Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why is NASA ordering AR15's?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by LANTIRN View Post
    Five is what the article said.
    Yes I read that. I just do not see all the hoopla over 5 guns. It could have easily been 500. Sounds like some high ranking NASA official wants play toys.

    Comment


    • #17
      This is fucking stupid.
      "Any dog under 50lbs is a cat and cats are pointless." - Ron Swanson

      Comment


      • #18
        I wonder if that means they are finally opening the position for Space Shuttle Door Gunner.
        Fuck you. We're going to Costco.

        Comment


        • #19
          We have civilian guards on our base and they do not use their own weapons. They use weapons from the same Armory the Marine guards draw their weapons for. I'm sure that's how it works for NASA too even if they hire outside help to guard their stuff. They hire them then furnish the weapons.
          2004 Suzuki DL650
          1996 Hy-Tek Hurricane 103

          Comment


          • #20
            NASA keeps belt-fed MG3's on its helicopters.
            ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

            Comment


            • #21

              Comment


              • #22
                This is the new standard issue astronaut glock pistol.

                Interested in being a VIP member and donating to the site? Click here http://dfwmustangs.net/forums/payments.php

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by kbscobravert View Post
                  I wonder if that means they are finally opening the position for Space Shuttle Door Gunner.
                  IF they were, I'd have heard. I've had an application on file for years for such an eventuality
                  I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by likeitfast55 View Post
                    Yes I read that. I just do not see all the hoopla over 5 guns. It could have easily been 500. Sounds like some high ranking NASA official wants play toys.
                    Because Frost is fucking paranoid, and insane.
                    sigpic

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Magnus View Post
                      Because Frost is fucking paranoid, and insane.
                      It's not insane if agencies who have no business having weapons start having them at taxpayer expense. Like NASA and NOAA
                      I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I do like the irony. Weapons of war AR-15s with 30 round magazines bad for non-military you. Weapons of war AR-15s with 30 round magazines are ok for non-military NASA.
                        "Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul Harvey

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
                          It's not insane if agencies who have no business having weapons start having them at taxpayer expense. Like NASA and NOAA
                          There are hundreds of millions of dollars worth of equipment in some of those hangars. Do you mean to tell me that the people guarding it shouldn't be armed?

                          Originally posted by jdgregord84
                          This is fucking stupid.
                          That's my line, asshole!

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I think we just have to face the fact that the Russians beat us in the space (gun) race:






                            Double barrel shotgun on top, and a 5.45×39mm barrel below.
                            Originally posted by lincolnboy
                            After watching Games of Thrones, makes me glad i was not born in those years.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
                              It's not insane if agencies who have no business having weapons start having them at taxpayer expense. Like NASA and NOAA
                              Why don't NASA and the NOAA need guns?
                              ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by YALE View Post
                                Why don't NASA and the NOAA need guns?
                                Originally posted by FOREVER_FROST
                                Because Muricuh, tax payers, rabble rabble, freedom, my money, rabble, taxes, rabble, militia, rabble rabble, private army, rabble rabble, bald eagle, rabble.
                                ...
                                sigpic

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X