Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

50th Anniversary of JFK's Inaugural Address

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 50th Anniversary of JFK's Inaugural Address

    Today is the 50th anniversary of JFK's famous Inaugural Address. If you have the time, it is worth re-reading.

    Vice President Johnson, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Chief Justice, President Eisenhower, Vice President Nixon, President Truman, reverend clergy, fellow citizens:

    We observe today not a victory of party, but a celebration of freedom -- symbolizing an end, as well as a beginning -- signifying renewal, as well as change. For I have sworn before you and Almighty God the same solemn oath our forebears prescribed nearly a century and three-quarters ago.

    The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life. And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe -- the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God.

    We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that first revolution. Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans -- born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage, and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world.

    Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure the survival and the success of liberty.

    This much we pledge -- and more.

    To those old allies whose cultural and spiritual origins we share, we pledge the loyalty of faithful friends. United there is little we cannot do in a host of cooperative ventures. Divided there is little we can do -- for we dare not meet a powerful challenge at odds and split asunder.

    To those new states whom we welcome to the ranks of the free, we pledge our word that one form of colonial control shall not have passed away merely to be replaced by a far more iron tyranny. We shall not always expect to find them supporting our view. But we shall always hope to find them strongly supporting their own freedom -- and to remember that, in the past, those who foolishly sought power by riding the back of the tiger ended up inside.

    To those people in the huts and villages of half the globe struggling to break the bonds of mass misery, we pledge our best efforts to help them help themselves, for whatever period is required -- not because the Communists may be doing it, not because we seek their votes, but because it is right. If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.

    To our sister republics south of our border, we offer a special pledge: to convert our good words into good deeds, in a new alliance for progress, to assist free men and free governments in casting off the chains of poverty. But this peaceful revolution of hope cannot become the prey of hostile powers. Let all our neighbors know that we shall join with them to oppose aggression or subversion anywhere in the Americas. And let every other power know that this hemisphere intends to remain the master of its own house.

    To that world assembly of sovereign states, the United Nations, our last best hope in an age where the instruments of war have far outpaced the instruments of peace, we renew our pledge of support -- to prevent it from becoming merely a forum for invective, to strengthen its shield of the new and the weak, and to enlarge the area in which its writ may run.

    Finally, to those nations who would make themselves our adversary, we offer not a pledge but a request: that both sides begin anew the quest for peace, before the dark powers of destruction unleashed by science engulf all humanity in planned or accidental self-destruction.

    We dare not tempt them with weakness. For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed.

    But neither can two great and powerful groups of nations take comfort from our present course -- both sides overburdened by the cost of modern weapons, both rightly alarmed by the steady spread of the deadly atom, yet both racing to alter that uncertain balance of terror that stays the hand of mankind's final war.

    So let us begin anew -- remembering on both sides that civility is not a sign of weakness, and sincerity is always subject to proof. Let us never negotiate out of fear, but let us never fear to negotiate.

    Let both sides explore what problems unite us instead of belaboring those problems which divide us.

    Let both sides, for the first time, formulate serious and precise proposals for the inspection and control of arms, and bring the absolute power to destroy other nations under the absolute control of all nations.

    Let both sides seek to invoke the wonders of science instead of its terrors. Together let us explore the stars, conquer the deserts, eradicate disease, tap the ocean depths, and encourage the arts and commerce.

    Let both sides unite to heed, in all corners of the earth, the command of Isaiah -- to "undo the heavy burdens, and [to] let the oppressed go free."¹

    And, if a beachhead of cooperation may push back the jungle of suspicion, let both sides join in creating a new endeavor -- not a new balance of power, but a new world of law -- where the strong are just, and the weak secure, and the peace preserved.

    All this will not be finished in the first one hundred days. Nor will it be finished in the first one thousand days; nor in the life of this Administration; nor even perhaps in our lifetime on this planet. But let us begin.

    In your hands, my fellow citizens, more than mine, will rest the final success or failure of our course. Since this country was founded, each generation of Americans has been summoned to give testimony to its national loyalty. The graves of young Americans who answered the call to service surround the globe.

