So he didn't kill those cops? He just went on the run because his old bosses were crooked?
I'm just saying I don't take the word of any official as the gospel. The public gets lied to all the time, I don't put it past any agency to fabricate a story to cover their own ass.
Stevo
Originally posted by SSMAN
...Welcome to the land of "Fuck it". No body cares, and if they do, no body cares.
So he is just a misunderstood martyr and his family is lying about him being a murderous prick?
I guess I need to type small words in big letters for you understand.... I said I don't immediately believe everything that ANY agency says. I didn't say jack shit about him being innocent. There are hundreds of videos of cops straight up lying to cover their own asses.
Stevo
Originally posted by SSMAN
...Welcome to the land of "Fuck it". No body cares, and if they do, no body cares.
I'm just saying I don't take the word of any official as the gospel. The public gets lied to all the time, I don't put it past any agency to fabricate a story to cover their own ass.
A better example here would be Waco or Ruby Ridge. Dorner kind of started his ordeal.
The higher ups in the LAPD had no problem running Rampart in the 1980s. That is where some LAPD officers were actually bank robbers. And bodyguards for gangster rappers. And engaging in gang activity. And selling drugs. There were even accusations that they pulled off gang hits.
All of these guys were doing this shit and how did the scandal break? One guy told on them. Out of all the cops, only one guy came out.
Fast forward to today and I don't think they would have any problem threatening the life of someone inside the LAPD who knew about things they were doing if they are still doing them. For all you and I know, they threatened Dormer with his life and he went fucking crazy and killed as many of them as he could.
The bottom line here is credibility. The LAPD has none. If the same thing happened to the Frisco PD, i would believe what they had to say. The LAPD has zero credibility.
Originally posted by racrguy
What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
Originally posted by racrguy
Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
The higher ups in the LAPD had no problem running Rampart in the 1980s. That is where some LAPD officers were actually bank robbers. And bodyguards for gangster rappers. And engaging in gang activity. And selling drugs. There were even accusations that they pulled off gang hits.
All of these guys were doing this shit and how did the scandal break? One guy told on them. Out of all the cops, only one guy came out.
Fast forward to today and I don't think they would have any problem threatening the life of someone inside the LAPD who knew about things they were doing if they are still doing them. For all you and I know, they threatened Dormer with his life and he went fucking crazy and killed as many of them as he could.
The bottom line here is credibility. The LAPD has none. If the same thing happened to the Frisco PD, i would believe what they had to say. The LAPD has zero credibility.
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin "A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser Tytler
I'm just saying I don't take the word of any official as the gospel. The public gets lied to all the time, I don't put it past any agency to fabricate a story to cover their own ass.
Shut the fuck up and realize you were too busy trying to belittle someone to actually read what you quoted, or continue trying to play it off and look like an idiot.
Your choice.
Stevo
Originally posted by SSMAN
...Welcome to the land of "Fuck it". No body cares, and if they do, no body cares.
Comment