Paulbots at it again

[cyclonescott]

Yep, sure he lost. He didn't even get 1% of the vote in TEXAS. He lost, he surrendered and even his son is going for Romney.

Again you are believing what the GOP and media tell you. Voting machines are easy to rig and you are still not acknowledging the corruption and fraud that is blatantly taking place. If Romney is such a sure in then why did they have to go to such lengths?

[cyclonescott]

Sorry, was trying to handle my kiddo when I typed that. Why is it he ran as a Republican when he's not? He is a libertarian. He will tell you that to your face. He just wanted the votes from R's that L's can't pull

And I could show you in your own words that you are a Paul supporter. You just don’t want to admit it.

[Forever_frost]

Again you are believing what the GOP and media tell you. Voting machines are easy to rig and you are still not acknowledging the corruption and fraud that is blatantly taking place. If Romney is such a sure in then why did they have to go to such lengths?

Right, so the voting machines were wrong, the pure numbers at the conventions were wrong, hell, the count in Texas was wrong as well. Where do you get YOUR numbers?

And no, I'm not a Paul supporter (well, maybe Rand.) I agree with some of his policies. However his Paulbots ensure I'm no Paul supporter.

[EW]

If you are not voting for Romney, you are voting for Obama. PERIOD! A third party vote gets Obama elected. Do Ron Paul supporters really want that? Dumb. Ron Paul should tell his people to wake up.

[Vertnut]

If you are not voting for Romney, you are voting for Obama. PERIOD! A third party vote gets Obama elected. Do Ron Paul supporters really want that? Dumb. Ron Paul should tell his people to wake up.

His ego won't let him do it. Even his own son supports Romney vs. Barry.

[woodstock]

His conscience won't let him do it. Even his own son supports Romney vs. Barry.

I fixed it for you.

Rand is a republican not a libertarian, he has made this plainly clear of course he's going to support Romney. I'm sure it won't hurt his political career either.

[Vertnut]

I fixed it for you.

Rand is a republican not a libertarian, he has made this plainly clear of course he's going to support Romney. I'm sure it won't hurt his political career either.

I meant ego. He's still a life-long politician who has wanted term limits(?).

[woodstock]

Ya I'm sure you did. Somehow I don't see RP as having a huge ego. I just don't think he wants to go against everything he has stood for his whole life.

It's not like he has been a congressman for 30 years straight. He has gone back and forth between his medical practice. And he didn't just appoint himself to congress. Maybe he wants term limits because the reason the main policies that determine this countries direction never change is because the politicians never change. Either way he is certainly not the only person to spend the majority of their lives in politics, at least he admits there is a problem with that. But then again nothing will change until the mindset of the American people change and decide they don't want life-long politicians.

[EW]

But then again nothing will change until the mindset of the American people change and decide they don't want life-long politicians.

AND free handouts from the tax payers.