Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US Prepares For Cruise Missile Attack on Syria

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pokulski-Blatz
    replied
    Really disappointed this bitch never came back like nothing happened.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pokulski-Blatz
    replied
    It is 12:31 AM 9/18/2013 and William Thomas Enox is still a bitch.

    Leave a comment:


  • stevo
    replied
    Originally posted by GhostTX View Post
    Yes, it was "tradition" to step down after two-terms, a precedent that George Washington started because he didn't want Presidents to constantly be in office for fear of a tyrant starting up again. Roosevelt did say "screw it" and constantly ran. You can argue if he was power hungry, or not wanting a change in leadership during a war. The states wisely put in the 22nd amendment after seeing the potential of a popular President constantly being reelected (Roosevelt).
    This will be his guise, and he has the Supreme Court in his pocket, he doesn't NEED to abide by the Constitution.

    Stevo

    Leave a comment:


  • Sgt Beavis
    replied
    You know your country is screwed when Russia takes the sane position.

    Leave a comment:


  • Captain Crawfish
    replied
    Putin has Obama scared like a Lil bitch.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pokulski-Blatz
    replied
    Originally posted by matts5.0 View Post
    dont worry frost, nasa has 5 ar15s.. We can all sleep safe at night now.
    lmao!

    Leave a comment:


  • matts5.0
    replied
    dont worry frost, NASA has 5 AR15s.. we can all sleep safe at night now.

    Leave a comment:


  • helosailor
    replied
    The Slava/Moskva and it's sister ships were and are that make the hair on the back of our Navy's neck stand up. We were always cognizant of where they were when we were at sea. They are serious business.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Russia’s Moskva missile cruiser, dubbed a “carrier-killer” by NATO, has passed through the Straits of Gibraltar and is now heading toward the eastern Mediterranean to assume command of the Russian naval force there.


    Russia’s ‘carrier-killer’ Moskva enters Mediterranean
    Published time: September 11, 2013 15:18
    Edited time: September 11, 2013 18:11 Get short URL
    Missile cruiser "Moskva" (RIA Novosti/Vitaliy Ankov)Missile cruiser "Moskva" (RIA Novosti/Vitaliy Ankov)


    Russia’s Moskva missile cruiser, dubbed a “carrier-killer” by NATO, has passed through the Straits of Gibraltar and is now heading toward the eastern Mediterranean to assume command of the Russian naval force there.

    The Russian Navy said in a statement that the Moskva cruiser passed through the Straits of Gibraltar on September 10.

    Interfax news agency added that the Moskva cruiser, “commanded by Sergey Tronev, Captain 1st Rank of the Guards… has enough room for maneuver now.”

    “The Black Sea flagship entered the Russian Navy's area of responsibility in the Mediterranean at 11:00 pm Moscow time yesterday," the agency reported a military source as saying.

    The missile-carrying cruiser is expected to join its final destination in eastern Mediterranean on September 15 or 16.

    Upon arrival, the command of the Russian Navy unit in the Mediterranean, currently stationed onboard the Admiral Panteleyev anti-submarine ship, will be relocated to the Moskva.

    "The armaments and technical equipment of the missile cruiser are in working condition. The crew is ready to perform combat missions,” the source said.

    Missile cruiser "Moskva" belonging to Russia's Black Sea Fleet firing anti-aircraft missiles during joint drills with other fleets. (RIA Novosti/Vitaliy Ankov)Missile cruiser "Moskva" belonging to Russia's Black Sea Fleet firing anti-aircraft missiles during joint drills with other fleets. (RIA Novosti/Vitaliy Ankov)

    The missile cruiser, initially known to Western naval intelligence as “Slava” (Glory), was launched in 1979 and entered service in 1983. It was later renamed the “Moskva” in 1995. Designed to be carrier-killers, the cruisers of Class 1164 are equipped with 16 anti-ship launchers P-1000 Vulkan, or Volcano (SS-N-12 Sandbox anti-ship missiles, according to NATO classification).

    ‘Moskva’ weaponry

    -16x SS-N-12 Sandbox anti-ship missiles
    - 8x8 (64) S-300PMU Favorit (SA-N-6 Grumble) long-range surface-to-air missiles
    -2x20 (40) OSA-MA (SA-N-4 Gecko) SR SAM
    -1x twin AK-130 130mm/L70 dual-purpose guns
    -6xAK-630 close-in weapons systems
    -2x RBU-6000 anti-submarine mortars
    -10x (2 quin) 533mm torpedo tubes
    Armor: Splinter plating
    Aircraft carried: 1 Ka-25 or Ka-27 helicopter
    Another two vessels, the landing ship Nikolay Filchenkov and the guard ship Smetlivy, will join the Russian naval unit later. They will be pass through the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits by September 12-14 and will then head to the eastern Mediterranean.

    Russia’s Defense Ministry has said the maneuvers are part of the “stage-by-stage rotation of warships and support ships of the standing naval force in the Mediterranean.”

    The recent deployments are aimed at “complex monitoring” of the situation around Syria, military sources told Interfax earlier.

    Russia’s standing naval force in the Mediterranean now involves landing craft carriers “Aleksandr Shabalin,” “Admiral Nevelskoy,” “Peresvet,” “Novocherkassk” and “Minsk” of Russia’s Black and Baltic Sea Fleets, as well as escort vessel “Neustrashimy,” and the anti-submarine ship “Admiral Panteleyev.”