    Now the trumpet summons us again -- not as a call to bear arms, though arms we need -- not as a call to battle, though embattled we are -- but a call to bear the burden of a long twilight struggle, year in and year out, "rejoicing in hope; patient in tribulation,"² a struggle against the common enemies of man: tyranny, poverty, disease, and war itself.

    Can we forge against these enemies a grand and global alliance, North and South, East and West, that can assure a more fruitful life for all mankind? Will you join in that historic effort?

    In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility -- I welcome it. I do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light our country and all who serve it. And the glow from that fire can truly light the world.

    And so, my fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country.

    My fellow citizens of the world, ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man.

    Finally, whether you are citizens of America or citizens of the world, ask of us here the same high standards of strength and sacrifice which we ask of you. With a good conscience our only sure reward, with history the final judge of our deeds, let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God's work must truly be our own.

  • #2
    Thanks, I have never heard or read that whole speach. I have just heard the one famous quote. It is interesting how much are interests have changed, and how they really haven't.

    Comment


    • #3
      He could be a Republican in our current political atmosphere.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Vertnut View Post
        He could be a Republican in our current political atmosphere.
        Kennedy was probably the most liberal president we have had since WWII.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Cannonball996 View Post
          Kennedy was probably the most liberal president we have had since WWII.
          Which Liberal are you referring to?

          Liberal, as in Thimas Jefferson Liberal?

          Or Liberal as in FDR Liberal? Progressive/Wealth Redistributionist
          "The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." --FDR
          Last edited by sc281; 01-20-2011, 06:06 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            absolutely he was more of a progressive. he called for and created entitlements for the poor, the elderly, and minorities. he constantly talked about making peace with the soviet union, could you imagine obama saying he wants to sit down and negotiate a peace deal with iran or north korea? kennedy actually met with khruschchev and signed an arms treaty.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Cannonball996 View Post
              Kennedy was probably the most liberal president we have had since WWII.
              Times were a lot different. Remember, Kennedy got us into Viet Nam. He was war veteran (and hero) and believed in our military. Sure, he had some liberal in him, but he had some "hawk" in him, too. I was 3 when he was assassinated, but I still say he could run as a republican. Look at McCain and other RINO's running around.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Vertnut View Post
                Times were a lot different. Remember, Kennedy got us into Viet Nam. He was war veteran (and hero) and believed in our military. Sure, he had some liberal in him, but he had some "hawk" in him, too. I was 3 when he was assassinated, but I still say he could run as a republican. Look at McCain and other RINO's running around.
                all liberals have "hawk" in them, after all the military is a liberal institution, and mccain has always been very liberal for a republican he just recently flip flopped to win an election.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Cannonball996 View Post
                  absolutely he was more of a progressive. he called for and created entitlements for the poor, the elderly, and minorities. he constantly talked about making peace with the soviet union, could you imagine obama saying he wants to sit down and negotiate a peace deal with iran or north korea? kennedy actually met with khruschchev and signed an arms treaty.
                  Obama is missing a critical element, the respect of his opponents.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Cannonball996 View Post
                    all liberals have "hawk" in them, after all the military is a liberal institution, and mccain has always been very liberal for a republican he just recently flip flopped to win an election.
                    ALL liberals are hawks?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Cannonball996 View Post
                      all liberals have "hawk" in them, after all the military is a liberal institution, and mccain has always been very liberal for a republican he just recently flip flopped to win an election.
                      how do you figure the military is a liberal institution?
                      I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
                        how do you figure the military is a liberal institution?
                        Especially based on how they vote in presidential elections.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the Americans' freedom and before I leave office I must inform the Citizen of his plight.
                          PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY(10 days before he was murdered)

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Vertnut View Post
                            Especially based on how they vote in presidential elections.
                            And how they think, talk, act, what they believe in, etc. As usual the liberal is delusional.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
                              how do you figure the military is a liberal institution?
                              its a federal institution, it is a major part of BIG government, when you think about traditional liberalism, ie. Tax and Spend, its always been a favorite place for liberals to spend money.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X