There are several articles on this one page, a succession if you will. They allude to a General trying to disobey orders on the night of the attack, then being relieved of command after having done so.
My question is this: Given that it would have been an order to engage, was there likely a second in command that heard the stand down order and interfered in it's implementation? Seems hard to believe that he would try and help and be unsuccessful as the fight was ongoing when this would have occurred...
Any of you guys have insight into how that could have played out? It certainly seems plausible that they would yank someone who tried to do the right thing, in contradiction to the current administrations lack of want to do so...
My question is this: Given that it would have been an order to engage, was there likely a second in command that heard the stand down order and interfered in it's implementation? Seems hard to believe that he would try and help and be unsuccessful as the fight was ongoing when this would have occurred...
Any of you guys have insight into how that could have played out? It certainly seems plausible that they would yank someone who tried to do the right thing, in contradiction to the current administrations lack of want to do so...
Comment