Originally posted by Baron
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Texas officials about teachers: Arm them!
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by BlackSnake View PostHave you seen some of the shooting that goes on in a CHL class? lol I can pass it with my eyes closed. We had a woman that passed, after hitting the target next to hers. The shooting portion of the test is way too easy to pass IMO.
Add to that the percent of CHL holders that actually shoot on a regular basis. Many never shoot again until the are up to renew. Just so they can have the license.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm going a little rogue here since I don't want to fully read everything...
1. CHLs in school zones. I feel this should be allowed. Everyone thinks about when school is in session and uses those arguments. That's fine, but I still don't agree. Personally it affects me mostly because a lot of time I'm leaving some rough school campuses after midnight for my job - and do not have that option available to me. These campuses can be nasty after hours too.
2. The teacher carrying guns thing - I'd like to see a percentage of teacher volunteers be trained and be paid a bonus monthly. Sort of like Airborne in the US Army - they get jump pay. These teachers should have required training, briefings and NOT be pointed out or made known if at all possible. These teachers would be REQUIRED to have their weapon on them daily.
Granted there is money in the training and the bonuses - but it sure beat paying 2+ people 35K+ per year to stand around most of the time. Anyone ever been on these campuses that pay police to be there? They are not exactly productive, alert or even aware of their surroundings.
Leave a comment:
-
Have you seen some of the shooting that goes on in a CHL class? lol I can pass it with my eyes closed. We had a woman that passed, after hitting the target next to hers. The shooting portion of the test is way too easy to pass IMO.
Add to that the percent of CHL holders that actually shoot on a regular basis. Many never shoot again until the are up to renew. Just so they can have the license.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BlackSnake View PostI understand this, but what about the one time it does happen?
What about that mall shooting where the shooter decided to kill himself when a CHL holder aimed at him but didnt shoot due to the possibility of others getting hit? It stopped the masacre, simply because the shooter didnt want to risk not killing himself quickly and hurting/not dieing from a shot by someone else.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Baron View PostThe correlation you are mising is government building. Not allowed to carry in any government owned place or vehicle. Schools are generally ISD, but owned/funded by the state.
The bottom line is that extra training or not, if it isnt a gun free zone, there will be less of a chance of someone mentally ill using that place as a safe place to kill without opposition. The power is in the numbers, not the training. In a perfect world, just the threat of there being CHL holders will make them choose some other place, or simply to just off themself without taking others lives.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BlackSnake View PostThe ratio count isnt law. Its mine and others that share the same opinion. And there isnt a 1 and 20 ratio at Chuckecheese. You dont have one adult responsable for 20 kids there. I dont have a answer for daycare. Havent thought that one through.
The bottom line is that extra training or not, if it isnt a gun free zone, there will be less of a chance of someone mentally ill using that place as a safe place to kill without opposition. The power is in the numbers, not the training. In a perfect world, just the threat of there being CHL holders will make them choose some other place, or simply to just off themself without taking others lives.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Baron View PostInteresting. How do you explain that places like daycares and Chuckechese's that have a higher kid/adult ratio werent included in that law, if that was the case?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BlackSnake View PostI'm not sure that I can give you a answer that will suite you, but I'll try.
CHL's were allowed in almost all places but a few. One of those being a school. You first have to ask yourself why? Why are we banned from carrying in schools? Well, we are not. The way I understand the law is that if you work at a school, and the school board themselves votes us in, then at that time its allowed. But I do think its for workers of the school only.
We put these safety nets in place because some people like myself would like to see a higher qualified CHL holder in a situation that has a 20 to 1 ratio of child/adult. And I and others want our kids to be safe from ass hat killers and friendly fire as much as possable. A teacher has enough on their plates to guide 20 plus kids safely away from said gun fire. Then to add confronting a gunman in where they may end up in a shoot out is IMO putting too much for one serving. Without advanced or at least situational training, I think we are allowing for CHL holders to handle more than what they are trained to handle with just a simple CHL.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Baron View PostI still dont understand the difference between a CHL holder anywhere outside a school needing special training because they are in a school.
CHL's were allowed in almost all places but a few. One of those being a school. You first have to ask yourself why? Why are we banned from carrying in schools? Well, we are not. The way I understand the law is that if you work at a school, and the school board themselves votes us in, then at that time its allowed. But I do think its for workers of the school only.
We put these safety nets in place because some people like myself would like to see a higher qualified CHL holder in a situation that has a 20 to 1 ratio of child/adult. And I and others want our kids to be safe from ass hat killers and friendly fire as much as possable. A teacher has enough on their plates to guide 20 plus kids safely away from said gun fire. Then to add confronting a gunman in where they may end up in a shoot out is IMO putting too much for one serving. Without advanced or at least situational training, I think we are allowing for CHL holders to handle more than what they are trained to handle with just a simple CHL.
Leave a comment:
-
I still dont understand the difference between a CHL holder anywhere outside a school needing special training because they are in a school.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bubbaearl View Posthalf the teachers at my brides school are avid hunters . dont think they need training .
Just sayin. At least they are fimiliar with...guns.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kbscobravert View PostI would imagine they should go through a mandatory level of training and be licensed by the Texas Private Security Board. Heck it is a 40hr course for the level III and it is required in Texas for armed security. I am in no way expecting a teacher to be an armed security deterrent but I want them to have the right to carry and the knowledge to do so safely.
Leave a comment:
-
half the teachers at my brides school are avid hunters . dont think they need training .
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GhostTX View PostArm the teachers that want to be armed. Pay for the training. Done. Read the first article in the OP. Its already being done.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: