Originally posted by 4eyedwillie
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
US Prepares For Cruise Missile Attack on Syria
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by 4eyedwillie View PostReally? Did I miss something? I'm pretty sure we ARE the occupiers in both of the little hurrah's we're in right now. World War 2 we were attacked by another country and we defended ourselves and kicked their ass in the process. Which country invaded us this time? Since there wasn't a single Iraqi or Afgan in the bunch I'm confused. There where Saudis tho and Egyptians.I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool
Comment
-
Originally posted by 4eyedwillie View PostWould you believe it if I did? Not likelyOriginally posted by racrguy View PostA little fact checking into the claims of Fox News shows them to be inaccurate on some things and downright lying on others. Chicken Noodle Network and MSNBC aren't immune from this problem either.
Pity.
stevoOriginally posted by SSMAN...Welcome to the land of "Fuck it". No body cares, and if they do, no body cares.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Forever_frost View PostReally? When did Germany attack us? When did we get hit in WW1? What about Vietnam? There's a common thread through those....something about the presidents in charged when we got involved.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 4eyedwillie View PostIf we weren't there in the first place there would have been no need for him to protect his buddies would there? His personal actions I have no qualms with. The fact he was there and died for absolutely no reason THAT i have a problem with. Just like Frost he had his brains scrambled protecting a family that if we had not invaded would most likely not have needed protecting. Were his action honorable? yes Would they have been necessary if we had not invaded? NoOriginally posted by 4eyedwillie View PostI'm trying to get him to see the big picture. His brother didn't have to die. If we hadn't invaded he would still be alive. He would not have had to protect his brothers with his life.Originally posted by 4eyedwillie View PostHow was I talking shit? I just said he didn't have to die. If you haven't learned from our past conversations I could give a rats ass what a parts monkey thinks or says.Originally posted by 4eyedwillie View PostTruth hurt?
oh and blow me!
You want to keep playing this game, let me know. The outcome will be one of two things, you apologize and refrain from making any more comments, or I continue and things get real hard for you. This isn't all I have.
Burleson sex offender should get technician's license, judge says
By Darren Barbee
dbarbee@star-telegram.com
A Burleson man who pleaded guilty to participating with his wife in the sexual "education" of his 11-year-old stepdaughter should be allowed to enter homes and businesses as a licensed air conditioning and refrigeration technician, an administrative law judge has said, undercutting a state agency's stance.
In her order signed this week, Administrative Judge Anne Perez found that William Thomas Enox, 47, is a changed man who has worked hard to put his life back in order.
She noted that while indecency with a child is categorized as a sexually violent offense, "by all accounts Mr. Enox remained a passive participant and was not the primary instigator of the abuse.
"He testified that he has also given up destructive behaviors including alcohol, drugs and pornography, because those habits were inextricably linked to his offense."
Enox, a registered sex offender, pleaded guilty to one count of indecency with a child, a second-degree felony, in March 1998. He was granted deferred adjudication and placed under community supervision for 10 years, which he successfully completed.
The girl's mother, Cheryl Enox, 43, played a role in the abuse and is also a registered sex offender.
William Enox, who could not be reached for comment, is still married to the same woman.
The girl, who was not named in court documents, went to live with her biological father after she was abused.
Perez also noted that "a long time" has passed since Enox's crime and that he has committed no other offenses. Furthermore, Perez found that Enox supports his family, is a homeowner and pays his property and income taxes. He has also been a student at Tarrant County College, the University of Texas at Arlington and other universities.
Perez does not comment on her decisions, an official said. Her findings will be used by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation -- which proposed denying Enox a license -- to determine whether he is "fit" to be licensed, said Kerry Sullivan, general counsel for the State Office of Administrative Hearings.
Sullivan said the licensing department will consider the recommendation and will have some discretion in the outcome of the case. However, "they're typically bound by the facts as determined by the administrative law judge.
"They do have the discretion of applying the facts to the big question of whether this person should receive a license," he said.
Susan Stanford, spokeswoman for the licensing department, said the department has filed exceptions disagreeing with the judge's opinion.
"It will go to SOAH and they will look at it and either recommend change or not recommend a change" she said. "At that time it will come back to us and it will go before our commissioners, who will either accept or modify finding."
The abuse was brought to light in December 1996 after a Child Protective Services investigation.
The CPS report cited in state documents said that the 11-year-old, her mother and Enox were lying on a bed when the mother instructed her to touch her husband's genitals. William Enox, then 33, also kept adult pornography behind the headboard of his bed, and his stepdaughter had seen pictures of naked adults and children on a home computer, according to the report.
The report said that Cheryl Enox also abused the child. She did not deny her daughter's statements and said that she too, was sexually abused as a child and "explained she was attempting to teach [her daughter] about sex," according to state documents.
She was also given deferred adjudication and placed under community supervision for 10 years. She and her husband were required to participate in a sex-offender treatment program throughout their period of supervision.Last edited by Pokulski-Blatz; 08-25-2013, 11:08 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by stevo View PostSo does that mean you kids are NOT going to show proof to back-up your facts?
Pity.
stevo
FDR said no such thing, and even if he had, why would he then protect collective bargaining with things like the National Industrial Recovery Act, or the Tennessee Valley Recovery Act?
I just showed that Fox News is both inaccurate and lying. Care to shut the fuck up now?
Edit: I was looking for a link for the Beck video that I missed the post by pokulsky-blatz. HOLY BALLS!Last edited by racrguy; 08-25-2013, 10:24 PM.
Comment
Comment