Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pentagon training manual: white males have unfair advantages

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pentagon training manual: white males have unfair advantages

    A controversial 600-plus page manual used by the military to train its Equal Opportunity officers teaches that "healthy, white, heterosexual, Christian" men hold an unfair advantage over other races, and warns in great detail about a so-called "White Male Club."

    “Simply put, a healthy, white, heterosexual, Christian male receives many unearned advantages of social privilege, whereas a black, homosexual, atheist female in poor health receives many unearned disadvantages of social privilege,” reads a statement in the manual created by the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute (DEOMI).

    The manual, which was obtained by Fox News, also instructs troops to “support the leadership of people of color. Do this consistently, but not uncritically,” the manual states.



    The military manual goes into great detail about a so-called “White Male Club.”


    The Equal Opportunity Advisor Student Guide is the textbook used during a three month DEOMI course taught at Patrick Air Force Base in Florida. Individuals who attend the training lead Equal Opportunity briefings on military installations around the nation.

    The 637-page manual covers a wide range of issues from racism and religious diversity to cultural awareness, extremism and white privilege.

    I obtained a copy of the manual from an Equal Opportunity officer who was disturbed by the course content and furious over the DEOMI’s reliance on the Southern Poverty Law Center for information on “extremist” groups.

    “I’m participating in teaching things that are not true,” the instructor told me. He asked not to be identified because he feared reprisals.

    “I should not be in a position to do that,” he said. “It violates Constitutional principles, but it also violates my conscience. And I’m not going to do it – not going to do it.”

    Read an excerpt from the manual here.

    DEOMI instructors were also responsible for briefings at bases around the country that falsely labeled evangelical Christians, Catholics and a number of high-profile Christian ministries as domestic hate groups.

    I contacted the Pentagon as well as the DEOMI multiple times for comment on this story, but so far they have not responded to my requests.

    DEOMI opened in 1971 in response to the civil rights movement. It’s responsible for Equal Opportunity/Equal Employment Opportunity education and training for military active duty and reservists, according to its website.

    The subject of white privilege emerged in a 20-page section titled, “Power and Privilege.”

    “Whites are the empowered group,” the manual declares. “White males represent the haves as compared to the have-nots.”

    The military document advises personnel to “assume racism is everywhere, every day” and “notice code words for race.” They are also instructed to “understand and learn from the history of whiteness and racism.”

    “Assume racism is everywhere, everyday,” read a statement in a section titled, ‘How to be a strong 'white ally.'"

    “One of the privileges of being white is not having to see or deal with racism all the time,” the manual states. “We have to learn to see the effect that racism has.”

    On page 181 of the manual, the military points out that status and wealth are typically passed from generation to generation and “represent classic examples of the unearned advantages of social privilege.”

    “As such, the unfair economic advantages and disadvantages created long ago by institutions for whites, males, Christians, etc. still affect socioeconomic privilege today,” the manual states.

    The guide also points out that whites are over-represented and blacks are underrepresented in positive news stories, that middle class blacks live in poorer neighborhoods than middle class whites and that even though there are more white criminals than any other race, the news coverage of black criminals is about equal to the news coverage of white criminals.

    The military manual goes into great detail about a so-called “White Male Club.”

    “In spite of slave insurrections, civil war, the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments, the women’s suffrage movement leading to the 19th amendment, the civil rights movement, urban rebellions and the contemporary feminist movement, the club persists,” the document states.

    DEOMI states that “full access to the resources of the club still escape the vision of equitable distribution.”

    The military also implies that white Americans may be in denial about racism.

    In a section titled, “Rationalizations for Retaining Privilege and Avoiding Responsibilities,” the military lays out excuses white people use.

    “Today some white people may use the tactic of denial when they say, ‘It’s a level playing field; this is a land of equal opportunity,’” the manual reads. “Some white people may be counterattacking today by saying political correctness rules the universities or they want special status.”

    DEOMI points out that if “white people are unable to maintain that the atrocities are all in the past, they may switch to tactics to make a current situation seem isolated.”

    They said some of the ways whites may claim to be victims include saying things like, “I have it just as bad as anyone else,” “They’re taking away our jobs,” or “White people are under attack.”
    The military concludes the section by urging students to “understand and learn from the history of whiteness and racism” and “support the leadership of people of color.”

    I called former Congressman and Lt. Col. Allen West (ret.) to get his take on the manual. In a nutshell – he wants a congressional investigation.

    “This is the Obama administration’s outreach of social justice into the United States military,” he told me. “Equal Opportunity in the Army that I grew up in did not have anything to do with white privilege.”

    West said he is very concerned about the training guide.

