Nope. There are certain types of people that all people won't be friends with. You have preferences on people that you won't be friends with as well, I'm sure. I won't be friends with a liberal, because I feel that they are small minded people who let emotion blind them, and act like spoiled, entitled, bratty kids. I won't be friends with active drug users, though I'll make a small exception for marijuana because through my own little research I'm of the opinion that its not any worse for you than alcohol or cigarettes. I don't smoke it myself though, and won't tolerate it being smoked around me. Sorry man, but this is what liberals don't understand. You can't like someone that you don't respect. And I just don't have any respect for these people.
That's funny, because my best friend is a right-wing conservative Republican. Her dad was a Baptist pastor (we all went to the same church), her uncle was the Vice President of the Southern Baptist convention, her family was good friends with Jerry Falwell, etc. But we both understand that neither of us is right 100% of the time. Which is something that it seems a few people don't get.
Nope. There are certain types of people that all people won't be friends with. You have preferences on people that you won't be friends with as well, I'm sure. I won't be friends with a liberal, because I feel that they are small minded people who let emotion blind them, and act like spoiled, entitled, bratty kids. I won't be friends with active drug users, though I'll make a small exception for marijuana because through my own little research I'm of the opinion that its not any worse for you than alcohol or cigarettes. I don't smoke it myself though, and won't tolerate it being smoked around me. Sorry man, but this is what liberals don't understand. You can't like someone that you don't respect. And I just don't have any respect for these people.
You are a walking contradiction
Leave a comment:
Guest replied
Comparing 2 consenting adults to 1 consenting adult and _________(anything other than a consenting adult) is a seriously weak arguement.
Also, the point I was making is now those effective leaders MAY lose their effectiveness because they can admit what their preferences are and hell - they can even prance around if they want.
Understand that you're also dealing with 17-22 year old kids who make up a huge portion of our military. You may have been a prodigy at that age, but most are just set in their ways and idiots. (I certainly was, more so then I am now. )
My point is at 33 y/o I'm not going to ever respect a cock gobbler like I would a standard male heterosexual. I have to tolerate gay males in society, I don't have to respect them. It could be hard for young kids to even tolerate them.
Nope. There are certain types of people that all people won't be friends with. You have preferences on people that you won't be friends with as well, I'm sure. I won't be friends with a liberal, because I feel that they are small minded people who let emotion blind them, and act like spoiled, entitled, bratty kids. I won't be friends with active drug users, though I'll make a small exception for marijuana because through my own little research I'm of the opinion that its not any worse for you than alcohol or cigarettes. I don't smoke it myself though, and won't tolerate it being smoked around me. Sorry man, but this is what liberals don't understand. You can't like someone that you don't respect. And I just don't have any respect for these people.
I consider two consenting adults different than a adult abusing a child but its obvious you and vertnut disagree. Whats even scarier is that you guys know what that nambla thing is. That is some sick shit!
Honestly what it boils down to, is that you believe what you believe is right and wont consider anyone elses opinion. Im reminded of close friends that served in vietnam and still believe blacks shouldnt be allowed to serve. Im sure with the next generation, this wont even be an after thought.
Race and sexual preference should not be compared. NAMBLA has been an issue for many years, because it's a "protected" organization by liberals.
Oh, I agree Lason. However if you're going to allow some deviants to be allowed in the military, you should allow all sexual deviants to be open about it. Afterall, aren't pedophiles, people who engage in beastiality and incest people as well and isn't their sexuality just who they are? If it's who they are, it can't be changed and should be accepted with open arms.
Right? Bleeding heart libs want to go on the offensive here and tell me that some deviance should be accepted but not others?
It is the same thing. NAMBLA believes it's okay to have sex with consenting children. It's a sexual deviance that you don't agree with so that makes it wrong? Why don't you support their right to express their natural born sexual preference? You're not pedophobic are you?
I consider two consenting adults different than a adult abusing a child but its obvious you and vertnut disagree. Whats even scarier is that you guys know what that nambla thing is. That is some sick shit!
Honestly what it boils down to, is that you believe what you believe is right and wont consider anyone elses opinion. Im reminded of close friends that served in vietnam and still believe blacks shouldnt be allowed to serve. Im sure with the next generation, this wont even be an after thought.
It is the same thing. NAMBLA believes it's okay to have sex with consenting children. It's a sexual deviance that you don't agree with so that makes it wrong? Why don't you support their right to express their natural born sexual preference? You're not pedophobic are you?
Oh, I agree Lason. However if you're going to allow some deviants to be allowed in the military, you should allow all sexual deviants to be open about it. Afterall, aren't pedophiles, people who engage in beastiality and incest people as well and isn't their sexuality just who they are? If it's who they are, it can't be changed and should be accepted with open arms.
Right? Bleeding heart libs want to go on the offensive here and tell me that some deviance should be accepted but not others?
Well you are right, it is against the UCMJ so I guess they would have to lift that article. But I wouldnt say biggot, if they lift it then that means active soldiers will be able to stick it in hookers butt's and talk about it in the shower right?
Leave a comment: