Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Update on Hasan

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ceyko
    replied
    Originally posted by racrguy View Post
    It's still a protected class.

    So the Civil Rights act of 1964 doesn't exist? You're wrong, again.


    Almost any religion followed as fundamentally as some muslims follow islam exempts a person from the liability of killing someone.


    You guys are misinterpreting what I'm saying. I'm not saying I agree with Hasan's shenanigans, all I'm saying is that religion is a protected class
    1. In real life that is not the case.
    2. Killing vs murder are two different things.
    3. Your stirring up shit by splitting hairs with the person who made the post.

    This will be my last post to you, since I know you have all the time in the world to argue.

    Leave a comment:


  • DON SVO
    replied
    Let him have his beard all the way onto the table for his lethal injection.

    Leave a comment:


  • racrguy
    replied
    Originally posted by ceyko View Post
    ...for the record, having Roman-Catholic on my old dog tags - I would've been in a bad kind of way jacking around like that for a court marshal. Even if it was just a court marshal for smacking around some MPs being drunk or something.

    I don't know of any soldier that would get away with jacking around the way this piss ant has done.
    It's still a protected class.
    Originally posted by Vertnut View Post
    Wrong. Again.
    So the Civil Rights act of 1964 doesn't exist? You're wrong, again.
    Originally posted by line-em-up View Post
    Except for the fact that most sane religions don't exempt them from the liability of killing someone.
    Almost any religion followed as fundamentally as some muslims follow islam exempts a person from the liability of killing someone.


    You guys are misinterpreting what I'm saying. I'm not saying I agree with Hasan's shenanigans, all I'm saying is that religion is a protected class

    Leave a comment:


  • Vertnut
    replied
    Originally posted by line-em-up View Post
    Except for the fact that most sane religions don't exempt them from the liability of killing someone.
    Exactly.

    Leave a comment:


  • line-em-up
    replied
    Originally posted by racrguy View Post
    So is every other religious stance, get off your high horse.
    Except for the fact that most sane religions don't exempt them from the liability of killing someone.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vertnut
    replied
    Originally posted by racrguy View Post
    So is every other religious stance, get off your high horse.
    Wrong. Again.

    Leave a comment:


  • ceyko
    replied
    Originally posted by racrguy View Post
    So is every other religious stance, get off your high horse.
    ...for the record, having Roman-Catholic on my old dog tags - I would've been in a bad kind of way jacking around like that for a court marshal. Even if it was just a court marshal for smacking around some MPs being drunk or something.

    I don't know of any soldier that would get away with jacking around the way this piss ant has done.

    Leave a comment:


  • racrguy
    replied
    Originally posted by onemeangixxer7502 View Post
    just fucking preposterous that they fuck with us like that and now they're a protected class. Fuck them all in the ass with pig dick!
    So is every other religious stance, get off your high horse.

    Leave a comment:


  • onemeangixxer7502
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    This was a workplace violence incident and thus have to be treated as such. Can't have the world thinking we're hard on Muslims.
    just fucking preposterous that they fuck with us like that and now they're a protected class. Fuck them all in the ass with pig dick!

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Originally posted by kbscobravert View Post
    Am I the only one failing to see the issue here? They have eye witness that says "yes that light brown fucker shot me and those that were around me that are now dead". They have the female cop that shot him in his dick and now gets to shit in a bag for the rest of his life as proof and testimony.

    Get the trial started and lets hang this fucker already.
    This was a workplace violence incident and thus have to be treated as such. Can't have the world thinking we're hard on Muslims.

    Leave a comment:


  • KBScobravert
    replied
    Am I the only one failing to see the issue here? They have eye witness that says "yes that light brown fucker shot me and those that were around me that are now dead". They have the female cop that shot him in his dick and now gets to shit in a bag for the rest of his life as proof and testimony.

    Get the trial started and lets hang this fucker already.

    Leave a comment:


  • exlude
    replied
    It would be fine if his chain of command continues to Article 15 him for it.

    Leave a comment:


  • onemeangixxer7502
    replied
    what a fucking joke, they're going to roll over and let this dude insult them like this?

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied


    Judge: Hasan beard OK for Hood shooting trial

    The Associated Press
    Posted : Tuesday Dec 18, 2012 1742 EST

    FORT HOOD, Texas — The Army psychiatrist charged in the deadly Fort Hood shooting rampage apparently will be allowed to keep his beard during his military trial, after a new judge indicated Tuesday that she won’t force him to shave.

    The previous judge’s order requiring Maj. Nidal Hasan to be clean-shaven or be forcibly shaved before his trial had tied up the case for more than three months, but an appeals court ousted that judge earlier this month.
    Related reading

    12/3: Judge off Hood case; Hasan shave order tossed

    The new judge overseeing Hasan’s case told him during a hearing Tuesday that the beard, now thicker than when he first appeared in court with it in June, violates Army regulations. The judge, Col. Tara Osborn, said she won’t hold it against him but that military jurors might.

    Hasan answered “yes, ma’am” when Osborn asked if he grew the beard voluntarily. In a previous court hearing, he said he grew the beard because his Muslim faith requires it and not as a show of disrespect. Osborn asked defense attorneys to draft jury instructions about the issue. Jurors likely will be told not to consider Hasan’s appearance when deciding on a verdict.

    Hasan, 42, an American-born Muslim, faces the death penalty or life in military prison without parole if convicted in the 2009 rampage that killed 13 and wounded more than two dozen others on the Texas Army post.

    Osborn was appointed to the case two weeks ago, after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces removed the former judge and tossed his order regarding Hasan’s beard. The ruling said Col. Gregory Gross did not appear impartial while presiding over Hasan’s case and that the command — not a judge — is responsible for enforcing military grooming standards.

    Hasan’s trial date hasn’t been set. Osborn first has to rule on several pending motions. Defense attorneys also want Osborn to reverse Gross’ rulings on nearly two dozen motions, including requests for change-of-venue, a couple of experts and some investigative reports.

    Defense attorneys also said they will again ask that Hasan be allowed to plead guilty. At an August hearing, Gross said he was not able to accept a guilty plea on the 13 charges of premeditated murder because Army rules prohibit a judge from accepting a guilty plea in a death penalty case.

    Hasan also is charged with 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder.

    Leave a comment:


  • exlude
    replied
    You can take pay from an officer with an art 15, but rank requires a court martial conviction

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X