    “When the president talked about fundamentally transforming the United States of America, I believe he also had a dedicated agenda of going after the United States military,” he said. “The priorities of this administration are totally whacked.”

    West said the DEOMI manual reminded him of a similar program inflicted on the military by President Clinton.

    “They came down with a new training requirement called, ‘Consideration of Others Training,’” he said. “The soldiers were supposed to sit around and go through vignettes and talk about their feelings.”

    I truly wish the Pentagon and the DEOMI would return my telephone calls. I’d like to know how teaching soldiers, airmen and sailors about white privilege and fomenting racial division helps them protect our nation from the enemy.

  • #2
    "On page 181 of the manual, the military points out that status and wealth are typically passed from generation to generation "

    Ya know what? Growing up, I ignored the negative things said about others and I defended those people because I believed everyone was equal. As I learned lessons in life, I began to form my own opinions and began to understand that some people get advantages based on their race and it changed my mind for the worse. I realized that we aren't all treated the same. Because of my race, I don't get the same advantages as others because I don't fall into the affirmative action group and I (and my friends and family) have been denied help when we needed it because I "didn't qualify", while others seem to get whatever they ask for. So, my perceptions have been built from life experiences. Not "passed on" from my elders. I still believe that we are all equal, but we are not treated equally by our govt. What we do with our lives should mostly depend on how much work we put into it. Our govt is making the situation worse day by day by stealing from the workers and rewarding the lazy people. Yet, they will never be happy until the white, christian male is extinct or become slaves to the rest of them. I am not willing to let that happen.

    Now, to all of the lunes that would believe what this fucked up govt is feeding you,

    Now, I am to believe that because I am a white, male, christian that doesn't enjoy gettin pounded in the ass that I am somehow a nutjob, racist, terrorist living the easy life. That is a perfect example of how the libs are masters at spin. It is so laughable that I don't even know how to respond to it. Say what you will. Whatever. I don't care.

    I have worked hard all of my like to create a decent life for my family and me. I worked hard in school to get an education and I have worked hard to get ahead. I am not wealthy, nor do I live a lavish lifestyle. I also don't sit on the couch, collecting a paycheck. I don't go out partying with my friends, blowing money, living the highlife; only to collect food stamps because I have no money left. I drive a 400,000 mile, worn out car because I don't feel the need to have the latest and greatest. Honestly, with the way things are now, I can no longer afford one. But, I do have my integrity and pride. I am willing to earn my way through life instead of taking whatever handout and freebees people/govt will give me. I try my best to live within my means. I am the opposite of what Obummer and his obummermites want. What will I do about it? It seems there isn't much I can do. But, when the govt starts taking, taking and taking, only to give to the takers, things will eventually get too tight for me to make it anymore. I refuse to live as a slave to my govt. Call me what you want, but you will only push me so far before I come unglued. When that happens, there won't be a law or label that will keep you and your goverment safe from my wrath.

    To all of my fellow Americans. Alone, we are just one powerless human. Together, we can rule the world. Where and when are you going to stand up and fight for your country?

    Signed,
    Joe Q. American and millions of US citizens like me
    Last edited by line-em-up; 10-31-2013, 06:11 PM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Note the references to Clinton and the current sack of monkey shit POTUS...neither served in the military yet they presumed/presume to know what's best for those who do.

      Comment


      • #4
        I stopped reading at white privilege.

        Comment


        • #5
          Maybe it's time to get the klan back togeather and let them see a true white power
          "Yeeeeehhhhhaaaaawwwww that's my jam"

          Comment


          • #6
            As a white male, I don't think I have ever benefitted from some "unknown advantage" nor have I seen any benefit from my veteran status (other than a VA loan on my home).

            I would like to have received that unspecified white male benefit though!

            Comment


            • #7
              White power!!!

              Comment


              • #8
                As a white male, Christian I know I haven't benefited from any advantage. Hell, in the Army if a black claims racism, you're fucked. No if's, and's or but's.
                I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

                Comment


                • #9
                  They are using our military and tax dollars to further brainwash the soldiers into hating the white man. So, if they decide to sic the military on us, they will have no issues gunning us down the moment they see our skin color.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    wow!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by line-em-up View Post
                      They are using our military and tax dollars to further brainwash the soldiers into hating the white man. So, if they decide to sic the military on us, they will have no issues gunning us down the moment they see our skin color.
                      The liberals have already infiltrated the military. Look at some of the proposed policy changes recently. Taking God out of the Oath and making it "optional" , the Unisex hats, etc..

