Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The U.N. does not like potheads

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The U.N. does not like potheads

    http://theintelhub.com/2012/11/29/he...arijuana-laws/

    The UN is going to piss off the Libs with this one. Which is a good thing. Maybe we will finally get everyone to hate them enough to get them out of here.

    The head of the United Nations drug watchdog agency, in a public call for a world governing body to influence the U.S. democratic process, has urged U.S. federal officials to challenge new marijuana laws passed by citizens in both Washington and Colorado.

    Raymond Yans, apparently oblivious to the U.S. Constitution, claimed the new laws send, “a wrong message to the rest of the nation and it sends a wrong message abroad.”

    Yans further attacked the voter approved measures by urging Attorney General Eric Holder to “take all necessary measures,” to strike down the laws.

    The fact that anyone in the United Nations feels comfortable openly telling the U.S. government to go against the will of their people just goes to show how far and strong globalism has become.

    In a report published on Natural News, writer J. D. Heyes noted this bold and public attack on the American democratic process.

    “Likely empowered by a U.S. administration that favors the kind of nanny state politics a ruling global entity would no doubt embrace, the head of the United Nations’ International Narcotics Control Board feels comfortable telling federal officials they should move to challenge measures in Colorado and Washington that decriminalize possession of small amounts of marijuana for adults 21 and over.

    Raymond Yans lectured the voter-approved measures – part of the United States’ democratic process, something most UN member countries are not familiar with – send “a wrong message to the rest of the nation and it sends a wrong message abroad.”

    In the United States, the drug war has been an absolute failure.

    Thankfully, states like Washington and Colorado, and, perhaps more importantly, all the states that have legalized medical marijuana, are taking steps in the right direction that are now predictably being attacked by the very organizations and power structures that initiated the war on drugs in the first place.

    The idea that any logical person could consider marijuana in the same league as drugs such as heroin and cocaine is absolutely ludicrous and, frankly, anti science.

    For their part, the United Nations publicly supports vaccinating the world, genetically modified foods, eugenics, gun control, and, as highlighted by these recent threats, the ongoing and failed drug war.

    Just as two American states have taken a huge step forward in the fight for marijuana decriminalization, this very same globalist entity, completely ignoring the CIA opium trade, attacks them.

    The fact that this un-American globalist thinks that the United Nations should supersede the American public is once again a stark reminder that the globalist plan for a one world order is indeed upon us.

  • #2
    The train really came off the tracks in those last three sentences!
    ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

    Comment


    • #3
      Fuuuuuck the U.N.
      Where's all the money they owe us?
      "It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Yale View Post
        The train really came off the tracks in those last three sentences!

        Ya, it was like the author just kept saying the same thing in slightly different ways.

        In fact, it was as if he was just trying to get the same point across using different words.

        I think the redundant and repetive redundancy is very repetitive, and really just seems like a broken record.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by jluv View Post
          Ya, it was like the author just kept saying the same thing in slightly different ways.

          In fact, it was as if he was just trying to get the same point across using different words.

          I think the redundant and repetive redundancy is very repetitive, and really just seems like a broken record.
          Maybe he works for the..
          "It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by jluv View Post
            Ya, it was like the author just kept saying the same thing in slightly different ways.

            In fact, it was as if he was just trying to get the same point across using different words.

            I think the redundant and repetive redundancy is very repetitive, and really just seems like a broken record.
            I see what you did there...
            Originally posted by Sean88gt
            You can take white off the list. White on anything is the best, including vehicles, women, and the Presidency.
            Originally posted by Baron Von Crowder
            You can not imagine how difficult it is to hold a half gallon of moo juice and polish the one-eyed gopher when your doin' seventy-five in an eighteen-wheeler.

            Comment


            • #7
              Good, the feeling is mutual. They can go piss up a flag pole.

              Comment


              • #8
                __
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • #9
                  Those blue helmets do make really good targets haha.
                  2004 Suzuki DL650
                  1996 Hy-Tek Hurricane 103

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Occasionally, I listen to 90.1, Freedom Radio Network (?), when I'm bored with what's on AM590, and the only reason this doesn't sound 100% like Alex Jones is the absence of the term "eugenics". Same mind set.

                    GTFO UN
                    Ronald Reagan:"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it."

                    Homer: "Bart...there's 2 things I know about women. Never give them nicknames like "jumbo" or "boxcar" and always keep receipts...it makes you look like a business man."

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Just to be clear. Weed still good, yes?
                      THE BAD HOMBRE

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Treat it just like alcohol; it's not going to change who smokes, or who drinks.

                        EDIT: Let me walk that back a bit. High school kids get older friends, or use fake ID's to purchase alcohol, and I'm sure the same would happen with pot. I'm not comfortable with the same amount of kids smoking pot as are drinking, that would be my primary concern. I'm not advocating teens drinking, but me & all my friends did our fair share. Had we been equally exposed to pot, things might be different today. I doubt it, but who knows.
                        Last edited by barronj; 12-01-2012, 07:10 AM.
                        Ronald Reagan:"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it."

                        Homer: "Bart...there's 2 things I know about women. Never give them nicknames like "jumbo" or "boxcar" and always keep receipts...it makes you look like a business man."

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by barronj View Post
                          Treat it just like alcohol; it's not going to change who smokes, or who drinks.
                          With you on this, personally I could care less if it was legal or illegal. Never really been into it. But there is a lot of revenue that can be generated by taxing it.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by barronj View Post
                            Treat it just like alcohol; it's not going to change who smokes, or who drinks.

                            EDIT: Let me walk that back a bit. High school kids get older friends, or use fake ID's to purchase alcohol, and I'm sure the same would happen with pot. I'm not comfortable with the same amount of kids smoking pot as are drinking, that would be my primary concern. I'm not advocating teens drinking, but me & all my friends did our fair share. Had we been equally exposed to pot, things might be different today. I doubt it, but who knows.
                            pot is not worse than alcohol.
                            ازدهار رأسه برعشيت

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by DallasSleeper View Post
                              With you on this, personally I could care less if it was legal or illegal. Never really been into it. But there is a lot of revenue that can be generated by taxing it.
                              and not just for smoking it, think of all the hemp products!
                              ازدهار رأسه برعشيت

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X