Death of the 2nd amendment, the thread

[FATHERFORD]

Seems like the only real action is asking for support on the AWB and hi capacity mags.

Which I just don't see passing...

[Sean88gt]

Which I just don't see passing...

Maybe he looked at the economic benefit and just threw BS out there?

[Nash B.]

Which I just don't see passing...

You underestimate the stupidity of the masses as well as the massiveness of the stupidity.

[IHaveAMustang]

Just sad that no more FTF transactions can be done. That's what I loved about being in Texas. I have bought so many guns from a trunk, or sitting in the sellers passenger side seat.

A quick handshake and a thanks and walking away.

Guarantee if FTF requires a FFL now, FFL dealers will raise prices because they know they are necessary now.

[Sean88gt]

Just sad that no more FTF transactions can be done. That's what I loved about being in Texas. I have bought so many guns from a trunk, or sitting in the sellers passenger side seat.

A quick handshake and a thanks and walking away.

Guarantee if FTF requires a FFL now, FFL dealers will raise prices because they know they are necessary now.

It still has to go through legislation.

[talisman]

Just sad that no more FTF transactions can be done. That's what I loved about being in Texas. I have bought so many guns from a trunk, or sitting in the sellers passenger side seat.

A quick handshake and a thanks and walking away.

Guarantee if FTF requires a FFL now, FFL dealers will raise prices because they know they are necessary now.

They'll still be done with regularity, I'm sure.

[Nash B.]

I thought he said he'd urge Congress to pass a law requiring universal background checks. It's not in the list of 23 executive orders Matt posted.

[stevo]

You underestimate the stupidity of the masses as well as the massiveness of the stupidity.

It is funny how people have already forgot the current regime squeezed and squeezed and squeezed Democrats who opposed 0bamacare until they voted to support it.

Stevo

[bcoop]

It's all EO at this point, he won't get shit through congress.

EA =/= EO

allows doctors to question and report who owns weapons.

Could allow, not does allow. You're stating that as fact, and there is no supporting evidence that this is fact.

[stevo]

EA =/= EO



Could allow, not does allow. You're stating that as fact, and there is no supporting evidence that this is fact.

I said allow, not require.

16. Clarify that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes.

Stevo

[motoman]

More info on the proposal.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/120650415/White-House-list-of-executive-orders-on-gun-violence

[bcoop]

I said allow, not require.



Stevo

Once again, you're making assumptions. Just because they ask, doesn't mean they report it.

And face the truth. Some people ARE a danger to themselves and others, and NEED to be reported if they do have guns. Some people are batshit nuts, and many of them are on this board.

[Gtracer]

Once again, you're making assumptions. Just because they ask, doesn't mean they report it.

And face the truth. Some people ARE a danger to themselves and others, and NEED to be reported if they do have guns. Some people are batshit nuts, and many of them are on this board.

So, commiefornia seems to be the place for you

[IHaveAMustang]

I thought he said he'd urge Congress to pass a law requiring universal background checks. It's not in the list of 23 executive orders Matt posted.

Oh...then reading comprehension owns me.

Hopefully it will die on the floor.

[stevo]

Once again, you're making assumptions. Just because they ask, doesn't mean they report it.

And face the truth. Some people ARE a danger to themselves and others, and NEED to be reported if they do have guns. Some people are batshit nuts, and many of them are on this board.

I am not sure what you are trying to say, I didn't say some would, many would or all world, I said it ALLOWS them to do it. Before, they were NOT allowed to do it, now they ARE allowed to do it.You are attempting to read more into someone's comments just for the sake of arguing.

As for your second comment, the government is now changing what they consider being "mentally ill". If you read the current DSM-5, it will no longer be be required to use a set guideline of each mental illness to make a determination, only a vague opinion of a doctor. Someone who was considered to be out the norm in society, come March, will be able to be labeled as mentally ill. Come March, YOU can be lawfully classified mentally ill. How is that possible? Because you are not the typical sheeple that is more worried about American Idol, if a single doctor believes (and reports) it.

Stevo