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Fuck, it is great to be WHITE!
                        Fuck you. We're going to Costco.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          White males are the only ones without advantages

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I was searching for an article regarding the muslum butherhood military advisor that Obummer appointed. He has been responsible for many of the anti-American, anti-Christian decisions lately. Strangely, nothing comes up for me. I did find this article, though. It shows the crap that they are doing to change our military into their shit state.

                            Your source for the latest Christian news and religion news headlines from the United States and the world. Trending topics and news stories that are important to your Christian faith.



                            Chaplains Pursue Their Mission in a Military Suddenly Hostile to Christianity



                            WORLD News Service

                            Monday, July 15, 2013


                            (WNS) -- This year: An Idaho Air Force base removes a painting called “Blessed Are the Peacemakers” because it references a Bible verse. The Air Force yanks off YouTube a video tribute to first sergeants because its statement, “God created a first sergeant,” is “highly suggestive of the Book of Genesis in the Bible and has Christian overtones.”

                            Also this year: An Army Reserve training brief on hate groups declares that evangelical Christians and Roman Catholics are extremists as dangerous as al Qaeda. A commander tells a chaplain to “stay in your lane” when he offers spiritual advice about the military’s exploding sexual assault problem.

                            Last year: A superior tells an Air Force major to remove from his desk the Bible he had kept there for 23 years. An Army lieutenant colonel instructs his subordinates to recognize the “religious right in America” as a domestic hate group like the KKK and Neo-Nazis. An Army master sergeant with 25 years of service faces punishment for serving Chick-fil-A sandwiches at his promotion party.

                            Two years ago: Christian prayers banned at veteran funeral services in Houston’s National Cemetery. Bibles temporarily banned at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. A Christian cross banned from a military chapel in Afghanistan. A chaplain called into his supervisor’s office and chewed out for closing a prayer with the words “In Jesus’ name.”

                            Coincidence that all these incidents occurred recently? About 80 military chaplains who gathered in South Carolina for a three-day conference last month didn’t think so. George Washington established the military chaplaincy, but Doug Lee, a retired Army chaplain who achieved the rank of brigadier general, told attendees, “You are in the military in a new era.”

                            The marginalization of Christianity in a military becoming more and more hostile to religion has left the chaplains feeling muzzled — and they now face same-sex couples coming to them for marriage counseling. The chaplains still get to wear crosses on their collars, so they worry even more about those Christians in regular uniforms losing the First Amendment freedom of religious expression that they volunteered to defend.

                            “We are at war,” said Chaplain Thomas MacGregor, a U.S. Army colonel. In June 2009, MacGregor bucked the trend by invoking Jesus’ name and proclaiming His resurrection during a prayer at the official Normandy ceremony honoring the 65th anniversary of D-Day. Several chaplains turned down the assignment, MacGregor said: “Be as wise as a serpent and as harmless as a dove … that is the rule of the thumb I give to my junior chaplains.”

                            This May, frustrated with the weight of evidence, Coast Guard Rear Admiral William Lee broke rank, throwing out his prepared text at Washington’s National Day of Prayer event.

                            “They expect us to check our religion in at the door — don’t bring that here,” Lee said. “Leaders like myself are feeling the constraints of rules and regulations and guidance issued by lawyers that put us in a tighter and tighter box regarding our constitutional right to express our religious faith. … Pray that we will be able to weather the storm.” Lee received five standing ovations.

                            Capitol Hill lawmakers are taking notice. In June, Rep. John Fleming, R-La., successfully inserted into a Defense spending bill an amendment stating military personnel will have freedom of conscience and will not be disciplined for their religious beliefs. At the chaplains’ conference Doug Lee commented on that: “Isn’t it tragic that we have to have a special paragraph that would insist on your First Amendment rights which are clearly spelled out already? … That’s where we are.”

                            Last December Congress passed a similar amendment to safeguard the religious beliefs of service members. But President Barack Obama, when he signed the larger bill into law, said the protections were “unnecessary” and “ill-advised.” Six months later the Obama administration has refused to issue regulations to enforce the protections. At a congressional hearing this spring, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel seemed to be unaware that the protections were in the law.

                            The Obama administration issued a statement on June 11 saying it “strongly objects” to a new religious liberty amendment: It would have a “significant adverse effect on good order, discipline, morale and mission accomplishment.” The administration did not object to an amendment offered last month by Rep. Jared Polis, D-Colo., that would create atheist chaplains. That amendment lost, but 150 House Democrats voted for it.

                            How bad is the military environment? Reports of the influence of Mikey Weinstein, who met with officials at the Pentagon and has called religious proselytizing “a national security threat … sedition and treason … spiritual rape,” are probably exaggerated. But Major John Sackett, an Air Force chaplain, told me at the conference that Air Force chaplains like himself have “fear of retribution. … I often ask, ‘Will what I need to say now actually get me in trouble?’”

