Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bankrupt San Bernardino approves over $1 mln in pay hikes

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bankrupt San Bernardino approves over $1 mln in pay hikes

    * Bankrupt city forced to hike salaries because of old charter

    * Mayor decries "autopilot" wage increases during bankruptcy

    * City due in federal court on Thursday

    By Tim Reid

    LOS ANGELES, March 19 (Reuters) - The bankrupt city of San Bernardino, California, approved over $1 million in pay increases for police and firefighters despite claims it can barely make payroll, let alone afford the salary hikes.

    Monday night's pay increases, for a city that appears before a federal judge again this week to plead for bankruptcy protection, are a result of its charter. It mandates that pay for safety workers must be tied to salary levels for 10 similar- sized California cities, all of which are wealthier than San Bernardino.

    The bankruptcy of the city 65 miles east of Los Angeles is a national test case on whether the pensions of government workers take precedence over other payments in a municipal bankruptcy. It is a high-stakes issue for pension plans and their beneficiaries, and for Wall Street bondholders who lend money to governments.

    Moves to have the city charter overturned, so the city can set its own pay levels, have failed to get the majority needed on the city council in the past year.

    Council members opposing a charter change have received campaign contributions from police and fire unions in past elections. They argue that police and firefighters would leave San Bernardino if they were not paid wages similar to other cities.

    In a largely symbolic vote because of the charter mandate, the council voted on Monday night to approve $156,841 in compensation for a few police and fire managers.

    That followed a vote last week in which nearly $965,000 in pay increases for rank-and-file police and firefighters - again because salary levels for safety workers are set by a formula calculated on wage levels set by 10 other cities.

    Most of those cities have tax bases and property values significantly higher than San Bernardino's - and none are in bankruptcy. Average home values in other California cities considered by the charter, such as Irvine or Pasadena, are three times San Bernardino's.

    Most California cities also have the power to set salary levels for their own workers. Another California city currently in bankruptcy - Stockton - has the power to set wage levels for its safety workers.

    San Bernardino filed for bankruptcy on August 1, citing a $46 million deficit for the current fiscal year and little leeway to meet day-to-day expenses, including payroll.

    Fred Shorett, one of two council members to cast a symbolic "no" vote on the pay increases as a way to protest the city charter, said it was madness for the city to have wage levels tied to wealthier cities.

    "This ties our hands during these very difficult times," Shorett said.

    Pat Morris, San Bernardino's mayor, said during last week's vote that during the city's bankruptcy, it was "remarkably unwise" to be "on autopilot on our most expensive single item" - that is, police and firefighter pay.

    A federal bankruptcy judge has yet to rule on the city's eligibility for bankruptcy protection.

    The bankruptcy court proceedings are still in an early stage, with the city and its creditors - notably Calpers, the public employee retirement system and America's biggest pension fund - wrangling over the production of financial records. The next hearing is set for Thursday.

    San Bernardino halted its twice-monthly pension payments to Calpers in August, an unprecedented step for a city. Calpers argues that it has primacy over other creditors in the bankruptcy, a claim Wall Street bondholders dispute.

    I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

  • #2
    I cannot understand how a city can go bankrupt. You staff according to need and taxation levels. If tax revenues fall, you decrease costs with layoffs and reductions in social services. If people want more cops and more services, they can vote for tax increases. Oh wait, this logic is also valid at state and federal levels.
    When the government pays, the government controls.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by 46Tbird View Post
      I cannot understand how a city can go bankrupt. You staff according to need and taxation levels. If tax revenues fall, you decrease costs with layoffs and reductions in social services. If people want more cops and more services, they can vote for tax increases. Oh wait, this logic is also valid at state and federal levels.
      When government has a surplus it usually makes up new things to spend money on.
      Originally posted by racrguy
      What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
      Originally posted by racrguy
      Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by 46Tbird View Post
        I cannot understand how a city can go bankrupt. You staff according to need and taxation levels. If tax revenues fall, you decrease costs with layoffs and reductions in social services. If people want more cops and more services, they can vote for tax increases. Oh wait, this logic is also valid at state and federal levels.
        Simple. You have politicians getting cash from unions who get paid by their members so you increase public workers who pay into the union that pays back into your campaign. When things get tough, the contracts are still in place and legacy costs have to be paid, which funds the unions even more despite the burden on taxpayers.
        I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

        Comment


        • #5
          Not to mention growing pensions and a shrinking tax stream.
          "Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul Harvey

          Comment

          Working...
          X