Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Don't ask Don't Tell is dead...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SlowLX
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    In the infantry, we have unscented baby wipes
    Me too but I was good at finding things in the field so a bottle of water for a luxurious field shower ain't no big deal.

    Leave a comment:


  • SlowLX
    replied
    Originally posted by ceyko View Post
    Ever been to NTC, Iraq, Afghanistan? Some nice camps in later two places, but a lot of open showers and crappers - NTC as well.
    The handful of times I got a real shower in fallujah it was in a shower trailer which had private stalls. On my op we made our own private area for water bottle showers and This was almost 6 years ago. I agree with dadt however you guys could be using better arguments than I don't want a queer staring at me when that only applies to one branch on a more than occasional basis.
    Last edited by SlowLX; 12-27-2010, 07:09 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Originally posted by SlowLX View Post
    A) you're old, even the majority of marine grunts have barracks with private showers now
    B) I don't know about the rangers but when marine arty goes to the field our showers consist of a bottle or two of water every week or so.
    The only place I'd concede on the group shower argument is the navy but they're all Peter puffers anyways.
    In the infantry, we have unscented baby wipes

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Just in case you want to read the report for yourself



    I don't need game, I'm retired.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    We do not recommend segregated housing for gay or lesbian Service members.
    We believe this would do more harm than good for unit cohesion, create a climate of
    stigmatization and isolation, and be impossible to enforce or administer unless Service
    members are required to disclose their sexual orientation. On the other hand, we are
    sensitive to concerns expressed to us by commanders that disputes may arise between gay
    and straight Service members assigned to live together involving, at least to some extent,
    sexual orientation. Commanders should have the flexibility, on a case-by-case basis, to
    addresses those concerns in the interests of maintaining morale, good order, and discipline.

    Here again, we are convinced that separate bathroom facilities would do more harm
    than good to unit cohesion and would be impracticable to administer and enforce. Concerns
    about showers and bathrooms are based on a stereotype—that gay men and lesbians will
    behave in an inappropriate or predatory manner in these situations. As one gay former
    Service member told us, to fit in, co-exist, and conform to social norms, gay men have
    learned to avoid making heterosexuals feel uncomfortable or threatened in situation such
    as this. The reality is that people of different sexual orientation use shower and bathroom
    facilities together every day in hundreds of thousands of college dorms, college and high
    school gyms, professional sports locker rooms, police and fire stations, and athletic clubs.
    Accordingly, we recommend the Department of Defense expressly prohibit the
    designation of separate facilities based on sexual orientation, except that commanders
    retain the authority to adjudicate requests for accommodation of privacy concerns on an
    individualized, case-by-case basis in the interest of maintaining morale, good order, and
    discipline, and consistent with performance of mission. It should also be recognized that
    commanders already have the tools—from counseling, to non-judicial punishment, to
    UCMJ prosecution—to deal with misbehavior in both living quarters and bathing situations,
    whether the person who engages in the misconduct is gay or straight.

    Release from Service Commitments
    Some Service members told us they would seek to be released from their service
    commitments if Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell were repealed, based on their opposition to gay men
    and lesbians in the military or to homosexuality in general. We recommend against a policy
    allowing release from service commitments and voluntary discharge of Service members
    based on opposition to living or serving with gay or lesbian Service members after a repeal
    of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. The U.S. military is an all-volunteer force, but once Service members
    join the Military Services, they are not guaranteed a certain legal or policy landscape for
    the duration of their commitment.393 At present, Service members serve alongside others of
    different backgrounds, beliefs, races, and religions, reflective of American society as a whole.
    This already includes gay men and lesbians, and most Service members recognize that. It
    would be inappropriate, unworkable, and unfair to others to adopt a policy that permits
    release based on an assertion of incompatibility with or intolerance for gay men and lesbians.
    Under existing regulations, Service members may request to be voluntarily discharged under
    a military department secretary’s plenary authority. The military department Secretary
    has the discretion whether to grant such requests, and only after determining the early
    separation to be in the best interest of the Service. Such discretionary discharges should
    only be permitted when they meet the standard of being in the best interest of the Service.

    Leave a comment:


  • 564826
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    if a gay man can shower with a straight man, why can't I shower with that hot MP chick with big tits? Same thing, right?
    That's an easy one, that's because you don't have game!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • davbrucas
    replied
    Lawsuits will surely be filed...what a great big cluster-fuck.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Originally posted by Yale View Post
    If I were, It would've been common knowledge on here a long time ago. The reason I'm passionate is, my Dad is gay. We can have a whole other discussion about that if you want to, but it will make this thread pretty messy, and I think you're just stirring the pot anyway.


    I hadn't considered married gays. Ultimately, congress could vote to legalize gay marriage nationally, which may happen, or the Supreme Court may get involved. I think this repeal will end up pushing that national dialogue a lot further than a lot of folks expected it to go in the near future.


    I think you'll see the same number of gays checking out straights as you see now. You and I can't control who looks at us, and how. Once more, the gays that let it get in the way of their job won't likely last too long. I said earlier that the straight troops that are uncomfortable with it should be given the option of honorable discharge.

    The DoD already said this isn't an option. According to the report that they filed, no new barracks or showers were to be created, allowing service members who disagree with homosexuality to leave would not be permitted, basically, everyone would have to suck it up. However the question should be, if a gay man can shower with a straight man, why can't I shower with that hot MP chick with big tits? Same thing, right?

    Leave a comment:


  • davbrucas
    replied
    LOL...showers were overrated anyway. A bottle of water to wash your cock, your ass and your armpits.

    Leave a comment:


  • SlowLX
    replied
    Originally posted by davbrucas View Post
    Yeah, you REMF'ers had it pretty easy.
    A) you're old, even the majority of marine grunts have barracks with private showers now
    B) I don't know about the rangers but when marine arty goes to the field our showers consist of a bottle or two of water every week or so.
    The only place I'd concede on the group shower argument is the navy but they're all Peter puffers anyways.

    Leave a comment:


  • davbrucas
    replied
    Originally posted by Yale View Post
    You win this round, Trebek, lmao! I think I'm out on the rest of this thread.
    Dont leave...threads are no fun when everyone agrees.

    Leave a comment:


  • GSRGuy94
    replied
    Originally posted by StanleyTweedle View Post
    I take it you don't believe in "majority rules" either? Cause you know, gays only actually represent 3% of the total US population. You know, people with such views actually disgust me more than the gays. No offense intended though.
    Majority does rule, to an extent. But just because there are more of one type of person than another, doesn't necessarily mean that;

    1) The majority has the right to shit all over the other groups.
    2) Everybody in that majority of people feels the same way.

    Leave a comment:


  • YALE
    replied
    Originally posted by davbrucas View Post
    Ouch...yup. Just instigating interesting conversation. I guess you call yourself Yale because Turd was already taken? :biggrin:
    You win this round, Trebek, lmao! I think I'm out on the rest of this thread.

    Leave a comment:


  • ceyko
    replied
    Ever been to NTC, Iraq, Afghanistan? Some nice camps in later two places, but a lot of open showers and crappers - NTC as well.
    Last edited by ceyko; 12-27-2010, 06:12 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • davbrucas
    replied
    Originally posted by SlowLX View Post
    I Dunno about most of fawkers but outside of bootcamp and the occasional temporary housing I had a private shitter / shower shared by 2 other people.
    Yeah, you REMF'ers had it pretty easy.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X