The Benghazi Scandal Grows

[talisman]

All we need is for the dems to turn on her like they did when she faced Barry, or possibly discourage her from running altogether. There's a faction of dems that are talking about Biden running. Why, I don't know (and it scares the shit outta me).

I'd vote for a fucking sea monkey before I'd vote for Biden. That guy makes Dan Quayle look like Stephen Hawking.

[Lajntx]

Trey Gowdy was interviewed on Fox yesterday and asked about more whistle blowers, he admitted that there were others who stepped forward. When the reporter ask if it was 1 or 2, Gowdy answered "more than 2"

If there is something to this, then let`s hear it. However, in the end, I`m sure Fox is milking/manufacturing this story for all they can, and will drag it on for as long as they can until the Republican Entertainment Complex tells them to stop.

In the end, everyone who was going to vote Republican irreguardless in `14 & `16 will do so, and eveyone that was going to vote Democrat will as well. The few clueless people out there will probably vote Democratic as well because of Fox crying "wolf" all the time for ratings purposes and never turning up anything substantial to prove the allegations.

[Forever_frost]

MSNBC mentions coverup and impeachment

MSNBC has been one of the media lapdogs for the Obama administration. Far from being a news organization, it is a merely a mouth-piece for Socialists and the far Left and they have towed that line consistently. However, now even MSNBC is beginning to wake up on the issue of Benghazi and turn on their faux messiah, Barack Hussein Obama. MSNBC is now claiming that Benghazi was not only a terrible event, but it was a cover-up, that the administration lied, that people didn’t have to die, and (gasp) it may just be worthy of impeachment!




Notice how the comparison of Watergate comes up first thing and notice what is pointed out. “They didn’t kill people. They didn’t try to get their staff killed.”

It gets worse though. Here are some of the quotes that followed:

“They were trying to save face after something terrible had happened and try to prevent, what looks like the accurate perception that they had not been careful enough in Benghazi.”

“They had been sloppy about security and ignored warnings.”

They even say the State Department’s Victoria Nuland claims the leadership is worried about the way this points to Hillary Clinton and her deputies and the way the White House defers to them!

Ha! Well that tells us quite a bit doesn’t it? These people will be ready to throw Hillary under the bus, again. They’ve already done it once in the Benghazi scandal. Why not back the bus up over her again?

They even brought up the issue of Obama “sitting on” Benghazi for political reasons. One commentator said “Sure it becomes a political issue.” Only he didn’t mean just for 2012, but he said for 2014, 2016 and even impeachment.

Yep, we’re way ahead of you by like almost eight months, but hey, we’re glad to have them onboard now.

The moment the female commentator put her two cents worth in, it was all downhill. “I think for Clinton, it’s almost Clintonian,” she said, referring back to Clinton’s involvement in her philanderer husband’s criminal activity when he was president. I simply rolled my eyes at a comment that attempted to be substantive. However, it is clear that she has no love for the truth, but for the Left as she talked about the “Right” hating both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

They also went on to point out that this would be a first line of attack against Hillary should she not be in prison and run for the presidency in 2016.

What’s so disgusting about all of this is how people want to analyze this issue as “political.” My fellow Americans, this is not political. It’s criminal. I don’t know why in the United States we refer to immorality and criminal activity as “political issues.” They are not. Illegal immigration, abortion, homosexuality and yes the murder of four Americans in Benghazi and the subsequent cover-up is not political. It’s criminal.

One thing can be said for the blogging world and for activism. It works. If we are persistent, eventually we get the truth to come out. Now, we simply want justice.

Tim Brown is the Editor of Freedom Outpost and a regular contributor to The D.C. Clothesline.

http://dcclothesline.com/2013/05/11/hell-hath-frozen-over-msnbc-turns-on-obama-calls-benghazi-cover-up-mentions-impeachment/?fb_source=pubv1

[Forever_frost]

If there is something to this, then let`s hear it. However, in the end, I`m sure Fox is milking/manufacturing this story for all they can, and will drag it on for as long as they can until the Republican Entertainment Complex tells them to stop.

In the end, everyone who was going to vote Republican irreguardless in `14 & `16 will do so, and eveyone that was going to vote Democrat will as well. The few clueless people out there will probably vote Democratic as well because of Fox crying "wolf" all the time for ratings purposes and never turning up anything substantial to prove the allegations.

