Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Senate Passes Bill Making the Harassment of a Police Officer a Crime

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Senate Passes Bill Making the Harassment of a Police Officer a Crime

    The New York State Senate today passed a bill that creates the crime of aggravated harassment of a police or peace officer. The bill (S.2402), sponsored by Senator Joe Griffo (R-C-I, Rome) would make it a felony to harass, annoy, or threaten a police officer while on duty.

    “Our system of laws is established to protect the foundations of our society,” Senator Griffo said. “Police officers who risk their lives every day in our cities and on our highways deserve every possible protection, and those who treat them with disrespect, harass them and create situations that can lead to injuries deserve to pay a price for their actions.”

    The bill establishes this crime as a Class E Felony, punishable by up to four years in prison.

    “At a time when shocking incidents of disrespect and outright confrontation are at an all-time high, the men and women who patrol the streets of our cities deserve every possible protection we can offer them,” Senator Griffo stated. “My bill would make it a crime to take any type of physical action to try to intimidate a police officer. This is a necessary action because we can see from the rise in incidents that too many people in our society have lost the respect they need to have for a police officer. We need to make it very clear that when a police officer is performing his duty, every citizen needs to comply and that refusal to comply carries a penalty.”

    “Professionally, I am grateful to see this bill pass through the Senate. Our police officers have a very dangerous job and need the support of our government leaders to help make them safe,” said Utica Police Department Chief Mark Williams. “All too often persons are physically challenging police officers in the line of duty. Currently in those instances where an officer is physically attack (short of sustaining a physical injury) the lawful charge is only a violation. The consequences are way too low for the offender and it sends the wrong message to the public. Police officers are the public’s first line of defense to restore order in dangerous/chaotic situations. Citizens do not have the legal right to physically challenge the authority of an officer lawfully performing their duties. Threats, intimidation and physical force used upon our police officers not only erode respect for our criminal justice system, but also endanger the public as well.

    The bill is being sent to the Assembly.

    I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

  • #2
    Another reason to hate new york.

    Comment


    • #3
      Can't have the JBT's feelin threatened as they fuck with the slaves.

      Comment


      • #4
        A felony to annoy a cop, what kinda BS is that? Talisman better hope that shit doesn't spread to TX

        Comment


        • #5
          I think I'm on the fence on this one. There are a lot of fucksticks out there who go out of their way to fuck with cops when the cop is not doing anything wrong other than wearing the uniform and trying to earn a living and keep the peace. On the other hand...there are a lot of hot-headed overzealous badge wearing assholes out there that could use a good ass beating and a taste of street justice. I've encountered both. Some people shouldn't be wearing the uniform and gun. AND....some people SHOULD be charged for their actions toward cops and law enforcement.

          Comment


          • #6
            I can understand obstruction of justice to an extent, but if a cop is told to fuck off by somebody who isn't really doing anything wrong goes to prison for 4 years, that is fucked up. Although, it sounds like a law that will be plea bargained into hefty fines time and time again. Probably about money more than anything.
            "Any dog under 50lbs is a cat and cats are pointless." - Ron Swanson

            Comment


            • #7
              I tend to err on the side of treating cops like the citizens they police
              I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by UserX View Post
                A felony to annoy a cop, what kinda BS is that? Talisman better hope that shit doesn't spread to TX
                03trublugt is already asking his union rep to lobby for it.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Why didn't you put New York or NY in the title?

                  Oh and fuck NY.
                  "It's another burrito, it's a cold Lone Star in my hand!"

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by ram57ta View Post
                    I think I'm on the fence on this one. There are a lot of fucksticks out there who go out of their way to fuck with cops when the cop is not doing anything wrong other than wearing the uniform and trying to earn a living and keep the peace. On the other hand...there are a lot of hot-headed overzealous badge wearing assholes out there that could use a good ass beating and a taste of street justice. I've encountered both. Some people shouldn't be wearing the uniform and gun. AND....some people SHOULD be charged for their actions toward cops and law enforcement.
                    You realize how loose the terms "annoy" and "harass" are though, right? Look at a cop wrong, and BAM you're a felon. Cops are public servants and the penalty for "harassing" them shouldn't be different than anyone else.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I haven't seen this before so I'll just throw it out here, looks reasonable to me.

