Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prosecutors to pursue felony charges against ex-soldier for possessing high-capacity

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Prosecutors to pursue felony charges against ex-soldier for possessing high-capacity

    New York prosecutors will pursue felony criminal charges against retired special forces soldier Nathan Haddad, who was arrested in LeRay, New York in January for allegedly possessing five 30-round AR-15 magazines, according to conservative law blog Legal Insurrection.

    Prosecutors had reportedly offered Haddad a plea bargain that would spare him jail time if he admitted to five misdemeanors, according to Legal Insurrection. But Haddad’s attorney told the blog that Haddad, who currently works at the Department of Defense, will not accept the deal.

    It is unclear how Haddad was arrested or discovered with the magazines.

    Haddad was deployed four times during his ten-year Army career, and was once injured during special forces training in South Korea. He was discharged in October 2010.

    A website established to pay Haddad’s legal expenses has collected more than $35,000.

    In January, “Meet the Press” moderator David Gregory displayed a high-capacity magazine live on television, despite a warning from local police. But prosecutors in Washington, D.C. — where, unlike New York, the offense is merely a misdemeanor — declined to press charges. (RELATED OPINION: Apparently, gun laws don’t apply to David Gregory)

    I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

  • #2
    And so it begins. Fuck the NYS politicians.

    Comment


    • #3
      He should tell them:

      I will take the same punishment that the news anchor in D.C. got when he brought an illegal 30 round magazine on the set.

      Comment


      • #4
        If you are former military and breaking the law (even if it is a retarded law) you are still breaking the law. If he knowingly retained possession of them after the law went into effect he is guilty. I don't give a shit if he is cop ... still subject to the tyrannical New York government.
        Last edited by Pokulski-Blatz; 02-21-2013, 08:31 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Pokulski-Blatz View Post
          If you are former military and breaking the law (even if it is a retarded law) you are still breaking the law. If he knowingly retained possession of them after the law went into effect he is guilty. I don't give a shit if he is cop ... still subject to the tyrannical New Youk government.
          unfortunately this is true
          satisfaction is the death of desire...

          its still "We the people"...right?

          Comment


          • #6
            Until you fight the law to the SC. Taking the law lying down and accepting it is not the answer
            I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
              Until you fight the law to the SC. Taking the law lying down and accepting it is not the answer
              /agree

              Comment

              Working...
              X