Know how I know you're a fucktard?

[Trip McNeely]

Lajntx = Zarathustra the taco pusher?

[sc281]

Lajntx = Zarathustra the taco pusher?

Prolly not. Even though zarathustra was an idiot, even he would have been able to spell and use regardless properly.

This kid makes Nay Nay look smart.

[Trip McNeely]

He posts very similar to him.

[Forever_frost]

Let's see him spin MSNBC's mentioning of coverup and impeachment into Bush and Fox and the right's fault

[Vertnut]

Know how I know you're a fucktard?

LMAO! You mean like misspelling a nonexistent word?

[Forever_frost]

This week was not the first time Cheryl Mills’ name has come up in a controversial manner at a congressional oversight hearing. In fact, it’s not the first time Ms. Mills has been the subject of potential wrongdoing in the very same hearing room--Room 2154 in the Rayburn House Office Building to be exact.
While being questioned under oath by Congressman Jim Jordan (R-OH) on Wednesday, former Deputy Ambassador to Libya Gregory Hicks testified that then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, was “very upset” when she called him about his cooperation with congressional investigators.
Mr. Hicks offered an unbecoming view of political supervision and intimidation inside the Obama administration. When Representative Jason Chaffetz, Republican of Utah, visited Libya after the attack, Mr. Hicks said his bosses told him not to talk to the congressman. When he did anyway, and a State Department lawyer was excluded from one meeting because he lacked the necessary security clearance, Mr. Hicks said he received an angry phone call from Mrs. Clinton’s chief of staff, Cheryl Mills.
Throughout the 1990s, Mills was a big part of the Clinton White House counsel’s office “damage control” detail. Name a Clinton scandal, and Cheryl Mills was usually running interference for the Clintons with congressional investigators. In fact, in 1998, Mills allegedly crossed the line in her dealings with the House Government Reform and Oversight Committee, who felt it was necessary to send a criminal referral to the Department of Justice regarding Mills’ activities and testimony on behalf of the Clinton White House.
According to a January 22, 1999 article in The Washington Times:
Just last September [1998], Rep. Dan Burton wrote to the Justice Department requesting that Ms. Mills be prosecuted for lying under oath and for concealing documents sought under subpoena, charges that grew out of a House Committee on Government Oversight and Reform investigation. The committee was attempting to discover whether government computers and federal employees had been used to compile a White House database - a list of potential donors that was passed on to the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton/Gore campaign. If those public resources were used for political fundraising, several different laws were violated, including statutes against the theft of government property. Ms. Mills was the White House point person dealing with congressional requests for information. She was quite effective in thwarting congressional investigators - she hid documents that would have been damaging to the White House. When caught, she was questioned under oath by the committee, and denied hiding any subpoenaed papers. The committee concluded that Ms. Mills committed perjury in her effort to cover up her initial obstruction of justice.
The Washington Times piece is based on an official congressional report from 1998 that has a section on page three entitled: “Deputy Counsel To The President Cheryl Mills Lied To The Committee And Obstructed The Investigation By Withholding Documents.”
The dam has indeed broken.
ABC News is adding to a breaking story, first reported by Stephen Hayes of the Weekly Standard, where 12 highly-edited drafts of talking points about Benghazi have been discovered. The mainstream media must stop ignoring the story about why the Obama Administration removed references to Islamic terrorism and tried to blame the murder of four Americans, including our Ambassador to Libya, on a YouTube video.
The fact that one of the Clintons’ most trusted lawyers was involved in this level of minutiae with regard to the Benghazi investigation is just another reason for a Select Committee--it’s clearly time for Speaker Boehner to bring House Resolution 36 to the floor for a vote. Momentum is continuing to build--there are now a whopping 145 co-sponsors supporting the resolution in the U.S. House, and The Wall Street Journal editorial board endorsed the select committee this week as well.
Let’s create the Select Committee, zero in on the facts, and get to the bottom of what happened last September 11th in Benghazi. We owe it to the families who lost loved ones to learn just what Cheryl Mills was so concerned congressional investigators would find out.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/05/10/Benghazi-Leads-To-Name-From-Investigations-Past

[sig239]

Huckabee might be hoping The Clinton machine will force the Dems to throw Obama under the bus in order to prove to America that they aren't going to let anyone in their party screw us all like he has.