                      Law Enforcement Officers Bill of Rights

                      http://www.grandlodgefop.org/legisla...br/index.shtml

                      :Law enforcement officers shall, if disciplinary action is expected, be notified of the investigation, the nature of the alleged violation, and be notified of the outcome of the investigation and the recommendations made to superiors by the investigators;

                      :Questioning of a law enforcement officer should be conducted for a reasonable length of time and preferably while the officer is on duty unless exigent circumstances apply;

                      :Questioning of the law enforcement officer should take place at the offices of those conducting the investigation or at the place where the officer reports to work, unless the officer consents to another location;

                      :Law enforcement officers will be questioned by no more than two investigators, and he or she shall be informed of the name, rank and command of the officers conducting the investigation;

                      :Law enforcement officers under investigation are entitled to have counsel or any other individual of their choice present at the interrogation;

                      :Law enforcement officers cannot be threatened, harassed or promised rewards to induce the answering of any question;

                      :Law enforcement officers are entitled to a hearing, with notification in advance of the date, access to transcripts and other relevant documents and evidence generated by the hearing and to representation by counsel or another non-attorney representative at the hearing;

                      :Law enforcement officers shall have the opportunity to comment in writing on any adverse materials placed in his or her personnel file; and

                      :Law enforcement officers cannot be subject to retaliation for the exercise of these or any other rights under Federal, State or local law.
                      Don't worry about what you can't change.
                      Do the best you can with what you have.
                      Be honest, even if it hurts.

                      "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery" ... Winston Churchill

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        It's been nice knowing you guys.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          group bail fund for ya, more likely, if you start shit it will be a hospital bill fund!
                          Don't worry about what you can't change.
                          Do the best you can with what you have.
                          Be honest, even if it hurts.

                          "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery" ... Winston Churchill

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by jyro View Post
                            I haven't seen this before so I'll just throw it out here, looks reasonable to me.

                            Law Enforcement Officers Bill of Rights

                            http://www.grandlodgefop.org/legisla...br/index.shtml

                            :Law enforcement officers shall, if disciplinary action is expected, be notified of the investigation, the nature of the alleged violation, and be notified of the outcome of the investigation and the recommendations made to superiors by the investigators;

                            :Questioning of a law enforcement officer should be conducted for a reasonable length of time and preferably while the officer is on duty unless exigent circumstances apply;

                            :Questioning of the law enforcement officer should take place at the offices of those conducting the investigation or at the place where the officer reports to work, unless the officer consents to another location;

                            :Law enforcement officers will be questioned by no more than two investigators, and he or she shall be informed of the name, rank and command of the officers conducting the investigation;

                            :Law enforcement officers under investigation are entitled to have counsel or any other individual of their choice present at the interrogation;

                            :Law enforcement officers cannot be threatened, harassed or promised rewards to induce the answering of any question;

                            :Law enforcement officers are entitled to a hearing, with notification in advance of the date, access to transcripts and other relevant documents and evidence generated by the hearing and to representation by counsel or another non-attorney representative at the hearing;

                            :Law enforcement officers shall have the opportunity to comment in writing on any adverse materials placed in his or her personnel file; and

                            :Law enforcement officers cannot be subject to retaliation for the exercise of these or any other rights under Federal, State or local law.
                            If only those applied to the citizens...
                            I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by sc281 View Post
                              03trublugt is already asking his union rep to lobby for it.

                              Bullshit; I doubt that any peace officer in TX would want that.
                              Magnus, I am your father. You need to ask your mother about a man named Calvin Klein.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X