How Mitt Romney cheated his way to the GOP nomination

[Forever_frost]

7 Democrats..........7 Republicans from 1929 until today. Even, if you ask me.
A very real cross section of American voting. Democracy at work.

I said liberals. Not Republican or Democrat. Big government, big spending liberals. Or statists if you prefer

[cyclonescott]

Is this the America YOU want? WOW

Apparently it is. But but Romney won get over it. All the while ignoring the facts that it was won through deceptive means. Frost and others here don’t get it, but if Obama wins through obvious fraudulent means they will scream and cry and roll around on the ground like a 2 year old and claim how unfair it was or it will just be the Paul bots fault.

[Geor!]

Apparently it is. But but Romney won get over it. All the while ignoring the facts that it was won through deceptive means. Frost and others here don’t get it, but if Obama wins through obvious fraudulent means they will scream and cry and roll around on the ground like a 2 year old and claim how unfair it was or it will just be the Paul bots fault.

It wasn't won under fraudulent means. Ron Paul was never going to win, neither was anybody else. They weren't going to go to the floor without a decisive nominee either. Here, have this rat poison; I just heard Ron Paul took some.

[Forever_frost]

Apparently it is. But but Romney won get over it. All the while ignoring the facts that it was won through deceptive means. Frost and others here don’t get it, but if Obama wins through obvious fraudulent means they will scream and cry and roll around on the ground like a 2 year old and claim how unfair it was or it will just be the Paul bots fault.

Tell me, what office is Ron Paul running for this November.

[likeitfast55]

I said liberals. Not Republican or Democrat. Big government, big spending liberals. Or statists if you prefer

Liberals, is that the opposite of right wing wacko's?

I looked Frost, I just can't seem to find the "Liberal" party anywhere in the history books. What books do you get your facts from? The Fox news edition?

[Geor!]

Liberals, is that the opposite of right wing wacko's?

I looked Frost, I just can't seem to find the "Liberal" party anywhere in the history books. What books do you get your facts from? The Fox news edition?

They have been calling themselves liberals for decades, though the term "progressive" is coming back into fashion now.

Teach yourself something, if your dumbass can even comprehend above a fifth grade level.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_liberalism_in_the_United_States

[likeitfast55]

I said liberals. Not Republican or Democrat. Big government, big spending liberals. Or statists if you prefer

Oh, ok like Pres. Bush had, 6 count them 6 of his 8 years in office! And still the economy was in shambles!

"WASHINGTON — President Bush on Wednesday signed a multibillion-dollar economic rescue package on Wednesday"

Remember this? Is the Big spending you are talking about?

[likeitfast55]

They have been calling themselves liberals for decades, though the term "progressive" is coming back into fashion now.

Teach yourself something, if your dumbass can even comprehend above a fifth grade level.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_..._United_States

When you name call it a forgone conclusion the argument is lost. By the way it was sarcasm if you did not get it, I understand.

Guaranteed, I have a higher education that you.

I at least GRADUATED from sixth grade.(note for "Geor" this is sarcasm also)

[Vertnut]

Oh, ok like Pres. Bush had, 6 count them 6 of his 8 years in office! And still the economy was in shambles!

"WASHINGTON — President Bush on Wednesday signed a multibillion-dollar economic rescue package on Wednesday"

Remember this? Is the Big spending you are talking about?

Bush spent 4 trillion in 8 years, which was horrible. Barry spent 6 trillion in 4 years, or 300% more. Which do you prefer?

This entire thread is idiotic and pointless.

[likeitfast55]

I prefer neither Pres. Obama or Previous Pres. Bush.

In defense of Pres Bush, I did vote for him the first time, because Al Gore was a no go for me.


"This entire thread is idiotic and pointless." Agreed , I try to stay out of these political spitball contests on this type of format because all it does is make both

sides look bat shit crazy.

[Forever_frost]

Liberals, is that the opposite of right wing wacko's?

I looked Frost, I just can't seem to find the "Liberal" party anywhere in the history books. What books do you get your facts from? The Fox news edition?

Liberal. Statists. Those who view big government as the answer and see the Constitution as flexible and interpretable.

stat·ism (sttzm)
n.
The practice or doctrine of giving a centralized government control over economic planning and policy.

[Forever_frost]

Oh, ok like Pres. Bush had, 6 count them 6 of his 8 years in office! And still the economy was in shambles!

"WASHINGTON — President Bush on Wednesday signed a multibillion-dollar economic rescue package on Wednesday"

Remember this? Is the Big spending you are talking about?

You mean the 4-6% unemployment rating that that evil Bush had with Republican control?

[Vertnut]

I prefer neither Pres. Obama or Previous Pres. Bush.

In defense of Pres Bush, I did vote for him the first time, because Al Gore was a no go for me.

You compared the two based on spending. I showed that there's really no comparison.

[Geor!]

When you name call it a forgone conclusion the argument is lost.

Guaranteed, I have a higher education that you.

I at least GRADUATED from sixth grade.

Oh, I'm not really trying to interject myself in the argument between you two, I'm just calling out a dumbass post when I see it.

Nice to see that higher education taught you the difference of forgo/forego.

[likeitfast55]

You compared the two based on spending. I showed that there's really no comparison.

I did not compare anything. I simply pointed out that a previous President (GOP)

started the ball rolling down hill.

President Obama, in my opinion should have tried to stop that ball. Instead he

made it bigger. Poor move for the country.

Not what we needed at the time.