It would be one of the greatest spectacles on TV in our generation.

This the clintons are known for there body count. She wont take this quietly. This is going to get NASTY.

[sig239]

Like Perjury ever did shit against a Clinton.

watergate? white water?

[jdgregory84]

This week was not the first time Cheryl Mills’ name has come up in a controversial manner at a congressional oversight hearing. In fact, it’s not the first time Ms. Mills has been the subject of potential wrongdoing in the very same hearing room--Room 2154 in the Rayburn House Office Building to be exact.
While being questioned under oath by Congressman Jim Jordan (R-OH) on Wednesday, former Deputy Ambassador to Libya Gregory Hicks testified that then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, was “very upset” when she called him about his cooperation with congressional investigators.
Mr. Hicks offered an unbecoming view of political supervision and intimidation inside the Obama administration. When Representative Jason Chaffetz, Republican of Utah, visited Libya after the attack, Mr. Hicks said his bosses told him not to talk to the congressman. When he did anyway, and a State Department lawyer was excluded from one meeting because he lacked the necessary security clearance, Mr. Hicks said he received an angry phone call from Mrs. Clinton’s chief of staff, Cheryl Mills.
Throughout the 1990s, Mills was a big part of the Clinton White House counsel’s office “damage control” detail. Name a Clinton scandal, and Cheryl Mills was usually running interference for the Clintons with congressional investigators. In fact, in 1998, Mills allegedly crossed the line in her dealings with the House Government Reform and Oversight Committee, who felt it was necessary to send a criminal referral to the Department of Justice regarding Mills’ activities and testimony on behalf of the Clinton White House.
According to a January 22, 1999 article in The Washington Times:
Just last September [1998], Rep. Dan Burton wrote to the Justice Department requesting that Ms. Mills be prosecuted for lying under oath and for concealing documents sought under subpoena, charges that grew out of a House Committee on Government Oversight and Reform investigation. The committee was attempting to discover whether government computers and federal employees had been used to compile a White House database - a list of potential donors that was passed on to the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton/Gore campaign. If those public resources were used for political fundraising, several different laws were violated, including statutes against the theft of government property. Ms. Mills was the White House point person dealing with congressional requests for information. She was quite effective in thwarting congressional investigators - she hid documents that would have been damaging to the White House. When caught, she was questioned under oath by the committee, and denied hiding any subpoenaed papers. The committee concluded that Ms. Mills committed perjury in her effort to cover up her initial obstruction of justice.
The Washington Times piece is based on an official congressional report from 1998 that has a section on page three entitled: “Deputy Counsel To The President Cheryl Mills Lied To The Committee And Obstructed The Investigation By Withholding Documents.”
The dam has indeed broken.
ABC News is adding to a breaking story, first reported by Stephen Hayes of the Weekly Standard, where 12 highly-edited drafts of talking points about Benghazi have been discovered. The mainstream media must stop ignoring the story about why the Obama Administration removed references to Islamic terrorism and tried to blame the murder of four Americans, including our Ambassador to Libya, on a YouTube video.
The fact that one of the Clintons’ most trusted lawyers was involved in this level of minutiae with regard to the Benghazi investigation is just another reason for a Select Committee--it’s clearly time for Speaker Boehner to bring House Resolution 36 to the floor for a vote. Momentum is continuing to build--there are now a whopping 145 co-sponsors supporting the resolution in the U.S. House, and The Wall Street Journal editorial board endorsed the select committee this week as well.
Let’s create the Select Committee, zero in on the facts, and get to the bottom of what happened last September 11th in Benghazi. We owe it to the families who lost loved ones to learn just what Cheryl Mills was so concerned congressional investigators would find out.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...tigations-Past

It blows my mind how that the "Obillary" administration is STILL under investigation. It's so fucking obvious that they lied about the entire Benghazi massacre. This should be an open and shut case. "Four Americans died under your watch. Did you do anything to prevent it? No? You're under arrest for treason."

[Forever_frost]

Reid won't let it come to trial and Dems have already decided they're not holding Obama responsible. In another note, the film maker is STILL in jail

[YALE]

watergate? white water?

Yeah, clearly those stopped them in their tracks.