Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama admin. Has reportedly cut budget for domestic bombing prevention program by 45%

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Obama admin. Has reportedly cut budget for domestic bombing prevention program by 45%

    While President Barack Obama has made little effort to curb out of control spending in Washington since taking office in 2009, he has drastically cut the budget for the Office of Bombing Prevention, the Daily Mail reports. The revelation comes just one day after two bombs tore through Boston, killing at least three and injuring at least 173.

    “Under President George W. Bush, the Department of Homeland Security had $20 million allocated for preventing the use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) by terrorists working inside the United States. The current White House has cut that funding down to $11 million,” the report states.

    Robert Liscouski, a former Homeland Security Assistant Secretary for Infrastructure Protection, brought the information forward following the Boston Marathon bombings on Monday.

    Liscouski told the Daily Mail that DHS is still about as well-positioned as it was under Bush’s presidency, but added that “the Obama administration has continued to cut the budget for offices such as the Office for Bombing Prevention from $20 million started under Bush, to $11 million today.”


    (http://www.dhs.gov/obp)
    Meanwhile, the Defense Department’s Joint IED Defeat Organizations had an annual budget of $1 billion to help prevent IEDs in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    “Clearly more money needs to be focused on countering domestic IEDs,” Liscouski said.


    The Daily Mail has more details:

    The Office for Bombing Prevention (OBP) was created in 2003 when the Department of Homeland Security was founded. Its original name was the WMD/Bombing Prevention Unit, and it was part of the department’s Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection Directorate.
    The sub-agency was renamed the Office for Bombing Prevention in 2006, according to a 2009 DHS briefing booklet obtained by MailOnline and marked ‘FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY.’
    It is important to note that to what extent OBP actually plays in preventing bombings at public events, like the tragic attack in Boston, is not entirely clear.

    According to the official OBP website, “The Office for Bombing Prevention (OBP) leads the Department of Homeland Security’s efforts to implement the National Policy for Countering Improvised Explosive Devices and enhance the Nation’s ability to prevent, protect against, respond to, and mitigate the terrorist use of explosives against critical infrastructure, the private sector, and Federal, State, local, tribal, and territorial entities.”

    Patrick Starke has reportedly headed the OBP since August 2012. He is a seasoned security expert and has experience with a defense contractor, the Navy and as an explosive ordinance disposal officer, the Daily Mail notes.

    To read the Daily Mail’s entire report, click here.

    I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

  • #2
    There are somethings you can throw all the money you want at it, and you won't be able to prevent it. This seems like political jostling to me more than anything.

    I feel like a broken record, but we'll all dislike some/a lot of the budget reductions. However, I'd still have not seen reduction in welfare...etc type programs. Could be wrong and missed it - but ya know....
    Originally posted by MR EDD
    U defend him who use's racial slurs like hes drinking water.

    Comment


    • #3
      Oh, I just thought it was amusing that he cuts it by 45% while closing the WH and going on multi-million dollar vacations and acting shocked, SHOCKED I tell you, that this Boston incident happened.

      Notice that anytime they offer up entitlements, it's not the actual entitlement? You pay for medicare and social security. You pay for medicaid but if you're paying taxes you can't use it. Cut that completely out.
      I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by ceyko View Post
        There are somethings you can throw all the money you want at it, and you won't be able to prevent it. This seems like political jostling to me more than anything.

        I feel like a broken record, but we'll all dislike some/a lot of the budget reductions. However, I'd still have not seen reduction in welfare...etc type programs. Could be wrong and missed it - but ya know....
        Though not a welfare program per se, the sequester has cut unemployment benefits in some states.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by The King View Post
          Though not a welfare program per se, the sequester has cut unemployment benefits in some states.
          Yeah - I ride the fence on that one - but reality is it's a program that is abuse as well. Rather see stricter qualifications and requirements to use it. We all know and/or have seen the people on the government (our) tit for many years that are druggies, lazy and down right worthless.
          Originally posted by MR EDD
          U defend him who use's racial slurs like hes drinking water.

          Comment

          Working...
          X