Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Warning flare fired at Iranian jet trailing U.S. Predator

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Warning flare fired at Iranian jet trailing U.S. Predator

    Warning flare fired at Iranian jet trailing U.S. Predator

    By Brian Everstine - Staff writer
    Posted : Thursday Mar 14, 2013 15:44:50 EDT

    An American fighter jet was forced to shoot a flare to deter an Iranian F-4 on Thursday as it pursued an Air Force MQ-1 Predator over international waters.

    The MQ-1 was flying unarmed reconnaissance over the Arabian Gulf when it was approached by the F-4, Pentagon spokesman George Little said in a statement. The Iranian jet came within 16 miles of the unmanned Predator.

    Two American fighter jets were escorting the Predator and fired the flare as a warning, ending the situation. All American aircraft remained in international waters, Little said.

    Last November, an Iranian Su-25 jet fired on an unarmed MQ-1 in international waters, according to the Pentagon. After that incident, the U.S. told Iran that it would continue to fly the surveillance flights and “we reserve the right to protect our military assets as well as our forces and will continue to do so going forward.”

    I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

  • #2
    Their air force must really suck, if they have to use ground attack aircraft as interceptors.
    ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by YALE View Post
      Their air force must really suck, if they have to use ground attack aircraft as interceptors.
      Or how about, why were they able to ID an airborne drone in the first place?
      How do we forget ourselves? How do we forget our minds?

      Comment


      • #4
        Doesn't it bother you that you have to get up in the morning and you have to put on a bunch of pieces of flair?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Geor! View Post
          Or how about, why were they able to ID an airborne drone in the first place?
          The U.S. isn't the only country to have radar. Besides, those drones we use aren't the smallest aircraft in the world.

          General Characteristics
          Primary Function: Armed reconnaissance, airborne surveillance and target acquisition
          Contractor: General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc.
          Power Plant: Rotax 914F four cylinder engine
          Thrust: 115 horsepower
          Wingspan: 55 feet (16.8 meters)
          Length: 27 feet (8.22 meters)
          Height: 6.9 feet (2.1 meters)
          Weight: 1,130 pounds ( 512 kilograms) empty
          Maximum takeoff weight: 2,250 pounds (1,020 kilograms)
          Fuel Capacity: 665 pounds (100 gallons)
          Payload: 450 pounds (204 kilograms)
          Speed: Cruise speed around 84 mph (70 knots), up to 135 mph
          Range: Up to 770 miles (675 nautical miles)
          Ceiling: Up to 25,000 feet (7,620 meters)
          Armament: Two laser-guided AGM-114 Hellfire missiles
          Crew (remote): Two (pilot and sensor operator)
          Initial operational capability: March 2005
          Unit Cost: $20 million (fiscal 2009 dollars) (includes four aircraft, a ground control station and a Predator Primary Satellite Link)
          Originally posted by Jester
          Every time you see the fucking guy....show him your fucking dick.. Just whip out your hawg and wiggle it in his direction, put it away, call him a fuckin meatgazer, shoot him the bird and go inside.
          He will spend the rest of the day wondering if he is gay.
          Originally posted by Denny
          What the fuck ever, you fucking fragile faggot.
          FORGTN SOLD1ER - xbox gamer

          Comment


          • #6
            F-4? I'm surprised they can even keep 55-year-old planes in the air.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by YALE View Post
              Their air force must really suck, if they have to use ground attack aircraft as interceptors.
              F-4s have a lot of 60s air to air capabilities the new missiles we so good they didn't even build it with a gun. Did have AIM-9 s and AIM-7s

              ***edit I wonder if we sold them the version with the gun pods?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Vertnut View Post
                F-4? I'm surprised they can even keep 55-year-old planes in the air.
                F4 is one of the most capable jet fighters the US military ever flew...it served in all branches in various roles and was still being used into the 90's...just because its old doesn't mean its not capable in certain roles.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Shit the f15 is 40 years old and it is the best fighter plane to have ever graced this planet. 120 something kills, zero losses.

                  Technological plateaus suck.
                  Originally posted by lincolnboy
                  After watching Games of Thrones, makes me glad i was not born in those years.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    It's the foxbody of jets.

                    God bless.
                    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men -Frederick Douglass

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by ram57ta View Post
                      F4 is one of the most capable jet fighters the US military ever flew...it served in all branches in various roles and was still being used into the 90's...just because its old doesn't mean its not capable in certain roles.
                      I know a little about the F4's. My uncle flew one off of the USS Enterprise in the mid-'60's. I said "They", not "us". Support and parts availability are a lot different there than they are here.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Vertnut View Post
                        I know a little about the F4's. My uncle flew one off of the USS Enterprise in the mid-'60's. I said "They", not "us". Support and parts availability are a lot different there than they are here.
                        I was kind of wondering where they've been getting the parts for them since 1979.
                        "It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by helosailor View Post
                          I was kind of wondering where they've been getting the parts for them since 1979.
                          That was more my point.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            The F4 was one of my favorite Micro Machines planes

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              FYI,
                              The F-4E has an internal gun.

                              Most earlier models have the capability of carrying the gun pod.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X