Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Don't ask Don't Tell is dead...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SMEGMA STENCH
    replied
    Originally posted by Lason View Post
    You are a walking contradiction
    I'd have to disagree, as I've already stated I'm not a liberal. Sorry.

    Leave a comment:


  • davbrucas
    replied
    Notice the uniform...it has been well known that these guys are fags anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • GSRGuy94
    replied
    Originally posted by StanleyTweedle View Post
    Nope. There are certain types of people that all people won't be friends with. You have preferences on people that you won't be friends with as well, I'm sure. I won't be friends with a liberal, because I feel that they are small minded people who let emotion blind them, and act like spoiled, entitled, bratty kids. I won't be friends with active drug users, though I'll make a small exception for marijuana because through my own little research I'm of the opinion that its not any worse for you than alcohol or cigarettes. I don't smoke it myself though, and won't tolerate it being smoked around me. Sorry man, but this is what liberals don't understand. You can't like someone that you don't respect. And I just don't have any respect for these people.
    That's funny, because my best friend is a right-wing conservative Republican. Her dad was a Baptist pastor (we all went to the same church), her uncle was the Vice President of the Southern Baptist convention, her family was good friends with Jerry Falwell, etc. But we both understand that neither of us is right 100% of the time. Which is something that it seems a few people don't get.
    Originally posted by Lason View Post
    You are a walking contradiction
    I'm glad I'm not the only person that sees that...

    Leave a comment:


  • Lason
    replied
    Originally posted by StanleyTweedle View Post
    Nope. There are certain types of people that all people won't be friends with. You have preferences on people that you won't be friends with as well, I'm sure. I won't be friends with a liberal, because I feel that they are small minded people who let emotion blind them, and act like spoiled, entitled, bratty kids. I won't be friends with active drug users, though I'll make a small exception for marijuana because through my own little research I'm of the opinion that its not any worse for you than alcohol or cigarettes. I don't smoke it myself though, and won't tolerate it being smoked around me. Sorry man, but this is what liberals don't understand. You can't like someone that you don't respect. And I just don't have any respect for these people.
    You are a walking contradiction

    Leave a comment:


  • talisman
    Guest replied
    Comparing 2 consenting adults to 1 consenting adult and _________(anything other than a consenting adult) is a seriously weak arguement.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vertnut
    replied
    Originally posted by Lason View Post
    No, your right but Im actually comparing soldiers of different generations and their views. Insert sexual preference, race, etc into it.
    Gotcha.

    Leave a comment:


  • SMEGMA STENCH
    replied
    Originally posted by ceyko View Post
    Also, the point I was making is now those effective leaders MAY lose their effectiveness because they can admit what their preferences are and hell - they can even prance around if they want.

    Understand that you're also dealing with 17-22 year old kids who make up a huge portion of our military. You may have been a prodigy at that age, but most are just set in their ways and idiots. (I certainly was, more so then I am now. )

    My point is at 33 y/o I'm not going to ever respect a cock gobbler like I would a standard male heterosexual. I have to tolerate gay males in society, I don't have to respect them. It could be hard for young kids to even tolerate them.
    A valid point. Well said.

    Originally posted by GSRGuy94 View Post
    So none of ya'll have gay friends?
    Nope. There are certain types of people that all people won't be friends with. You have preferences on people that you won't be friends with as well, I'm sure. I won't be friends with a liberal, because I feel that they are small minded people who let emotion blind them, and act like spoiled, entitled, bratty kids. I won't be friends with active drug users, though I'll make a small exception for marijuana because through my own little research I'm of the opinion that its not any worse for you than alcohol or cigarettes. I don't smoke it myself though, and won't tolerate it being smoked around me. Sorry man, but this is what liberals don't understand. You can't like someone that you don't respect. And I just don't have any respect for these people.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lason
    replied
    Originally posted by Vertnut View Post
    Race and sexual preference should not be compared.
    No, your right but Im actually comparing soldiers of different generations and their views. Insert sexual preference, race, etc into it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vertnut
    replied
    Originally posted by Lason View Post
    I consider two consenting adults different than a adult abusing a child but its obvious you and vertnut disagree. Whats even scarier is that you guys know what that nambla thing is. That is some sick shit!

    Honestly what it boils down to, is that you believe what you believe is right and wont consider anyone elses opinion. Im reminded of close friends that served in vietnam and still believe blacks shouldnt be allowed to serve. Im sure with the next generation, this wont even be an after thought.
    Race and sexual preference should not be compared. NAMBLA has been an issue for many years, because it's a "protected" organization by liberals.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lason
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    Oh, I agree Lason. However if you're going to allow some deviants to be allowed in the military, you should allow all sexual deviants to be open about it. Afterall, aren't pedophiles, people who engage in beastiality and incest people as well and isn't their sexuality just who they are? If it's who they are, it can't be changed and should be accepted with open arms.

    Right? Bleeding heart libs want to go on the offensive here and tell me that some deviance should be accepted but not others?
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    It is the same thing. NAMBLA believes it's okay to have sex with consenting children. It's a sexual deviance that you don't agree with so that makes it wrong? Why don't you support their right to express their natural born sexual preference? You're not pedophobic are you?

    I consider two consenting adults different than a adult abusing a child but its obvious you and vertnut disagree. Whats even scarier is that you guys know what that nambla thing is. That is some sick shit!

    Honestly what it boils down to, is that you believe what you believe is right and wont consider anyone elses opinion. Im reminded of close friends that served in vietnam and still believe blacks shouldnt be allowed to serve. Im sure with the next generation, this wont even be an after thought.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    It is the same thing. NAMBLA believes it's okay to have sex with consenting children. It's a sexual deviance that you don't agree with so that makes it wrong? Why don't you support their right to express their natural born sexual preference? You're not pedophobic are you?

    Leave a comment:


  • Vertnut
    replied
    Originally posted by GSRGuy94 View Post
    I think it's hilarious that you're comparing having sex with another grown man, to having sex with small children.
    NAMBLA feels that way, and it's run by gay men?

    Leave a comment:


  • GSRGuy94
    replied
    I think it's hilarious that you're comparing having sex with another grown man, to having sex with small children.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Oh, I agree Lason. However if you're going to allow some deviants to be allowed in the military, you should allow all sexual deviants to be open about it. Afterall, aren't pedophiles, people who engage in beastiality and incest people as well and isn't their sexuality just who they are? If it's who they are, it can't be changed and should be accepted with open arms.

    Right? Bleeding heart libs want to go on the offensive here and tell me that some deviance should be accepted but not others?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lason
    replied
    Well you are right, it is against the UCMJ so I guess they would have to lift that article. But I wouldnt say biggot, if they lift it then that means active soldiers will be able to stick it in hookers butt's and talk about it in the shower right?

    Stop looking at the glass as half empty!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X