                            Complicating this are legitimate concerns that in the past some Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, or other members of the American military have felt the pressure that minorities often feel. But, as Michael Horowitz of the Hudson Institute has put it, evangelicals in many ways are the new Jews of American society, facing discrimination of the kind Jews felt two generations ago.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              cont..

                              John Wells, a former Navy commander turned lawyer who represents the master sergeant facing discipline for serving Chick-fil-A at his promotion party, said, “The problem is this case is the tip of the iceberg. I’ve got people calling me all the time saying, ‘I am a chaplain and my prayers are being censored,’ or ‘I am being told if I state my opinion on something that I am going to get hammered.’”

                              Sackett, the Air Force chaplain, traces this climate of intimidation to confusion about the law: “You are free to pray however your conscience dictates in any situation because that’s the law. … Commanders don’t know that anymore. So many of them actually think it is illegal to talk about Jesus. The commanders are well-intentioned, but they are also not interested in any lawsuits.”

                              Sackett and his commanding chaplain plan an officers’ training session regarding constitutional law and the free exercise of religion. But even chaplains are bewildered: New ones often ask Sackett if they can offer Bible verses or pray while counseling. Ten years ago, he says, base commanders would often announce upcoming religious events and chaplains would often open and close command level staff meetings with prayer. Not anymore.

                              Some confusion stems from the military’s own dizzying array of press releases about what is permitted. An Air Force statement this spring said service members could “express their personal religious beliefs as long as it does not make others uncomfortable.” Many chaplains wondered who would be deciding what is uncomfortable — and would this definition change over time?

                              The Pentagon then said service members could evangelize but not proselytize. That kicked off debate over the differences between evangelizing and proselytization. While chaplains at the conference agreed that coercion has no place in Christian faith, they worried that complex definitions of theological terms would have a chilling effect on discussion. They also discussed reports that the Army’s new definition of resilience has removed the word “spirituality” from the attributes needed for a soldier to overcome adversity.

                              Evangelical denominations face a hard choice: If they pull their support of chaplains because new rules don’t allow them to represent Christian belief, the gap will be filled by groups with liberal theology. Sackett said, “One of the reasons I am still in is I am afraid who might take my place.” But he may not get a chance to stay: “I think a time is shortly coming when chaplains who speak out on moral issues and on issues of community standards are going to be told go find a new job,” said Chuck Williams, an Army chaplain based in Hawaii.

                              Moral advising has long been one role of chaplains. On October 21, 1778, George Washington issued an order in which he called “purity of morals … highly conducive to order, subordination, and success in an army.” That is why Wells, the naval commander turned lawyer, fears the repercussions of a military without a moral check: “You know the old saying that there’s no atheists in the foxhole? Well God help us if all we have in foxholes are atheists.”

                              The chaplains also say the assault on religious liberty in the military, if allowed to stand, could expand to society at large. The military has often been a touchstone for cultural change: “It is just a matter of time before these same challenges are going to come to the local church,” said one chaplain who asked not to be identified because he had received direct orders from his commander not to talk to the media. “You have your head in the sand if you think that you are protected behind the church.”

                              Despite uncertainty, new chaplains are still entering the fray: The Presbyterian and Reformed Commission on Chaplains has approved 13 new chaplains so far this year. One of them, Ted Hamm, thought about joining the chaplaincy six years ago when he graduated from seminary, but the timing wasn’t right. Hamm ministered at a PCA church in Sarasota, Fla., but never lost his sense of calling to minister to teenagers leaving home for the first time to join the military and wondering what life is all about.

                              Last year, Hamm, getting close to the cut-off age of 42, filled out the 57-page application and was accepted. He left the June conference with the sobering realization that some in power “oppose what we do and what we believe,” but he said he has no regrets about joining: “My faith helps me to have a really big view of God and a peaceful calming view of his sovereignty in every situation. We have Christ on our side and we have God on our side and nothing can take that away.”

                              Hamm is more concerned about getting into shape so he can pass the physical requirements during his 13-week chaplain training school set for this fall. A personal trainer who goes to Hamm’s church is putting him on an exercise regime that includes running on an elevated treadmill while wearing weighted vests. He will have to run two miles within 18 minutes and do 35 pushups and 35 sit-ups in two minutes each, and he also wants to gain the respect of his future soldiers by running stride for stride with them even though he will be twice their age — even if that means jumping out of airplanes with the 82nd Airborne.

                              “That would be awesome,” Hamm said.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X