Tweet
And by classy, I mean soulless. The biggest piece of shit in the unflushed toilet bowl that is the Congress.
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/schum...uld-not_122013
Schumer: Veterans Should Take a Pay Cut But Congress Should Not
Kimberly Paxton
December 16th, 2013
Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) believes that it’s time that US military veterans do their part for America by taking a cut to their retirement benefits.
Because, of course, veterans haven’t done enough for the country.
Members of Congress, however, should take no such cuts. According to the rather despicable gun-control advocating Senator Schumer, the government officials have sacrificed enough.
Civilian federal employees have been cut, cut, cut. I think there was a feeling, if you’re going to cut them further, which was done, that the military retirees should have about an equal amount. It’s small,” the New York Democrat told MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.
“I think (Rep.) Paul Ryan and (Sen.) Patty Murray looked everywhere they could to try and find compromise. Everybody had to take a little,” Schumer said.
“They’re going to have to pay a tiny, little bit into it, which they never have,” he added.
But Schumer maintained members of Congress should not be forced to take a pay cut. He said they have already sacrificed, since they have not seen a pay raise “in a long time,” and explained most of them are paying more for healthcare insurance.
“We have taken pretty big cuts,” he said. (source)
Let’s tally up the numbers to put things in perspective:
The average pension for a retired veteran was $9,669 in 2011. (source)
The salary for a US Senator is $174,000. (source)
Just so this statistic is perfectly clear, the members of Congress bring in over 17 times the amount that retired vets do.
Despite this, veterans under the age of 62 will be looking at a 1% per year cut in their benefits. Members of Congress will not be looking at any reduction.
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/schum...uld-not_122013
Schumer: Veterans Should Take a Pay Cut But Congress Should Not
Kimberly Paxton
December 16th, 2013
Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) believes that it’s time that US military veterans do their part for America by taking a cut to their retirement benefits.
Because, of course, veterans haven’t done enough for the country.
Members of Congress, however, should take no such cuts. According to the rather despicable gun-control advocating Senator Schumer, the government officials have sacrificed enough.
Civilian federal employees have been cut, cut, cut. I think there was a feeling, if you’re going to cut them further, which was done, that the military retirees should have about an equal amount. It’s small,” the New York Democrat told MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.
“I think (Rep.) Paul Ryan and (Sen.) Patty Murray looked everywhere they could to try and find compromise. Everybody had to take a little,” Schumer said.
“They’re going to have to pay a tiny, little bit into it, which they never have,” he added.
But Schumer maintained members of Congress should not be forced to take a pay cut. He said they have already sacrificed, since they have not seen a pay raise “in a long time,” and explained most of them are paying more for healthcare insurance.
“We have taken pretty big cuts,” he said. (source)
Let’s tally up the numbers to put things in perspective:
The average pension for a retired veteran was $9,669 in 2011. (source)
The salary for a US Senator is $174,000. (source)
Just so this statistic is perfectly clear, the members of Congress bring in over 17 times the amount that retired vets do.
Despite this, veterans under the age of 62 will be looking at a 1% per year cut in their benefits. Members of Congress will not be looking at any reduction.
Comment