    "Admiral Panteleyev" anti-submarine ship returning to Vladivostok from Japanese port Hakodate (Hokkaido island). (RIA Novosti/Vitaliy Ankov)"Admiral Panteleyev" anti-submarine ship returning to Vladivostok from Japanese port Hakodate (Hokkaido island). (RIA Novosti/Vitaliy Ankov)

    Russian naval maneuvers in the Mediterranean come amid growing tension in the region, which sparked speculation that Russia was boosting its naval presence ahead of a possible US strike against Syria.

    Previously, Russia’s defense officials cautioned against making connections between the relocation of warships and the Syrian crisis, saying the maneuvers do not depend on the situation and “will continue after it.”

    Leave a comment:


  • GhostTX
    replied
    Originally posted by stevo View Post
    Did I say they were?

    No, I said he will be setting himself up to stay in office longer than two terms. And I mentioned that Roosevelt stayed longer than two terms. Roosevelt used the war to garner support to be able to stay in office beyond what was the normally excepted limit. It was commonly agreed that a president to not stay in office beyond two terms, but Roosevelt decided to go against it. And since 0bama can not legally stay in office longer than two terms, he will do what ever it takes, specifically use Martial Law to suspend elections.

    Stevo
    Yes, it was "tradition" to step down after two-terms, a precedent that George Washington started because he didn't want Presidents to constantly be in office for fear of a tyrant starting up again. Roosevelt did say "screw it" and constantly ran. You can argue if he was power hungry, or not wanting a change in leadership during a war. The states wisely put in the 22nd amendment after seeing the potential of a popular President constantly being reelected (Roosevelt).

    Leave a comment:


  • Vertnut
    replied
    Originally posted by Chas_svo View Post
    Everyone should read up on Kerry and his pleas for Purple Hearts vs the injuries. Sunburns are serious shit!
    Hell, yeah! Laying out on the deck of that "swift boat" without sunscreen is a bitch!

    Leave a comment:


  • cyclonescott
    replied
    FACT CHECK: Obama's Syria case still lacks proof

    WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama voiced his conviction Tuesday night that Syrian President Bashar Assad was to blame for deadly chemical attacks against civilians, but again he offered no proof.

    A look at his remarks to the nation, seeking support for a military strike against Syria, and how they compare with the facts as publicly known:

    OBAMA: "We know the Assad regime was responsible.... The facts cannot be denied."

    THE FACTS: The Obama administration has not laid out proof Assad was behind the attack.

    The administration has cited satellite imagery and communications intercepts, backed by social media and intelligence reports from sources in Syria, as the basis for blaming the Assad government. But the only evidence the administration has made public is a collection of videos it has verified of the victims. The videos do not demonstrate who launched the attacks.

    Administration officials have not shared the satellite imagery they say shows rockets and artillery fire leaving government-held areas and landing in 12 rebel-held neighborhoods outside Damascus where chemical attacks were reported. Nor have they shared transcripts of the Syrian officials allegedly warning units to ready gas masks or discussing how to handle U.N. investigators after it happened.

    The White House has declined to explain where it came up with the figure of at least 1,429 dead, including 400 children — a figure far higher than estimates by nongovernmental agencies such as the British-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which has counted only victims identified by name, with a current total of 502. In his remarks, Obama more generally accused Assad's forces of gassing to death "over 1,000 people, including hundreds of children."

    ———

    OBAMA: "So even though I possess the authority to order military strikes, I believed it was right in the absence of a direct or imminent threat to our security to take this debate to Congress."

    THE FACTS: Obama's statement that he has the authority to launch military action is par for the course for presidents, and historically disputed by Congress. The issue never gets settled.

    The Constitution delineates power between the president, who serves as commander in chief of the armed forces, and Congress, which has the ability to declare war. Over time, however, questions arose over where the president's authority ends and where Congress' begins.

    The 1973 War Powers Resolution sought to end the debate, but it has only fueled arguments between Republican and Democratic administrations alike and those who consider themselves constitutional purists.

    The law gives the president the power to act without congressional approval in cases of national emergency for up to 60 days. In such a case, the president must consult with Congress. And if the deadline passes without congressional authorization, the president has 30 additional days to remove troops.

    But what constitutes a national emergency and what consultation means remain subjects of continued disputes.

    The Xfinity Discovery Hub is your resource for Xfinity product news, technology education, and more. Learn about TV, internet, home security, and more.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chas_svo
    replied
    Everyone should read up on Kerry and his pleas for Purple Hearts vs the injuries. Sunburns are serious shit!

    Leave a comment:


  • Vertnut
    replied
    Originally posted by BP View Post
    Not to mention a secretary of state that has a history of blowing up covert operations. One of the first things he did as a senator was head to Nicaragua to negotiate with Daniel Ortega, completely against what our government was trying to do.
    Considering the same man was a turn-coat to our country, this is no surprise. Anyone that isn't aware of his 3 "purple hearts" and how he got them, needs to read up on it. Symbolically tossing his medals over the Whitehouse fence was another act of idiocy...and they weren't even his.
    He has a long history of disliking this country.

    Leave a comment:


  • BP
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    This happens when you have a community organizer trying to match wits with the KGB
    Not to mention a secretary of state that has a history of blowing up covert operations. One of the first things he did as a senator was head to Nicaragua to negotiate with Daniel Ortega, completely against what our government was trying to do.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X