an envelope, the sources said, Ali told him: “Hey, there’s $1,000 in there, bro.”

    Waters replied: “My man, happy birthday to Ron Waters.”

    All involved denied accepting illegal cash and gifts or said they could not remember.

    The Inquirer revealed the investigation had gathered 400 hours of audio and video recordings of the lobbyist meeting with public officials. But soon after Kane’s inauguration in 2013 as the first female and Democrat attorney general in the state’s history, she began shutting the investigation down.

    Then people connected to the investigation who saw the transcripts and read the recordings started talking to the Inquirer. Many of these people left the attorney general’s office soon after Kane took office.

    Kane told the Inquirer the allegations are a political and sexist and racist attack from her Republican enemies: “Nothing more than the Good Ol’ Boys club playing political games to discredit me in order to fulfill their own selfish and improper agenda.”

    The story is rocketing through Philadelphia business and political circles. Some say the results of the investigation are just “business as usual.” Other criticize the past three attorney generals for working with the lobbyist, who was under investigation for $430,000 in fraud as well as other cases of violations of election law.

    Said one friend of Kane to the Inquirer: “Is this a John Grisham novel?”

  • #2
    Sig check.
    ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

    Comment


    • #3
      I am astonished. How could this possibly be true?
      When the government pays, the government controls.

      Comment


      • #4
        Cash in an envelope

        Whoop, der it izzz. Here come da Judge....What you talkin bout Willis ?

        Comment


        • #5
          That's racist!
          Originally posted by BradM
          But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
          Originally posted by Leah
          In other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.

          Comment


          • #6
            When the lawmakers and law enforcers are themselves lawless, why should anyone else obey it?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by sc281 View Post
              When the lawmakers and law enforcers are themselves lawless, why should anyone else obey it?
              That is the attitude that I have heard several people express lately, including myself. These instances of the highest officials ignoring or breaking our laws are going to do a lot to damage the fabric of our country. I feel that is actually what they want. It goes along the lines of them destroying the US from within.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by sc281 View Post
                When the lawmakers and law enforcers are themselves lawless, why should anyone else obey it?
                Because they can prosecute you, and you can't prosecute them?
                sigpic

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Magnus View Post
                  Because they can prosecute you, and you can't prosecute them?
                  You can't sue them?
                  ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    sure, sue, whatever.
                    You know what the fuck I meant.
                    They can do more to you than you can to them, and they get to call it "legal" when they do it.
                    sigpic

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by YALE View Post
                      You can't sue them?
                      They should be persecuted.
                      "If I asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." - Henry Ford

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Magnus View Post
                        Because they can prosecute you, and you can't prosecute them?

                        That's right. For now. Only because people respect and fear, the law.

                        We as a society are trained to obey what is perceived as "the law" and "authority", but mainly because of societal pressures. We live in a society with very little security when you think about it. The moral influences and family/societal pressures to do right/be good/etc are what allows a very small (5 million or less) lawkeeping force to control 300 million people.

                        As corruption, graft, and amoral behavior become more and more mainstream, how long will it take for the zeitgeist to shift from "be a good citizen and contribute" to "my ends are what matters, my means are irrelevant"? Especially when the people doing the lawmaking and enforcing are spearheading this way of thinking? And how long can the police keep law and order when this happens, being outnumbered 60 to 1?

                        Edit:

                        There are less than a million law enforcement officers in the U.S. So more like being outnumbered 300 to 1.
                        http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_p..._United_States
                        Last edited by sc281; 03-20-2014, 01:01 PM. Reason: rewording

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X